Valuesauce

"Are Greeks white?" is one of those questions that separates casual racists from elite race scientists

@haaretzcom Fuck them. Fucking terrorists

Bumps at funerals, lines in shelters: Israel's wars drive Israelis to drugs haaretz.com/life/2026-07-1…

You’re not the victims.

@HaleyforMI Fuck you zionist in a suit. Literally won’t win a general cuz aipac is funding your entire campaign. No one in Michigan is donating to you cuz you suck.

I was asked about the harassment I receive online. Here's my answer:

@TheMaineWonk You cuck

I gotta be honest. She’s grown on me. If I was a Michigander, I’d cast my ballot for Congresswoman Stevens in the Dem Primary.

@DavidAFrench Agreed, 40% support for genocidal terrorists is way too high. Should be 0% for Israel tbh. Just disgusting and as you said, grotesque, that anyone would still support Israel

This is grotesque

@romanhelmetguy jesus Fucking christ you racist idiots are so exhausting. What's a prototypical american face? You Fucking clown

Matt Damon has the prototypical American face. It's perfect for Saving Private Ryan or Good Will Hunting. But whenever he plays a character from ancient or medieval European history, it just feels like you're watching a present-day American playing dress-up.

Never noticed this scene in The X-Files before. Absolutely on point. Scully: "He immigrated to Israel after World War II where he joined the Irgun, Jewish military underground... He's a terrorist, Mulder. A killer."

@fred_guttenberg Genocide. Genocide. Genocide. One family doesn’t equal several thousand you fucking ghoul. Genocide. Fuck Israel

Next time they say genocide, tell them about October 7th. Tell them about this family.

@DecartAI Shut the fuck up you zionist IDF spy.

Meet Lucy 2.5, our most advanced Live AI model yet. Lucy edits videos in realtime, now with more capabilities and greater control. See how it's being used across streaming, e-commerce, advertising, and more 🧵

ya no thanks...gonna pass on IDF tech

@deanwball @TimSweeneyEpic you are insane.

@TimSweeneyEpic ok

Some observations on Kimi: 1. It's a very good model! I don't think its performance can be explained away by distillation or anything like that. In agentic coding sessions, it seems pretty much on par with the best public models of Q1 2026. In my fairly limited use, it also seemed very token hungry. It's not obvious to me that this model is actually that cheap to run. 2. I am personally surprised the Chinese state continues to allow the open sourcing of models this good, given potential risks. To be clear, I *myself* might be fine with models presenting this level of marginal risk being open weight, but I am surprised that China is fine with it. I suspect the reason they are is 75% explained by strategic blindness/lack of AGI-pilledness (the CCP is very Yann Lecun-y in its views of AI). The other 25% or so is their lack of compute for customer inference (making China's open-weight strategy an unintended byproduct of US export controls) and the normal Chinese strategy of aggressive exports. For the companies, as opposed to the government, the decision to open source is partially ideological and partially because they are behind, and they know that very few people would pay for sub-frontier models from China. 3. Open-weight models are inherently decelerationist, and I'm continually surprised to see the so-called "accelerationists" so excited about open-weight models. I suspect the reason they are is that they know open-weight models are effectively ungovernable, and they simply like the overall cloak of ungovernability open-weight models create over the whole of AI. It's not a bad strategy; it reminds me of James Scott's recounting of the hill people in "the art of not being governed." Still, in the end, open-weight models deter further AI capex. 4. One probable outcome of an open-weight-model-dominant world is full AI communism, which is precisely what China proposes: rather than a market product, AI is a "public good" which will ultimately be provided by the state as a kind of "digital public infrastructure." This future strikes me as a dystopian hellscape, but I've never met an open-weight models advocate who doesn't ultimately concede this is where things end. You'd be surprised how many 'accelerationists' lobbied me, while I was in government, to support an eleven or twelve-figure federally funded data center so that startups could train models at a subsidy and then give them away for free. There was no other way for AI to progress, they said. Perhaps this is the logical end state of things. Nonetheless, I find myself surprised to see supposed accelerationists excited about such an outcome. I think many of them just don't know what they're doing. Many accelerationists do not view the creation and serving of frontier models as a legitimate business. 5. I would guess that the Trump Administration will at some point realize that their best strategy here would be to create large amounts of regulatory risk around the use of open-weight Chinese models. You don't need to "ban open source" (one of the dumber motifs of AI policy discussion). You just need to direct every agency to issue soft law that creates FUD. "A Federal Reserve Advisory Bulletin found that there may be backdoors in Chinese AI models." It needn't be that well justified. You just create enough regulatory risk that every regulated enterprise backs off. You probably don't want to create so much regulatory risk that you scare off the hyperscalers from serving Chinese models; this will just drive startups to sketchier providers. There's a happy middle ground here. I'd assume they will do some version of this. 6. It's probably true that open-weight models of this capability make the world a bit more dangerous, but not so much more that you'll really notice. At some point the models will be capable enough that you will notice. "A nonliving, invisible, dangerous, and infinitely self-replicating agent escaped from a Chinese lab," you say? Color me shocked.

@deanwball You are insane if you are upset that ai would be a public good.

Dawg

"Cuando entramos en las prisiones de Israel, los prisioneros palestinos se orinan en sus pantalones al vernos, se orinan del miedo. Entramos en la celda de Marwan Barghouti y estaba llorando aterrorizado. Les dije a los carceleros que continuaran tratándoles así". Ben Gvir, el psicópata nazi que controla la policía de "Israel", se vanaglorió hoy de las torturas a las que someten a los palestinos en sus campos de concentración, diciendo orgulloso que los palestinos están tan aterrorizados que se orinan encima y lloran solo al verles. Esto es tranquilamente lo que diría un miembro de las SS el siglo pasado al ver a los prisioneros de sus campos de exterminio, es pura maldad, este genocida disfruta con el sufrimiento ajeno.

There has never been a war in history where 80% of the country has been destroyed, 100% of the population displaced, and 50% of the deaths children. Call it what it is: GENOCIDE.

@Oilfield_Rando What subversion you clown? You guys invented an overblown idea of what this was, it never was or claimed to be. You guys are just fucking lame losers

Which raises the question: Why do it all? Why even inject the subversion? Is it just subversion for subversion’s sake?

I can't believe China: - stole Nuclear triggers from the United States - sent mail bombs to President Truman - had spies acting as "art students" at the Twin Towers - attacked the USS Liberty - bombed Egypt and blamed Muslims in a false flag operation - pushed back against JFK over Nuclear site inspections - donated over $230 million to Donald Trump in the 2024 election - donates to over 94% of U.S. congress - pays Conservative influencers to push their Hasbara - spent $32 million to primary Thomas Massie - put out hit pieces against Charlie Kirk for platforming "anti-China" voices - had ties to Jeffrey Epstein Hey @grok. Can you please fact check this? Did China do these things?