Ujjwal Maheshwari
295 posts


I'm now able to tell my agent “we are going to work on JIRA-1234” and it goes and pulls down the task, makes me a plan, I say yeah okay that looks good, and it generates the commit. I run an AI review from a different session, it finds 4 issues of varying priorities, I paste it to my original agent and say validate these findings and fix them if necessary, it creates a fix, I run another review, no more high priority issues found. I open up the code in an IDE to go over it before pushing it up for human review. Looks fine I guess, nothing crazy. I try to understand everything before I push it up for review because if this breaks, it's still my name on it. I say why did you make this one change, it gives me a reasonable explanation for why. It says something codebaity like "if you want I can suggest 2 more ways you could really tighten up this work to prevent some rare but possible regressions". I'm smart enough to not fall for it. Code pushed up, task moved to in-review. I didn't write any of it, this is not my accomplishment. Users won't care who wrote it if it works. A lot done in 20 mins but it felt soulless.



New Heroes portrait of @Google's @JeffDean for the @theNAEng & @theNASEM. Spending time with Jeff is a reminder that kindness and brilliance can live side by side. He is one of the great architects of the modern internet, the co-creator of MapReduce and Bigtable, and the driving force behind TensorFlow. Today his work touches billions of lives, yet he carries it all with an amused, approachable warmth. In conversation he is rigorous and honest, but also generous, especially with younger engineers who still recall his detailed, thoughtful code reviews. Elected to the National Academy of Engineering, Jeff continues to shape the future of artificial intelligence while never losing his delight in the puzzle of a good problem. Full bio: explorers.com/jeff-dean/




𝐈𝐭’𝐬 𝐟𝐮𝐧𝐧𝐲 𝐡𝐨𝐰 𝐩𝐚𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐧𝐬 𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐰 𝐮𝐩. A regular at the club was playing with us and kept insisting points were his, even when it was clearly out. At first, I brushed it off as competitiveness. But it kept happening. Something just felt… off. A few things didn’t add up in my mind, and I asked our club managers for his payments. Found out he hadn’t been paying for his games. He was using my name, clicking a photo of the scanner as if he was paying, and never actually doing it. When we confronted him, there were vague excuses, shifting accounts, and stories that didn’t quite add up. What struck me was this: 𝐇𝐨𝐰 𝐬𝐨𝐦𝐞𝐨𝐧𝐞 𝐛𝐞𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐞𝐬 𝐢𝐧 𝐨𝐧𝐞 𝐚𝐫𝐞𝐚 𝐨𝐟 𝐥𝐢𝐟𝐞 𝐨𝐟𝐭𝐞𝐧 𝐞𝐜𝐡𝐨𝐞𝐬 𝐢𝐧 𝐨𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐬. The same dishonesty about accepting a lost point showed up in the way he was hiding non-payment. Small signs, similar behaviour. It reminded me that 𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐠𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐢𝐬𝐧'𝐭 𝐚 𝐬𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐜𝐡; 𝐢𝐭 𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐰𝐬 𝐮𝐩 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐲, 𝐮𝐧𝐧𝐨𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐞𝐝 𝐦𝐨𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬. 𝐀𝐧𝐝 𝐬𝐨𝐦𝐞𝐭𝐢𝐦𝐞𝐬 𝐢𝐭'𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐬𝐞 𝐬𝐦𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐝𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐭𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐡𝐞𝐥𝐩 𝐫𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐚𝐥 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐛𝐢𝐠𝐠𝐞𝐫 𝐭𝐫𝐮𝐭𝐡.


today i fulfilled a boyhood dream and visited the smithsonian air and space museum (udvar-hazy). here are some favorite exhibits.




Build your own pseudo DSPy-ish prompt auto-optimiser in 3 steps with @braintrustdata: 1. Grab Braintrust’s OpenAPI and turn into MCP (there are OSS libs to do that) 2. Plug-in that MCP to Cursor 3. In Agent mode: “please optimise this prompt (@src/prompt.ts) based on evals (pnpm run evals) until you get a substantial improvement. Try up to 10 times.” 4. Enjoy free accuracy gains and your promotion to principal














