Trading Bulldog
215 posts

Trading Bulldog
@vaizex69
Day Trader $GC $NQ $BTC




Hey everyone, I have been in mental breakdown past two days and finally to calm myself down. I never cried too hard in my life. Many of you knew me as the guy who turned $300 into $200,000–$300,000 in just a few months trading $SPY. Lately there’s been a lot of positive and negative noise around me, but today hit the hardest. My biggest mistake was pure ignorance and sizing way too big despite solid advice from experienced traders here. I ignored it at times, and today I paid the full price for it. To be honest, I’m left with $10,000. It’s only April, with 8 months left in 2026. I’m determined to build it back up. This lesson will stay with me forever. To all the traders out there: please use my story as a warning. Don’t be like me, control your emotions and your size. And I will continue to post about $SPY and others, I deeply appreciate every single one of you on here.🙇♂️








The male G-spot revealed - and everyone who guessed it's in the rear was wrong: 'Intensely pleasurable' trib.al/apa2iEK


🚨 Something here doesn’t add up 🚨 @MSTARROHIT runs multiple accounts, trades normally, and stays profitable. Everything is fine until a $25,000 payout is requested. That’s when new claims suddenly appear: “Previously banned.” “Payment fraud.” If any of this was true, why was the trader allowed to buy accounts, place trades, and build profits in the first place? Why wait until payout to say something? Risk checks are supposed to protect firms before traders win ,not after. What makes this even stranger is that the same identity and payment method have been used at other prop firms with no issues and verified payouts. So what exactly changed when it was time to pay? @Topstep @MichaelPatak this isn’t about attacking anyone. It’s about fairness and clear communication. If rules are broken, act early. But taking profits after the fact without solid, transparent proof just doesn’t sit right.











