Chris Villarreal

13.4K posts

Chris Villarreal

Chris Villarreal

@venerable_bede

Baseball, Baylor, electricity policy nerd, and free markets. Former CA and MN PUC staff. Opinions reflected here are my own.

Twin Cities, Minnesota Katılım Eylül 2009
1.4K Takip Edilen1.4K Takipçiler
Chris Villarreal
Chris Villarreal@venerable_bede·
@duncancampbell Some family members in Iowa have gone all in opposing data centers. Amongst their arguments is basically a prime farmland argument- can't put a data center on the farmland! Well, can they put up solar? Note- i don't agree w/a ban, but at least this one seems consistent.
English
0
0
0
59
Chris Villarreal retweetledi
Durham Cathedral
Durham Cathedral@durhamcathedral·
He promised to support the ministry of the cathedral and advocating for the archives and helping people to discover the significance of the Venerable Bede and his work. The Dean prayed for Tom and asked for God’s blessing on his work.
Durham Cathedral tweet mediaDurham Cathedral tweet mediaDurham Cathedral tweet media
English
1
6
55
2.4K
Matt Stoller
Matt Stoller@matthewstoller·
Massive fight by incumbent utilities to block competition in building interstate transmission, basically really long high-tech extension cords. eenews.net/articles/state…
English
2
4
32
6.7K
Xiao Wang
Xiao Wang@xiaowang1984·
On point about the complaining. Where else in the world can households causally use 2MWh a year at 99.9+% availability and not be driven to the poorhouse. Spoiled by the good times.
Kevin Pranis@KevinPranis

@JaneAFlegal @xiaowang1984 “We spend a lot and get little in return”? You can literally flip a switch almost anywhere in the US and get as much or little electricity as you want 99.9%+ of the time for some of the lowest costs in the world and residents can get it w/o a credit score or redlining. WTAF

English
3
3
29
2.4K
Chris Villarreal retweetledi
Gary Sinise
Gary Sinise@GarySinise·
Today is our nations Memorial Day. Enjoy your day and take a moment to remember the true meaning of this day. A day to pay our respects to all those who have given their lives in our country's defense. God bless these brave heroes and their families.
Gary Sinise tweet media
English
599
7.6K
35.6K
458.4K
Chris Villarreal
Chris Villarreal@venerable_bede·
@JaneAFlegal Everything you've said in this thread is because of the flaws in the utility business model. For decades now utilities have blocked new entrants from bringing their own funding and tech to the party to protect their interests, not customers. That's what needs to change.
English
0
1
2
47
Jane Flegal
Jane Flegal@JaneAFlegal·
Until we agree on what we’re trying to solve, we’ll keep having the wrong fights and I’ll be bummed out. Now is a historic moment for these conversations and reforms and we can’t waste it on marginal stuff.
English
1
1
9
662
Jane Flegal
Jane Flegal@JaneAFlegal·
Okay. We do not have a shared problem definition on “electricity.” It’s fine to ask “are utilities greedy, “but that is not the question I think matters most. IMHO the right question is do we need to build to power and economic growth and decarb without screwing ratepayers?
Matt Stoller@matthewstoller

Where’s all your money going when you pay your electric bill? It’s not going to where they say it is. It’s not building a better grid, it’s going to a legal form of theft. open.substack.com/pub/mattstolle…

English
6
11
57
16.7K
Chris Villarreal retweetledi
Strictly 4 My X’ers
Strictly 4 My X’ers@Lizzs_Lockeroom·
Rest easy, Rob Base 🕊💙🙏🏾 I'll forever love this flowchart
Strictly 4 My X’ers tweet media
English
21
788
2.5K
39.1K
Chris Villarreal retweetledi
Matthew Yglesias
Matthew Yglesias@mattyglesias·
Forcing refiners to blend liquified corn into their gasoline is one of the dumbest policies on the books, raising the cost of food and fuel for nonexistent environmental benefits. slowboring.com/p/the-dumb-pol…
Matthew Yglesias tweet media
English
101
376
2.2K
112.9K
Josh Smith
Josh Smith@smithtjosh·
The next "green new deal" should look like Milton Friedman wrote it
Travis Fisher@ts_fisher

@RicOConnell8 These generous donors should feel free to redirect their giving to the Cato Institute (or me personally) I’m only half joking. At this point, free markets could be a bigger boost to clean energy than a regime of heavy regulation plus subsidies

English
3
0
14
1.9K
Chris Villarreal retweetledi
Alex Trembath
Alex Trembath@atrembath·
I actually think @JaneAFlegal's concerns about philanthropy are in a funny way compatible with arguments @deanwball, @JoinFAI, and others have made about the overly precautionary and procedural inclinations embedded in, among other things, public and public-private institutions of science and innovation. A huge amount of philanthropy goes towards reifying regulatory and state capacity functions that hinder expeditious drug trials, technology licensing, infrastructure permitting, etc. Philanthropically supported NGOs routinely insert themselves into the feedback loop between government investment and civic outcomes, making claims to enforcing "democratic accountability" when they're actually just enforcing their own ideological preferences. This is a way in which tax-exempt wealth can undermine democracy—rich patrons using philanthropic giving to implicitly or explicitly obstruct state capacity. Billions of dollars in private wealth are channeled towards protecting existing zoning regulations, opposing nuclear power plants and transmission lines, the list goes on. That's not to say that wealth would automatically be better spent by the government. But if the government is bad at investing marginal dollars in sci/tech/services/whatever, it's important to understand that philanthropy often contributes to why they're bad at it in the first place! All of which is to say, I think it's hard to categorically prefer the philanthropic decision makers over the government ones, or vice versa, without more specifics about the decision makers and the decisions. I'm optimistic about the (if still comparatively minuscule) fields of abundance and progress philanthropy, largely because they attack the exact problem of government dysfunction.
Dean W. Ball@deanwball

The answer to this strikes me as obvious: “yes.” Presumably OP is not saying, “this wealth should be spent on Porsches and Pateks instead of being spent on philanthropy!” Rather she seems to be hinting that the government should expropriate this wealth and spend it on . That’s what “in a democracy” is usually code for in contexts like this, by the way. It’s code for giving the government more money and power. Ironic, given the origins of American democracy. Anyway, no, the government would have no idea what to spend this money on. Statistically speaking, this fortune, in the hands of the state, would most likely be squandered on old people’s retirement benefits, interest on debt, and weapons. “In a democracy.” There are a ton of important things we will need to invest in to “make AI go well.” Long-range, bold, ambitious investments made by prudent and wise people. I do not know what species of delusion one must have to believe that the US government is well positioned to serve that role. America is fortunate to have a private sector and civil society that at least has a fighting chance of being up to the task. There are many things I hope government will do during the AI transformation, but the expropriation gestured at below needs much more thought and justification than “in a democracy”-style sloganeering.

English
3
1
16
2.4K
Chris Villarreal retweetledi
Travis Kavulla
Travis Kavulla@TKavulla·
8. On to the power supply side of the industry: Bring Your Own Generation is the way. Too bad it is literally unlawful in a majority of states!
English
3
6
32
4.2K
Jane Flegal
Jane Flegal@JaneAFlegal·
A lesson I have learned today in asking whether we have the appropriate scale of philanthropy is that a lot of people hate government.
English
5
1
39
2.5K
Chris Villarreal retweetledi
Travis Kavulla
Travis Kavulla@TKavulla·
As is so often the case in utility regulation, things that look like customer protection measures are really... ratebase protection rackets!
Travis Kavulla tweet media
English
2
7
35
2.4K
Ric O'Connell
Ric O'Connell@RicOConnell8·
I don't want to kill capacity markets. I just want to shrink their importance so they are small enough I can drown them in the bathtub.
English
3
1
26
2.8K
Chris Villarreal
Chris Villarreal@venerable_bede·
@duncancampbell Isn't that really the problem? They aren't designed for what's going on & when there is an opportunity for real & actual choice, the institutions dig in against it, b/c that's not in their nature. Bridges could be built to manage, but they have no incentive to do so.
GIF
English
0
0
1
58
Chris Villarreal retweetledi
Matthew Zeitlin
Matthew Zeitlin@MattZeitlin·
FERC Chair Laura Swett read the riot act to PJM at its annual meeting yesterday
Matthew Zeitlin tweet media
English
6
21
89
19.6K
Chris Villarreal retweetledi
Jeff Dennis
Jeff Dennis@EnergyLawJeff·
Bottom line: customers are paying more for transmission, but not seeing additional capacity or reduction in congestion costs. That means we're investing in the wrong things. We need planning reform and greater oversight of local transmission spending to address this conundrum. 3/
English
1
2
3
372