vikram
8K posts









91% lost money - Let’s check some real math (थोड़ा गणित करते हैं।)👇 91 out of 100 are losing money. (Ratio - 91:9) If you stop 10% of the loss makers (10% of 91 = 9 traders) from trading the ratio becomes 82:9. Which means 90% are still losing money. Stop another 10%. Ratio 74:9. 89% losing money. Stop another 10%. Ratio 67:9. 88% losing money. Stop another 10%. Ratio becomes 60:9. 87% losing money. In short percentages move really slowly. 91 loss makers have become 60, but 91% losing money has only moved to 87% losing money. Frankly, it is futile to run behind percentages. And if percentages is what we need to correct, the real answer is not is stopping the loss makers, but more about increasing the profit makers. Rather moving the Loss makers to becoming profitable is the true answer. If we have to move 91% loss makers to 85%, we need to either make 6 of those 91 loss makers profitable OR stop 40 loss makers from trading. Isn’t attacking these 6 easier? Real answer is only and only education. Banning may just not be a long term solution. Note: Regulators may have done a commendable job in bringing the loss ratio from 93% (basis paper released in Sep 24) to 91% (paper released in Jul 25). They have practically stopped 20% of loss makers from trading. This is huge. Some date to ponder. 🤔















