Mike

441 posts

Mike

Mike

@undead641

Katılım Nisan 2022
49 Takip Edilen8 Takipçiler
Mike
Mike@undead641·
@dreadconquest By what metric should socialist economies be measured?
English
0
0
0
13
Mike
Mike@undead641·
@fivepebbsii @left2right66 @esjesjesj They exist, because something went wrong. They don’t define the group. My definition does include them. XY= male. XX = female. Adult male = man. Adult female = woman.
English
1
0
0
28
Lilith
Lilith@fivepebbsii·
@undead641 @left2right66 @esjesjesj These people exist you know. If an intersex person is born, which millions are every year. If your definition can’t account for them, and my definition can account for every person on earth. Mines is better
English
1
0
0
15
Mike
Mike@undead641·
@y47wb8r74j @left2right66 @esjesjesj Made a mistake. I’m not getting into an argument on extreme outliers. A biological male can never be a woman. Have a good day.
English
0
0
0
16
yun
yun@y47wb8r74j·
@undead641 @left2right66 @esjesjesj The female sex traditionally has XX chromosomes lol. What about women born without ovaries, or women with XXY chromosomes, or just infertile women? Are they all actually men?
English
1
0
0
19
Mike
Mike@undead641·
@fivepebbsii @left2right66 @esjesjesj You’re using “women” incorrectly. You’re attempting to define “woman”, the singular term. The social expectation, dictionary definition, and biological fact says, a woman must be biologically female. Define female?
English
1
0
0
23
Lilith
Lilith@fivepebbsii·
@undead641 @left2right66 @esjesjesj Then I’ll rectify it if it brings so much issue, a women is a person who identifies with the social expectations and qualifiers tied to femininity and being female.
English
1
0
0
15
Mike
Mike@undead641·
@fivepebbsii @left2right66 @esjesjesj This tactic can constitute a "fallacy of composition" if used to falsely argue that an extreme exception represents the entire group.
English
0
0
0
13
Mike
Mike@undead641·
@fivepebbsii @left2right66 @esjesjesj Words like male and female aren’t meant to describe a broad range of individuals, only a specific group meeting those qualifications. If you need extreme outliers to make a point, you have no point.
English
2
0
0
21
Mike
Mike@undead641·
@fivepebbsii @left2right66 @esjesjesj In a debate, a word cannot effectively define itself. Using the word being defined within the definition itself is considered a circular definition or a tautology, which is logically fallacious and unhelpful.
English
1
0
0
17
Lilith
Lilith@fivepebbsii·
@undead641 @left2right66 @esjesjesj However, my definition for women can easily tell you if everyone on the planet is a woman with no ifs ands or buts. And it’s also significantly more effective in your day to day life.
English
2
0
0
19
Mike
Mike@undead641·
@fivepebbsii @left2right66 @esjesjesj No, you use a circular definition, which always leads back to “What is a woman?” You don’t understand this or refuse to understand it, because it doesn’t fit your narrative. A word cannot define itself.
English
0
0
0
8
Mike
Mike@undead641·
@fivepebbsii @left2right66 @esjesjesj It’s the dictionary definition. “Shitty” is your opinion. Syndromes exist to define extreme outliers. A typical man cannot get pregnant, and a person with XY chromosomes with Swyer syndrome cannot get pregnant without IVF, with only 15-20 successful pregnancies, ever.
English
1
0
0
26
Lilith
Lilith@fivepebbsii·
@undead641 @left2right66 @esjesjesj If your definition of a word doesn’t include outliers, then it’s a shitty definition. Also, I thought men can’t get pregnant? So now you’re telling me men can get pregnant. I thought I was the liberal
English
2
0
0
25
Mike
Mike@undead641·
@fivepebbsii @left2right66 @esjesjesj You’re talking about an extreme outlier. Also, a person with Swyer syndrome can only get pregnant via IVF. They are male, biologically. They are not female. You shouldn’t use conditions to define typical human biology. It’s sloppy.
English
1
0
0
39
Lilith
Lilith@fivepebbsii·
@undead641 @left2right66 @esjesjesj So if someone has Swyer syndrome, where they are XY, but end up developing a uterus, full female genitalia and can even get pregnant. Are they or are they not a women?
English
1
0
0
36
Mike
Mike@undead641·
@fivepebbsii @left2right66 @esjesjesj No, I’m not, at all. “Cool” is subjective. Many people find sports to be “cool”, but many people find sports lame. I defined cool, adequately. Also, the word woman isn’t subjective.
English
1
0
0
25
Lilith
Lilith@fivepebbsii·
@undead641 @left2right66 @esjesjesj Yeah, well you’re getting at my point. We both have a pretty good idea on what cool mean. However, trying to define something as cool or uncool is a completely stupid idea, a thing is cool if it’s cool, that’s it. You are agreeing with me right now
English
1
0
0
25
Lilith
Lilith@fivepebbsii·
@left2right66 @undead641 @esjesjesj I don’t think someone meditating is considered “cool” but it meets all those criteria, an by your definition, stuff like motorcycle races aren’t cool, as they are usually funded by a corporation and high energy. Try again lol
English
1
0
0
27
Mike
Mike@undead641·
@y47wb8r74j @left2right66 @esjesjesj False, female is the sex with XY chromosomes. A baby can be female but not a woman. Only adult females can be women. Female: of or denoting the producing ova or bears young. Woman: an adult human female. Hope this helps.
English
1
0
0
18
Mike
Mike@undead641·
@fivepebbsii @left2right66 @esjesjesj This is a circular definition. This comes back to “What is a woman?”, because the last word used in your response. Similar to “A cat is something identified as a cat.” You need other descriptors to define that word.
English
1
0
0
28
Lilith
Lilith@fivepebbsii·
@left2right66 @esjesjesj A women is a person who identifies with the social expectations and qualifiers of being a women
English
2
0
11
372
Mike
Mike@undead641·
@vermxnscum @MarkSmitty74 @ABmrJutt The baseline risk for an unhealthy or unviable pregnancy with an older man is 4-5%, slightly higher than young men at 3-4%. For older women, birth defects and unviable pregnancies are ~15 compared to about 4% younger women. The difference in men’s age is insignificant, really.
English
0
0
0
12
Taylor Vakarian
Taylor Vakarian@vermxnscum·
@MarkSmitty74 @ABmrJutt Men can still impregnate sure but the fact is that the older a man is the more likely his sperm produces an unhealthy and unviable child. Just because you still can doesn’t mean it’s still good lmao.
English
1
0
5
62
jezz
jezz@ABmrJutt·
Women’s egg quality stays stable with age , it’s men’s sperm that have a biological clock” This actually makes so much sense logically. Because: when a girl is born she has all her lifetime of eggs already in her ovaries
English
57
433
4.1K
54.2K