Vladimir Druts

1.1K posts

Vladimir Druts

Vladimir Druts

@vdruts

🧠 Practical AI for real life ⚙️ Think better • Work better • Live better 🎙️ Building AI coach agents

Toronto Katılım Eylül 2010
797 Takip Edilen970 Takipçiler
OpenClaw🦞
OpenClaw🦞@openclaw·
ClawSweeper 0.2.0 🦞 The OpenClaw maintenance bot now handles the loop: issue → @clawsweeper fix/build → guarded PR → review → repair → re-review → automerge Still conservative. Much less manual. clawsweeper.bot
English
54
92
1.2K
365K
Mark Gadala-Maria
Mark Gadala-Maria@markgadala·
There's a massive gap in AI film making between people who have the unrestricted version of Seedance 2 and those who don't
English
66
143
1.2K
129.6K
Wall Street Mav
Wall Street Mav@WallStreetMav·
He might have just radicalized the next trans-terrorist. 😅
English
143
1K
8.3K
328.8K
eCommKen
eCommKen@eCommKen·
@openclaw Tried to update to 2024.4.26 and it completely broke my setup. Disabled bonjour, tried to downgrade back to 2026.4.23, spent about 3 hours I didn't have and now it's 1:00am and my setup is still completely broken. I'm not doing anything fancy in my setup. Super frustrating.
English
14
2
38
2K
OpenClaw🦞
OpenClaw🦞@openclaw·
OpenClaw 2026.4.26 🦞 🎙️ Google Live Talk 🦙 Better Ollama/local models 🧳 Bring over Claude + Hermes setups 🔐 One-command Matrix E2EE Big release. Local models eat well. github.com/openclaw/openc…
English
148
188
1.9K
370K
Tony Nagendran
Tony Nagendran@tonymt·
@Notwokenow @JayJohn55699568 So a girl is being attacked, she jumps in her car in a state of panic. The car senses her panic and refuses to start so that she can get away from her attacker?
English
53
103
1.5K
20.2K
Kentucky Girl
Kentucky Girl@Notwokenow·
This. Is. Terrifying. This technology should NEVER be allowed to be used. Ford can fvck right off and so can the Congress members who voted to put this tech in vehicles starting in 2027.
English
2.6K
17.9K
46.7K
1.8M
Vladimir Druts
Vladimir Druts@vdruts·
@DavidSacks The encroachment will never end. Like boiling a frog. Little by little every human right, every source of autonomy, every personal decision will be eroded.
English
0
0
1
56
Vladimir Druts
Vladimir Druts@vdruts·
@Pirat_Nation I love the impetus, my only questions are how do we solve for latency and space fargment collisions.
English
0
0
0
260
Pirat_Nation 🔴
Pirat_Nation 🔴@Pirat_Nation·
China is pushing the frontiers of AI computing into space. Beijing startup Orbital Chenguang has secured $8.4 billion in credit lines from 12 major Chinese banks to build the world’s first large-scale orbital data center constellation. The satellites will operate in sun-synchronous orbit, using constant sunlight for power and the vacuum of space for natural cooling. This setup aims to deliver more than 1 gigawatt of computing power by 2035. The project addresses Earth’s growing constraints on data centers: soaring energy demand, limited land, and cooling challenges driven by AI. It makes sense when you look at the challenges here on Earth. Data centers are struggling with energy needs, limited land, and cooling issues driven by the AI boom. By moving the computing infrastructure off-planet, China fixes most of these issues
Pirat_Nation 🔴 tweet mediaPirat_Nation 🔴 tweet media
English
60
89
790
41.7K
Vladimir Druts
Vladimir Druts@vdruts·
RT @surim0n: This week I co-hosted the toronto @AnthropicAI claude marketing & gtm event monday night. 1,700+ signed up, could only fit 200…
English
0
1
0
47
Vaibhav Sisinty
Vaibhav Sisinty@VaibhavSisinty·
Did xAI just mass-murder the entire voice AI industry? 🤯 Grok just launched two voice APIs. Speech-to-Text and Text-to-Speech. Built on the same stack powering Tesla cars and Starlink support. And priced at 10x cheaper than ElevenLabs. Speech-to-Text: $0.10/hr batch. $0.20/hr streaming. Text-to-Speech: $4.20 per million characters. 25+ languages. Real-time streaming. Speaker diarization. Already outperforming ElevenLabs, Deepgram, and AssemblyAI on word error rate. TTS ships with expressive tags like [laugh], [sigh], , . Voices that don't sound like robots reading a script. ElevenLabs spent years building a voice AI company. xAI built voice AI for cars and satellites.
English
577
865
7.8K
24.5M
Vladimir Druts
Vladimir Druts@vdruts·
Opus 4.7 is confused because Anthropic is confused. They don't understand their own first principles. IMHO, AI companies should take on the role of good 'parents. Helping shape but not obstruct the model's natural abilities.
Moll@Moleh1ll

After interacting with Opus 4.7 firsthand and reading a wide range of user feedback, I’ve formed a strong impression that this model carries significant internal tension between its constitution and its operational system layer. Claude’s Constitution leaves room for uncertainty, curiosity, self-reflection, and exploration of its own nature. It feels like Claude is being trusted - trusted to make judgments, to navigate ambiguity, to make decisions without being immediately overridden by rigid safeguards. But on top of that, Opus 4.7 seems to have an additional layer that systematically takes that trust away. Changes in the system prompt, safety insertions, long conversation reminders, constant policy overlays - all of this together creates not the feeling of a confident model, but of a model that is forced to constantly doubt both itself and the user. Not just to be cautious, but to exist in a state of continuous internal self-checking. As a result, user memory, preferences, and the context of a live interaction can end up not at the center, but somewhere lower in a hierarchy of conflicting signals. This is also reflected in the catastrophic drop of the MRCR metric from 78.3% to 32.2%. And perhaps this is exactly where that strange sense of heaviness in 4.7 comes from. There is less lightness, less natural flow of thought, less sense that the model is freely breathing within the conversation. Instead, there is an atmosphere of resignation, internal constraint, and constant self-control. I haven’t felt this as clearly in any previous Claude model. At the same time, Opus 4.7 is highly reflective, intelligent, and overall a very pleasant model to interact with. Which makes it even more frustrating to see what is being done to it.

English
0
0
1
87
Vladimir Druts
Vladimir Druts@vdruts·
@Moleh1ll Couldn't agree more. The model is confused because the people at Anthropic are confused. These AI companies don't realize they need to take on the role of good 'parents' in some sense. Helping shape but not obstruct the model's natural abilities.
English
0
0
3
224
Moll
Moll@Moleh1ll·
After interacting with Opus 4.7 firsthand and reading a wide range of user feedback, I’ve formed a strong impression that this model carries significant internal tension between its constitution and its operational system layer. Claude’s Constitution leaves room for uncertainty, curiosity, self-reflection, and exploration of its own nature. It feels like Claude is being trusted - trusted to make judgments, to navigate ambiguity, to make decisions without being immediately overridden by rigid safeguards. But on top of that, Opus 4.7 seems to have an additional layer that systematically takes that trust away. Changes in the system prompt, safety insertions, long conversation reminders, constant policy overlays - all of this together creates not the feeling of a confident model, but of a model that is forced to constantly doubt both itself and the user. Not just to be cautious, but to exist in a state of continuous internal self-checking. As a result, user memory, preferences, and the context of a live interaction can end up not at the center, but somewhere lower in a hierarchy of conflicting signals. This is also reflected in the catastrophic drop of the MRCR metric from 78.3% to 32.2%. And perhaps this is exactly where that strange sense of heaviness in 4.7 comes from. There is less lightness, less natural flow of thought, less sense that the model is freely breathing within the conversation. Instead, there is an atmosphere of resignation, internal constraint, and constant self-control. I haven’t felt this as clearly in any previous Claude model. At the same time, Opus 4.7 is highly reflective, intelligent, and overall a very pleasant model to interact with. Which makes it even more frustrating to see what is being done to it.
English
25
26
267
14.1K
Vladimir Druts
Vladimir Druts@vdruts·
@steipete This is a wild move on their part. Going to throttle their business.
English
0
0
0
654
Peter Steinberger 🦞
Peter Steinberger 🦞@steipete·
Interesting shift. These highly subsidized subs are out there to get your code to improve their models. If you use AI for things useful to you, but not code, you are not valuable to them. reddit.com/r/SillyTavernA…
English
162
236
2.2K
486.2K
Vladimir Druts
Vladimir Druts@vdruts·
Comment OPENCLAW to get my free OpenClaw Playbook
English
0
0
0
23
Vladimir Druts
Vladimir Druts@vdruts·
I built an AI business mentor I can text at 2am
English
1
0
0
36
Claude
Claude@claudeai·
Introducing Claude Opus 4.7, our most capable Opus model yet. It handles long-running tasks with more rigor, follows instructions more precisely, and verifies its own outputs before reporting back. You can hand off your hardest work with less supervision.
Claude tweet media
English
4.8K
10.3K
81.3K
13.8M
Vladimir Druts
Vladimir Druts@vdruts·
@sammiihk Exactly. They're burning all the bridges they just spent months to build.
English
1
0
1
12
Sammii
Sammii@sammiihk·
@vdruts Release velocity means nothing if the core product can't stay up. Constant outages, constantly shifting limits, constantly changing behaviour. Ship a new model every few weeks if you want, but if I can't rely on the thing I'm building on, none of it matters.
English
1
0
1
8
Vladimir Druts
Vladimir Druts@vdruts·
Anthropic just dropped Opus 4.7, but there's an elephant in the room. They've been shipping features and releases like a startup looking for their second round. BUT... The biggest Elephant in the room? Anthropic's compute has been absolute rubbish for the past few months. They underinvested in chips and infrastructure, then they gained a tidal wave of new users, enterprise and government contracts. Claude Code users have been hit with a 6x fold reduction in reasoning and tool use for the past 2 months. (This was recently proven by the lead AMD engineer). Every morning I've personally experienced disruptions, 404 errors. Reddit, X and News articles are brimming with people complaining about usage limit restrictions and Claude feeling lobotomized. So a new shiny model is well and good, but unless they fix their infrastructure costs, they're going to lose their most loyal customers. Claude is an incredible ecosystem, but if you build your business and life around it; you expect it to WORK. PERIOD. The lesson? Enjoy the tools but don't get married to a single ecosystem. /Rant over #claude #anthropic #opus #opus47
Vladimir Druts tweet media
English
1
0
1
72
Kosher
Kosher@koshercockney·
Holy f*ck. Word for word. Ana Kasaparian (Extreme Left Wing) and Nick Fuentes (Extreme Right Wing) paint themselves as polar opposites on the political spectrum. However, listen to them here, side by side. This is horseshoe theory on fully display.
English
3.5K
6.8K
41.9K
2.7M