Andrew VanLandingham

2.2K posts

Andrew VanLandingham banner
Andrew VanLandingham

Andrew VanLandingham

@vanman0254

Policy nerd focused on Medicaid and health IT @OIGatHHS. Tweets are my own personal opinion. Apologies for all the dog stuff / yelling at the Nationals.

Katılım Ocak 2009
773 Takip Edilen137 Takipçiler
Stephen Elliott
Stephen Elliott@ElliottStephenB·
Mae Beavers stem cells
English
3
1
12
1.4K
Laura Dague
Laura Dague@LauraDague·
@vanman0254 @OIGatHHS thank you Andrew! is there a public report you have in mind you are able to connect me with?
English
1
0
0
39
Laura Dague
Laura Dague@LauraDague·
IMO some nuance is missing from current conversations around TX Medicaid redeterminations. (Thread)
English
1
7
11
10K
Andrew VanLandingham
Andrew VanLandingham@vanman0254·
@LauraDague We at @OIGatHHS found several issues in our audits that demonstrate this problem. States paying MCOs for deceased enrollees & enrollees that have moved out of state and now covered by another plan. Those are pretty straight forward problems that are eligibility adjacent.
English
1
0
1
42
Laura Dague
Laura Dague@LauraDague·
As states have moved to these contracts, it matters a lot more for costs whether an individual counts as enrolled when they aren't actually using any health care services. Maybe this gets incorporated into contracting and maybe it doesn't, would love to see research on that.
English
2
1
1
5.9K
Andrew VanLandingham retweetledi
OIG at HHS
OIG at HHS@OIGatHHS·
New Report: HHS-OIG found that #Medicaid #managedcare organizations (MCOs) denied 1 out of 8 prior authorization requests for services, several MCOs had denial rates higher than 25%, and most states’ oversight of these denials was limited. direc.to/fgxu
OIG at HHS tweet media
English
1
3
6
2.2K
Andrew VanLandingham
Andrew VanLandingham@vanman0254·
@HealthPrivacy @healthapiguy @lisabari @OIGatHHS We will investigate health care providers once HHS establishes the disincentives. For more specific info, stay tuned to the HHS provider disincentives rule currently in development. But generally, priorities in OIG’s recent final rule are consistent across all of our authorities.
English
1
1
2
152
@healthprivacy
@healthprivacy@HealthPrivacy·
@vanman0254 @healthapiguy @lisabari @OIGatHHS thanks, @vanman0254 Isn't OIG responsible for investigating provider actors (w/referral to HHS for disincentive penalties)? Some parts of the rule seem relevant to investigations prior to penalty phase (eg, enforcement priorities). So a separate rule on provider investigations?
English
1
0
1
36
Andrew VanLandingham
Andrew VanLandingham@vanman0254·
@HealthPrivacy @healthapiguy @lisabari @OIGatHHS That’s not quite right. The due process and appeals pieces of the rule are specific to the civil monetary penalities that only apply to health IT developers and HIN / HIEs. All of that was specifically established in the Cures Act and it did apply to the provider disincentives.
English
2
0
1
43
Andrew VanLandingham
Andrew VanLandingham@vanman0254·
@nikillinit Most frequent error was not documenting treatment time. Every time I go to therapy the practitioner says “we’re about at time.” So they already monitor the clock; it’s just about documenting it. I’m sure there are easy ways to do that, but this isn’t a crazy requirement.
English
0
0
0
33
Nikhil Krishnan
Nikhil Krishnan@nikillinit·
@vanman0254 Appreciate the clarity - I guess it does make one wonder if the compliance measures required are feasible/too onerous or if maybe there are other passive ways to monitor this Or if I guess they assume they won’t get audited and actively decide it’s not worth their time?
English
1
0
0
61
Nikhil Krishnan
Nikhil Krishnan@nikillinit·
OIG did an audit of psychotherapy services provided during COVID and seems that have found that $580M of the $1B paid out were done so improperly oig.hhs.gov/oas/reports/re…
Nikhil Krishnan tweet media
English
4
1
14
5.8K