Aditya Bharadwaj

‘The conservative legal movement in America was initiated to change the status quo, which eventually took roughly 30 years to move from the Horowitz Report to a Supreme Court majority shaped by Federalist Society alumni. Starting and sustaining a legal movement is not a cakewalk; it is a herculean task. In the US, it was a long march through the institutions, one characterised by patience, strategic discipline, and intellectual seriousness, and eventually sustained across cycles of both political defeat and political success. The Left in India built its ecosystem gradually over decades and currently has a significant edge, at least in terms of an ecosystem spanning across legal and social institutions, which are interconnected and function with interoperability. The Indic cause is not starting from nothing. It has electoral power, financial resources, a large network of practising lawyers, and a growing cohort of young people sympathetic to its broad aims. But there is no legal movement, and we are far from initiating any.’ In our first, Abhimanyu Singh, Deepesh Gulgulia, and Shubham Srivastav review ‘The Rise of the Conservative Legal Movement: The Battle for Control of the Law’ by Steven Teles. The full copy will be out by the end of the month. Painting by Arthur (Art) Lien

In the 60s, Fairchild, that Fairchild, personally went to India because they wanted their first offshore manufacturer to be there. They wanted to produce 10 million transistors yearly; the government explicitly told them to produce only 600k. They decided to leave for Hong Kong.

Scan the QR to join AISA Join the movement and to continue this struggle for education and democracy that brought a government of dictators to its knees

In the 60s, Fairchild, that Fairchild, personally went to India because they wanted their first offshore manufacturer to be there. They wanted to produce 10 million transistors yearly; the government explicitly told them to produce only 600k. They decided to leave for Hong Kong.

Two things contributed to the collapse of the Yugoslav economy. One was that Tito borrowed ungodly amounts of money from the IMF and Western banks, because he was convinced Capitalism would end within his lifetime, and therefore the loans would never have to be paid back.

Severance pay? There is 12% GST on most cancer medicines. They removed it on some, but several cancer medicines attract heavy GST even today.

"IT BROUGHT TEARS TO MY EYES": PAWAN KALYAN BREAKS DOWN OVER PM MODI'S JANTAR MANTAR INSULT, URGES YOUTH TO RESPECT LEADERSHIP

Team India Baseball Jersey at the U18 International Series 🇮🇳 ⚾️ Indian Squad was fully comprised of diaspora players from USA & Canada

में उत्तराखंड से हु मेरे पिता आर्मी में हैं और मेरी माता हाउसवाइफ है, मेरा एक छोटा भाई है...! इसलिए हमें हर 2 साल में पढ़ाई के लिए मूव करना पड़ता है – नेहा बोरा मेरे परिवार में सब लोग राइट विंग की तरफ है, मेरी मां राइट विंग बीजेपी को स्पोर्ट करती थी...! में जब 10 – 11 वी क्लास में पढ़ती थी तभी से मेरा हृदय परिवर्तन हो गया और लेफ्ट की तरफ आई..! मैने शुरू से ही लेफ्ट के पोएट चाहे पाब्लो नारूदा अरुधंति राय या असद अली साह हो इनको पढ़ा था..! जिन लोगो के प्रति मेरी मां के विचार भिन्न थे तब अनशन के 22वे दिन आई तब उनको पता चला उनकी बेटी के वो खड़े हैं सेवा कर रहे हैं.....!

bejing or new delhi

Sr Adv Colin Gonsalves: Our compilation demonstrates that the three-year practice requirement is not necessary. I also deal with the expansion of judicial academies. By 2026, almost every State, barring a few smaller ones, has a full-fledged State Judicial Academy. The time is therefore ripe to train judges after they graduate from law schools. Instead, we are sending fresh graduates back into litigation for three years. Then there is an an article by a former Director of the National Judicial Academy. In paragraph 13, he recommends replacing the three-year practice requirement with a mandatory, intensive induction training programme. The compilation also addresses judicial education in collaboration with universities. It refers to the University of Virginia model and, subsequently, the French model, both of which emphasise collaboration between judicial academies and universities. Another suggestion is to adopt experiential learning from the very beginning through legal aid work, clerkships and internships, coupled with continuous evaluation, accountability mechanisms and holistic judicial training. The compilation also sets out the views of the National Law Universities. I believe the learned Amicus' presentation may not have fully reflected them. ...National Law Universities and leading law schools across the country consistently recommend against retaining the three-year practice rule. Now on deal with judicial vacancies. Higher Judicial Service examinations continue to witness a significant number of vacancies across the country. The data also shows that only around 20% of graduates from National Law Universities enter litigation. The experience of the NLUs is that retaining the three-year practice requirement discourages graduates from leading law schools from opting for judicial service. The compilation also refers to a speech by former Chief Justice N.V. Ramana, where he observed that very few graduates from National Law Schools are interested in joining litigation.

TIL YIMBY’s believe that if you put 30 years of mortgage payments into a property, it should be worth less than when you started. Amazing take, guy