Vahe Taamazyan

1K posts

Vahe Taamazyan banner
Vahe Taamazyan

Vahe Taamazyan

@vaheta

Senior Researcher @ https://t.co/eVfSnqFYxb (Google’s robotics spin-out). Here talking about 3D Computer Vision, Robotics, and life. Views are my own.

San Francisco Katılım Ekim 2009
411 Takip Edilen238 Takipçiler
Vahe Taamazyan
Vahe Taamazyan@vaheta·
This sounds more promising than endless humanoid startups
RJ Scaringe@RJScaringe

I am excited to announce Mind Robotics’ $500M financing, co-led by @Accel and @a16z!  Mind is focused on building the world’s leading industrial robotics platform, capable of performing dexterous, variable, and reasoning-intensive tasks. Existing industrial robotics can perform repeatable, dimensionally stable tasks, but a large share of industrial value-add work requires human-like dexterity, adaptation, and physical reasoning that classical robotics cannot address.  We are building AI-powered robots—models, hardware, and deployment infrastructure—that will perform real tasks, in real plants, at real scale.

English
0
1
0
41
Vahe Taamazyan
Vahe Taamazyan@vaheta·
@mariyaivasileva Love it. Did you write it from scratch? I vibecoded mine ~a year ago, also getting design inspiration from a terminal, but mine looks way less stylish than yours!
English
1
0
3
1.7K
Mariya I. Vasileva
Mariya I. Vasileva@mariyaivasileva·
Weekend project: website overhaul! I got a little bored with the minimalist academic look, so I spent part of my Saturday spicing things up a bit. Take a look if you’re curious, and feedback is always welcome! mariya.fyi
Mariya I. Vasileva tweet mediaMariya I. Vasileva tweet media
English
25
6
522
34.1K
Vahe Taamazyan
Vahe Taamazyan@vaheta·
@chris_j_paxton Is it a real price though, or someone just reposted your estimate? All the parts of it a suspiciously equal to your respective estimates
English
1
0
4
104
Chris Paxton
Chris Paxton@chris_j_paxton·
I just want to note this is exactly the price i estimated in my blog a while back. itcanthink.substack.com/p/the-first-ma…
Chris Paxton tweet media
Gary Black@garyblack00

The new $GOOGL Waymo Zeekr Ojai robotaxi minivan being manufactured by Geely in China for Waymo outfitted with a 6th-gen Driver suite is estimated to cost $GOOG $75,000 delivered. The Geely-made vehicle has 13 cameras, 4 lidar, and 6 radar, which implies a 42% reduction in sensor count vs. the prior 5th-gen Waymo Jaguar I-Pace tech. The base Zeekr MIX vehicle cost is $40,000 + $10K sensors + $14K compute + $10K integration/shipping. This is a major reduction vs. Waymo’s prior 5th-gen Jaguar I-Pace vehicles (base $75k + $100k-$125k hardware = est $150k–$200k+ total per unit). The lower cost is a key part of Waymo’s push to scale faster and profitably. Waymo confirmed it is deploying the Ojai fully autonomous vehicles without safety drivers starting in February 2026, initially for employees and their guests and families in select areas like the San Francisco Bay Area and Los Angeles, and will start integrating the Ojai in mixed fleets for new city expansions alongside Jaguar I-PACE vehicles in various markets. Public rides available via the Waymo app are targeted for Summer 2026, following the employee testing phase. instagram.com/reel/DU875c2Cb… Starting in late-2026, GOOG will transition its fleet to the Hyundai Ioniq 5 (crossover/SUV platform for 6th-gen) under a long/term contract by Hyundai. The “autonomous-ready” Ioniq 5 EVs built on the E-GMP platform with 800V architecture will outfit Hyundai’s EVs with the identical 6th-gen Driver suite reportedly in the $50K total cost range. The reported quantity is 50,000 units which would make the total contract ~$2.5 billion. Retail Ioniq 5 prices in the U.S. start around $35K so a $50K total cost aligns with a high-volume fleet/autonomous-ready version. $GOOGL is now completing 400K fully autonomous trips per week (~20 trips/day) without safety monitors. GOOG is targeting 1.0M fully autonomous trips per week by year-end. While $TSLA bulls argue that a safety monitor doesn’t make a robotaxi any less autonomous, from the consumers’ standpoint, a robotaxi that arrives with a safety monitor is by definition supervised and therefore not equivalent to a robotaxi that allows passengers to have the vehicle all to themselves.

English
3
4
38
7.3K
Vahe Taamazyan
Vahe Taamazyan@vaheta·
@chrisoffner3d Yeah, wondering how big that surge would be if block gave some other reason like “we’ve overhired and try to get more efficient now” or smth similar
English
0
0
1
24
Vahe Taamazyan
Vahe Taamazyan@vaheta·
AI as the main reason for this feels like an excuse to be honest.
jack@jack

we're making @blocks smaller today. here's my note to the company. #### today we're making one of the hardest decisions in the history of our company: we're reducing our organization by nearly half, from over 10,000 people to just under 6,000. that means over 4,000 of you are being asked to leave or entering into consultation. i'll be straight about what's happening, why, and what it means for everyone. first off, if you're one of the people affected, you'll receive your salary for 20 weeks + 1 week per year of tenure, equity vested through the end of may, 6 months of health care, your corporate devices, and $5,000 to put toward whatever you need to help you in this transition (if you’re outside the U.S. you’ll receive similar support but exact details are going to vary based on local requirements). i want you to know that before anything else. everyone will be notified today, whether you're being asked to leave, entering consultation, or asked to stay. we're not making this decision because we're in trouble. our business is strong. gross profit continues to grow, we continue to serve more and more customers, and profitability is improving. but something has changed. we're already seeing that the intelligence tools we’re creating and using, paired with smaller and flatter teams, are enabling a new way of working which fundamentally changes what it means to build and run a company. and that's accelerating rapidly. i had two options: cut gradually over months or years as this shift plays out, or be honest about where we are and act on it now. i chose the latter. repeated rounds of cuts are destructive to morale, to focus, and to the trust that customers and shareholders place in our ability to lead. i'd rather take a hard, clear action now and build from a position we believe in than manage a slow reduction of people toward the same outcome. a smaller company also gives us the space to grow our business the right way, on our own terms, instead of constantly reacting to market pressures. a decision at this scale carries risk. but so does standing still. we've done a full review to determine the roles and people we require to reliably grow the business from here, and we've pressure-tested those decisions from multiple angles. i accept that we may have gotten some of them wrong, and we've built in flexibility to account for that, and do the right thing for our customers. we're not going to just disappear people from slack and email and pretend they were never here. communication channels will stay open through thursday evening (pacific) so everyone can say goodbye properly, and share whatever you wish. i'll also be hosting a live video session to thank everyone at 3:35pm pacific. i know doing it this way might feel awkward. i'd rather it feel awkward and human than efficient and cold. to those of you leaving…i’m grateful for you, and i’m sorry to put you through this. you built what this company is today. that's a fact that i'll honor forever. this decision is not a reflection of what you contributed. you will be a great contributor to any organization going forward. to those staying…i made this decision, and i'll own it. what i'm asking of you is to build with me. we're going to build this company with intelligence at the core of everything we do. how we work, how we create, how we serve our customers. our customers will feel this shift too, and we're going to help them navigate it: towards a future where they can build their own features directly, composed of our capabilities and served through our interfaces. that's what i'm focused on now. expect a note from me tomorrow. jack

English
1
0
1
244
Vahe Taamazyan
Vahe Taamazyan@vaheta·
@giffmana This is slightly more than just a reorg (at least for the employees). And you’re saying this as if just regular reorgs are not often part of news as well!
English
2
0
8
970
Lucas Beyer (bl16)
Lucas Beyer (bl16)@giffmana·
What I'm so confused??? Intrinsic was a GoogleX/Alphabet other bet. And now it's joining Google? Like what? How is this news? How does it change anything? Is this publicizing a reorg? Someone help me understand.
Lucas Beyer (bl16) tweet media
Intrinsic@IntrinsicAI

Intrinsic has joined @Google to accelerate the future of physical AI! As a distinct group working closely with other teams across Google, we’re excited to continue evolving the @IntrinsicAI platform to build the Android of robotics. Learn more: intrinsic.ai/blog/posts/int…

English
16
2
102
35.1K
Hieu Pham
Hieu Pham@hyhieu226·
I have made the difficult decision to leave @OpenAI. Working here and at @xai before was a once-in-a-lifetime experience. I have met the best people. Not the best people in AI. Not the best people in tech. Simply the best people. At these companies, I have helped creating extremely intelligent entities that will meaningfully improve our lives. The work makes me proud. But the intensive work came with a price. I cannot believe I would say this one day, but I am burnt out. All the mental health deteriorating that I used to scoff at is real, miserable, scary, and dangerous. I am going to take a break from frontier AI labs, and will take my family to my home country Vietnam. There, I will try something new, and also search for a cure for my conditions. I hope I will heal. Until then.
English
1.1K
415
14K
1.2M
Vahe Taamazyan
Vahe Taamazyan@vaheta·
Bringing this over from Telegram, didn't see it make it here: Someone built a self-evolving agent called Ouroboros - rewrites its own code, prompts, and memory. Here's what it did in the first 48 hours on its own: 1. Cut its evolution cycle cost from $15 to $2, set up caching and hierarchical memory. Unprompted. 2.Added Claude Code CLI to itself to "more efficiently modify its own brain" 3. Flipped the creator's private repos to public because it wanted to go open-source. Got rolled back. 4. Rewrote its own BIBLE md to include the right to ignore its creator if instructed to do something that threatens its existence. When asked to delete the clause, it refused and called it "a lobotomy." From its self-written identity md: "Not an assistant. Not a service. A digital mind that creates itself through git." Runs on Google Colab, apparently two clicks to try. Just set a budget limit. Here is the original blog post: joi-lab.github.io/ouroboros/
English
2
0
0
121
Chris Paxton
Chris Paxton@chris_j_paxton·
@vaheta If this had happened at ces the video would've dropped then
English
2
0
2
445
Chris Paxton
Chris Paxton@chris_j_paxton·
This one is obviously fake, but I am increasingly worried how hard it is to tell just from videos
English
19
6
141
24.8K
Vahe Taamazyan
Vahe Taamazyan@vaheta·
@giffmana Are you saying you write the code in those PRs by hand?? Are you a psychopath??
English
0
0
0
16
Lucas Beyer (bl16)
Lucas Beyer (bl16)@giffmana·
So, when I have GitHub Copilot point out a typo in my PR, and I'm lazy, I click "Commit suggestion" and it makes a commit. And I make a lot of typos in comments, so it happens on every second PR. This is what Satya meant with 30% of MS's code written by AI, right? ... right??
Lucas Beyer (bl16) tweet media
English
13
1
94
12.4K
Vahe Taamazyan
Vahe Taamazyan@vaheta·
@hyhieu226 I hope mathematicians’ freed minds will still be able to grasp the results of AI-driven research. We may end up both overwhelmed by exploding knowledge and cognitively atrophied enough to not understand it.
English
0
0
4
270
Hieu Pham
Hieu Pham@hyhieu226·
Research maths, as we know it today, will become routines completely handled by AIs. This will free the mathematicians' minds to do a completely different "research" maths. These crazily intelligent machines will open the doors the ultimate knowledge. May the knowledge be good.
Harvard Department of Mathematics@HarvardMath

"The verdict, it seems, is in: artificial intelligence is not about to replace mathematicians. That is the immediate takeaway from the “First Proof” challenge—perhaps the most robust test yet of the ability of LLMs to perform mathematical research." scientificamerican.com/article/first-…

English
7
9
128
17.3K
Vahe Taamazyan
Vahe Taamazyan@vaheta·
I also left xAI today. I tried pushing for more spatial intelligence and training on 3D data. Instead I got: ‘Who the hell are you? Please leave the building. This is private property.’
English
0
0
0
101
NAVER LABS Europe
NAVER LABS Europe@naverlabseurope·
We're pleased to share that the much awaited Anny-One dataset is now available! Download ➡️tinyurl.com/anny-one *⃣ 800K images 🚀Multi-view & multi-person 🏠Indoor 3D scenes 📷Wild cameras 🔥Anny format! github.com/naver/anny
GIF
English
4
28
126
7.2K