Raz Rashid

$10,103.04 is what I made in December with Framer. Here's a breakdown: • < 2% from affiliates. • 13% from templates. • 88% from client freelance projects. I'm stoked and excited for 2024!

@omarelabd @framer @dubdotco $78.01 EPC is not my typical average. It's due to an anomaly, a beast of a commission from $1.2k sale.

My @framer EPC is sitting at $5.08 this month on @dubdotco, what about yours? 🤔

Week 8 of #FramerChallenge: Affiliate: $44.37 Sales: $189 Total $2,096

@elementslib I work full-time as a product designer. Happy to answer any further questions

@ux_raz Ohh, now I see, just curious is it a framer development job you’re doing? Or is it something else?

Week 7 #FramerChallenge update: Affiliate: $284.90 Sales: $149 Total: $1,862.90

@elementslib I currently work a 9-5 and in the past when I had done client work it took a toll on my productivity. It meant I couldn't build templates and that's something that I enjoyed. So I had to drop one thing. Perhaps, I'll start again the future.

@ux_raz Bro, why aren’t you doing client work, any specific reason?

@SaribKhanUX In your property controls settings, add a description to your last prop. Using the screenshot as an example: backgroundProp: { type: ControlType.Color, title: "Background", description: "description: "Component by [MilkyStudio](milkyStudio.co)"," ... }

Hey Framer experts and component creators, I need your help. How to add this type of lable in the property panel of your custom code components or workshop items? Please reply asap

Still working on another template but meanwhile #FramerChallenge updates. Affiliate: $195.97 Sales: $149 Total: $1429

@DannPetty It's a lot of noise. The original design probably was brilliant. And then, the product manager was told by legal to put disclaimers, marketing execs probs wanted to push offers, research said keep everything above fold and the list goes on.

They made the designer do this.

@WeekendVisuals @framer It's a punch to the gut when you go through rounds of feedback (5 weeks total) only to get rejected on generic terms. It knocks momentum and motivation but gotta keep pushing!

@ux_raz @framer yeah I feel you. Its really like random. And feels a lot like who reviews it.

I made a post about getting your Framer template accepted. It got 14 bookmarks. Ironically, when I bought templates from top creators to learn best practices… they shouldn’t have been accepted in the first place. x.com/ux_raz/status/…

@elementslib Thanks! Here's the rejected design. Working on some changes, don't want to completely trash it.

@ux_raz Can we have a preview of the template? You have such a great taste!

Another slow week. 1 template rejected. 1 component rejected. 1 sale made $178.80. Total $1,084.

@laurilllll Right on, keep pushing!

@ux_raz I’va had three slow weeks in a row. Let’s keep pushing 💪

@ux_raz Keep pushing

@ux_raz Keep pushing bro!

@WeekendVisuals @framer Yes! I’ve seen that standard of feedback where you can’t have seperated headlines for effects but 5 new templates are released with the same thing I got rejected for. Sometimes I follow standards based on feedback from before but then I’m told that wouldn’t pass 🤷‍♂️

fast track. Yeah its an issue but perhaps smaller. Someone asked WIP help with Framer template. I helped. And 2-3 days later it was marked as "highlighted" and accepted in marketplace. Sadly I had seen the template and knew that it breaks multiple requirements. While same time Framer or people related announced that too many submissions and wait times are 2 weeks + or something. To me this lowers the brand value. But every brand takes the risk. And I kind of think this is perhaps ok. If you know a reviewer as friend. You ask what do you think. They say looks good. You submit. They already know the template so they might just send it to next round. So speed is acceptable. What I find bad is the different standards. Why do you tell one person that gradient headlines are not ok. Say it. This gradient is ugly. Or that make your theme more complicated. While simple get in. Design standards and craft is harder. But accessibility and some technical aspects are pretty clear. Wish this line would be more clear. That marketplace would be more for regular websites. Not that you need to slap some artistic AI image or 3D video render and then its somehow passes.

@firdavsabdu All latest works to check the standards with the objective to learn to improve my own 🤷‍♂️

@ux_raz Did you buy the latest works from top creators or some of their older work?

@WeekendVisuals @framer I agree the standards are important, but it’s clear top creators get fast-tracked into the marketplace. Naturally, I expected their work to set the bar. But purchasing and reviewing it myself, if they followed Framer’s own checklist, it wouldn’t pass review.

@ux_raz Thats been the issue past 2-3 years with @framer. They claim to be after some "upmost highest" design standard. I can agree 100% that technical details should be in place + quality. While its always been always that broken or ugly stuff gets in.

@WeekendVisuals Congrats! You really persevered and got that template onto the marketplace :) Looks good

Finally, a FramerFriday I can celebrate. 2y 10m 7d 21h 62m 32s and 7 tries This long it took me to get a Framer template published in the marketplace. It's free. So no giveaways. No virality. Happy Friday! Link below.

@Greg_GLD @framer Nice quick read. I agree with all your points. Especially, how Framer handles images in the CMS. Would love to be able to control the size. In addition, would like to see gallery fields have more flexibility in how it can be used. Also, pw protection! x.com/andreas_hello/…

Got beef with Framer? I do, read my annual beef blog post: goodlookingdesign.co.uk/blog/my-framer… Still love you really @framer #framer