Crossing the Rubicomm
31K posts
@ustprinzip
sometimes-funny pOsT-mOdErN nEo-MaRxIsT || Always Be Posting
the audacity to say "first they came for the communists" after we just watched immigrants being mass deported / detained in camps with no due process truly emblematic of a leftist's world view. it's only existential to you when it's your ideology on the line
Yeah can I get the nasty dirty filthy disgusting chai latte please. Iced
Three boys avoid jail after rape of two teenage girls. Read more 🔗 trib.al/xn9Bhyn
Scoop: SOUTHCOM Commander Gen. Francis Donovan is meeting w/ Secretary Hegseth at the Pentagon today, a source w/ knowledge tells @MSNOWNews The meeting, @ Hegseth's request, comes as USS Nimitz aircraft carrier arrived in the Caribbean this week amid heightened tensions w/ Cuba
One of the saddest things about life is that sandwiches are impossible to make with any other ingredient.
One good photo of you can dispel years of questioning whether you should get a nose or boob job
If you want an explanation as to why men are leaving the dating pool, watch this.
NEW COLUMN: The odds of a U.S. military strike on Cuba have gone way up as Trump & co grow increasingly frustrated with the communist regime’s intransigence. Sources tell me Southcom is drafting plans, and don’t count on the mess in Iran to slow Trump down. politico.com/news/magazine/…
How tankies look at you when you tell them you oppose all forms of imperialism, not just western ones
there was an entire section of the federalist papers about how making politicians live like paupers is how you get your government sold out to business interests constantly, when they discussed the common failure models of republican government
Waffle House workers rally in Atlanta, demand $25-an-hour wage and safer conditions atlantanewsfirst.com/2026/05/16/waf…
"The question is not whether Labour values have been usurped by Starmer’s faction. It is what kind of party could be built out of the corpse of Starmer’s party. One option is clearly a more Blairite party: pro-tech giants, the US, and privatisation. But are there any serious options to create a progressive party, one that dares speak out on the issues of the day, that actually communicates with a progressive electorate? It is hard to see at the moment whether the ambition or capacity exists within it. It is worth noting that Starmer’s Party is only barely the official party of the organised working class. Whereas Labour had affiliated to it nearly every major trade union, today only just over half of union members are in party-affiliated unions. And even then some may leave. This is hardly surprising: as it stands its policies, Starmer’s Party’s political instincts, are far closer to those of the Tories and Reform than to the progressive parties that are eating it up. And that is not accidental, or the result of a lack of vision. It was the whole point." Read @DEHEdgerton's obituary for Starmerism newstatesman.com/politics/labou…
You'll never see the New York Times write an article like this talking about Palantir and Lockheed Martin.
