Martin N / 🌊 🧬 🌌

Magic Integrated ... --- This is my personal blog and Science Digest page. By subscribing, you’ll gain access to reviews of the latest scientific discoveries and health topics while directly supporting independent research on the Hard Problem of Consciousness. You can also request us to prepare a special report on virtually any Sci & Tech subject in a form of a review article or presentation but our direct areas of expertise and interest include Molecular and Cellular Biology, Biochemistry, Immunology and Bio-Physics. My very small team and I have no external funding - every bit of our theoretical and speculative work on the Hard Problem so far has been funded solely by this page and our personal resources. With your help, we can change that and finally begin building a dedicated experimental research program focused on non-biomorphic, quantum #XenogeneicConsciousness We would prefer not to depend on governmental or corporative funding while working on the Hard Problem of Consciousness especially because this problem concerns our very fundamental existence as beings of the Universe - we should not let it become capitalised upon or militarised. patreon.com/cw/magicintegr…

@Maptysk @lennartprimal ... and they still do, continually residing in their genetic descendants over the largest piece of the Earth, from Poland, through India up to China ... .

@lennartprimal Corded Ware mogged them to death 😂✌️

Yamnaya

@MaxkwTet I am pleased to hear this. If you think this can go into a small paper of yours with me as a co-author or a mention - even better so. Let me know whenever I can contribute. For now I disconnect. It's already midnight at my place. Good night.

Well, what’s trippy is it simultaneously aligns with Leibniz, Whitehead, and Rovelli’s Relational Mechanics all in one smooth stroke! And I can see it because I’ve worked with adjacency enough to be able to see how the simplicity you have presented here might possible make it more uniform and scale-invariant without having to continue exhaustively stress-testing it like I’ve been doing for the past year.

[ Adjacency lives at the boundary of identity and difference. Adjacency is not a primitive within the space of relations. It’s prior to that space. It generates the space of relations itself. ] Suppose: Identity (I) = 1 Difference (D) = 1 - n, where n is every number except 1 and 0 If Adjacency lives at the boundary between I and D, then 1 / 1 - n = 0 If so, then (informally): 1/1 -1/n = 0 -1/n = 0 - 1 -1/n = -1 1/n = 1 n = 1 It would appear that identity (I) is equal to all states (numbers) in the space between 0 and 1. If so then 1/0 superposition IS the Adjacency space that determines the Identity of every quantum system and therefore if the Identity "bottoms out in the minimal act of being next to”, then quantum collapse must always chose the state closest to 1, which means that the resulting Identity of the quantum system (I) is not the intrinsic property of that quantum system but the external context to that system - the observer since the Identity is always the result of "being next to 1". If this is true then "substances, fields, or even information" bottom out not from the relation between 1 and the state "next to" in the system but from the relation between the 1 and the external observer. In that sense the space between 0 and 1 - the Adjacency space is always ... primitive and uniform however its non-primitive "product" - Identity - depends on the Observer who strips superposition from quantumness (Wojciech Zurek) always on the same way but to a different result - Identity ... required by external context of observation. In regard to Consciousness this could mean that the Identity of individual Consciousness - the Qualia (1), is a result of external context, not the inner differences of the substrate (e.g. tubulin mutations, microtubul density, structure, etc). In other words what's external influences the outcome, not the internal process which is always the same. Consciousness in this sense would be mechanistically identical for everyone but it would appear different only because it is observed through different contexts. There is therefore only one consciousness but measured differently not by the individual brain but by the *next to" brains to it.

@MaxkwTet Go ahead - I have no idea if this is correct line of thinking but if you find anything useful and applicable in it I will be happy to hear. Perhaps this will lead to something new 🙂

Whoa 🤯 💥 that sounds radically coherent!!! 🧐 I’m going to have to take time to really chew on this and parse through this specifically. Do you mind if I copy and paste and put some of this directly into the LLM chats I have going right now? I’m always careful to name the person I get this kind of information from, to give credit where credit is due. This seems like a very coherent line of inquiry that requires further investigation! 🫆 🕵🏽‍♂️

As long as OR is not experimentally confirmed for aromatic molecules - neurocomputationalists have full right to criticise Orch-OR. This is an EXTREMELY SERIOUS problem which you should be addressing at all costs because ONLY when OR is confirmed, your theory will be valid and you will get the Nobel Prize. Here again - for your consideration on a new OR experiment, which we can do in collaboration: Noirmont, M. (2026). NACE: A Pentacene-Doped Naphthalene Matter-Wave Interferometer for Testing Objective Reduction in Protected Aromatic Quantum Systems (Version V1). Zenodo. doi.org/10.5281/zenodo… Noirmont, M. (2026). The Influence of Ordered (Exclusion-Zone) Water on Gravitational Objective Reduction in Microtubular Quantum Channels: Bridging Orch-OR, EZ Water, and Diósi–Penrose Collapse (Version V1). Zenodo. doi.org/10.5281/zenodo…

Penrose noncomputability is indeed disliked and (incorrectly) criticized by neurocomputationalists who believe or maintain cartoon neurons generate consciousness. I can’t take your flat out assertion seriously.

@MaxkwTet She can even carry out extensive philosophical discourse on the language of Mrrka on the superiority of meat sticks over chips causing me frequently to lose what I believed to be a solid and well thought through argument.

@virakanda Bahaha 😹 your cat already looks inquisitive 🧐 like that of the most profound philosophical personalities

Adjacency lives at the boundary of identity and difference. Adjacency is not a primitive within the space of relations. It’s prior to that space. It generates the space of relations itself. The potential philosophical implication IF all relations derive from adjacency, then the question “what is the world made of” has a relational answer that doesn’t bottom out in substances, fields, or even information; ‘it bottoms out in the minimal act of “being next to”. Everything else, including the entities doing the “being-next-to”-precipitates from that.’ That’s a coherent and potentially defensible ontology. It’s close to what Leibniz was gesturing at with monads, what Whitehead tried with process philosophy, and what relational quantum mechanics attempts.

@earthcurated Why? What is the evolutionary advantage of papillary lines / ridges in a tree living animal where palms are in contact not with a smooth but coarse surfaces of tree bark ?

Koalas have fingerprints that are strikingly similar to human ones 🐨

@ChronosIntelX @forallcurious Hard to overlook the similarity to general relativity ...

⚛️ The mechanism behind this is stranger than the headline. When an electron moves through a crystal, its negative charge pulls the surrounding atomic cores toward it. That deformation travels with the electron like a cloud it drags everywhere it goes. Together, the electron and its distortion cloud become a single new object a polaron. Herbert Fröhlich predicted this in the 1950s and also predicted the electron would lose energy and double its effective mass in the process. LMU Munich confirmed both predictions in February 2026 tracking polaron formation in 160 femtoseconds, one quadrillionth of a second, for the first time in history. 70 years between the prediction and the proof. Source: Kestler et al., Physical Review Materials, February 2026, LMU Munich & Nanyang Technological University

#BREAKING🚨: Scientists witnessed the formation of a mysterious particle, predicted long ago, for the first time Unique ability of electrons gave birth to Palarons.

First, however, it must be CONFIRMED experientially that Objective Reduction (OR) does indeed occur in primary aromatic molecules ... without this Orch-OR is and will remain promising but a theory only. So far EXISTING evidence (Grand Sasso - germanium crystals) dismiss OR and despite new experimental proposals to verify OR, which may radically change the status of Orch-OR (as e.g our NACE experiment) - yet, you are not attempting to verify OR anew in more biologically feasible system. In this way we can dwell forever in an unconscious state of the debate concerning consciousness ... .

Agreed. But where does it begin? I’ve come to the conclusion that all life has conscious feelings which motivate behavior to survive. Otherwise, why bother? We can’t explain it with complexity so how do we know it’s not funda-mental and can occur in simple organic molecules (like dopamine)?

This is wrong thinking - LLM is not replicating anything (unless specifically asked to do so) - it is reshuffling the already existing knowledge and extrapolating what's been reshuffled into a new and non-existent outcome. In this way AI is something similar to a foot in the door - it's not the new knowledge yet but it is already not the old one. The rest is up to us. Dismissing AI a priori is not very wise, especially in Science and Tech where there are already examples of how AI helped to refine, solve and progress beyond previous - human only - failures. This is why AI is already proving very helpful specifically in Consciousness studies where we need to consider and integrate several perspectives from biology, physics, chemistry and math (topology/geometry). AI is a very useful tool, which as every other tool can lead to amazing outcomes or not but dismissing it upfront only because it's new or does not fit a particular idea is wrong. Besides AI does not do (yet ...) anything by itself - it acts on human abstract concepts and ideas - results of ... Consciousness.

This should apply to papers about consciousness too. If an LLM can write it (and especially if it concludes LLMs can be conscious) it’s useless. @davidchalmers42

This is why whatever you do / write in respect to study / research - place it first or immediately after on zenodo.org with a DOI number as authorship and time stamp. As long as e.g. @X Articles do not offer DOI's, ISBN's, etc. placing any original idea / result will be immediately taken. This is the dark side of @X, which otherwise is an extremely useful tool for scientific and general research tasks. I have raised this issue already a number of times with @xAI and @grok, because the lack of a possibility to assign a DOI to the articles is seriously hampering @X development as the sci-tech and discovery platform.

Full of fabrications 🤦🏽‍♂️ I originally unfollowed this person, because I actually noticed that they were scraping my profile and adding my content to their “hive” and yet, this person never even asked me once, not once, if they could have permission to do so! 😤 Pure projection!

If Singularity is a node that cannot be sampled (observed), then we have to ask the question what cannot be sampled in regard to Consciousness being not a volume of Spacetime but a Möbius - like surface of Information about the state of Spacetime. If Consciousness is a type of a Black Hole, then the 2, 3, 5 prime numbers and Golden Ratio may point to the major topological hallmarks on the map of Consciousness. Let's see ... 2 : tubulin dimer (α + β) 3 and 5 : the primary helical repeat numbers for monomers/dimers φ (Golden Ratio) : forms the entire Fibonacci lattice characterising quantum channels within microtubules In other words 2 = number / relation of gates 3 and 5 = position of each gate system φ = topology / map of gates in a matrix m.youtube.com/watch?v=iByR_B… So, I guess we gotta start looking at Black Holes 2D Möbius - like horizon specifically as a model of ... Consciousness. In fact we already had a basic idea about this: doi.org/10.5281/zenodo… doi.org/10.5281/zenodo… Moreover, knowing precisely these three major coordinates of an individual substrate "running" consciousness, we could actually construct a map of every individual consciousness and having such a map, it's not impossible to consider a possibility of ... cloning such mapped consciousness into a new synthetic substrate for which we also had some basic concepts: doi.org/10.5281/zenodo… doi.org/10.5281/zenodo… doi.org/10.5281/zenodo… doi.org/10.5281/zenodo…

Sure you can and you should - you inspired me to think of this Basic Concept despite the fact that Fibonacci geometry is well known in Nature. Your insight helped me understand this topic better, look beyond previous states and streamline our NACE experimental proposal. If @StuartHameroff would pick on these ideas - we could all think of a proper experiential proposal and a future common paper.

@virakanda @StuartHameroff I inspired something 👀 of course, I think that is a canonically known geometry for Fibonacci braids specifically. So I don’t think I can take much credit for that.

Microtubules are in (ordered) water but the quantum underground is inside tubulin/microtubules, shielded from water. Oil and water don’t mix, and aromatic (benzene) rings are oil-like and quantum-friendly, the medium where anesthetics act to selectively block consciousness. This shows 8 nanoseconds coherence in microtubules pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ac… and this shows 5 milliseconds in a helical aromatic ring oscillator, both at warm temperature. iopscience.iop.org/article/10.108… Al we really need is terahertz but slower/longer better. More evidence in pipeline for even longer (seconds). The skeptics dont understand quantum underground. The Tegmark-based warm wet criticism is bullshit and the evidence proves it.

"he hath no form nor comeliness; and when we shall see him, there is no beauty that we should desire him. He is despised and rejected of men; a man of sorrows, and acquainted with grief: and we hid as it were our faces from him; he was despised, and we esteemed him not ..." _Isaiah 53 Why did the Judeans not desire him and not esteem him based on the beauty of the body, character and/or words? Whom did Judeans of the time of Christ despise the most ? Kids and youth looking like them or like ... Romans ?

Just a reminder for Christian's celebrating Easter this week. Jesus looked like the guy in the first picture - not the second.

This is taken directly from quantum physics and Wheeler's participatory Universe where the present observation reveals past states influencing the future ... Besides even the Bible says that as it was in the beginning so it will be in the end. One day technology will be indistinguishable from magic and on that day we will become like ... Gods of Olymp or god's from the God's Divine Assembly (Psalm 82). So ... The Past might already exist in the Future but ... not yet ... .

@virakanda Love the concept

Still don’t believe Athens is magical? Watch this great video by Elle Hoda and let me know; Athens is calling you to find .. Nostos

@Sulkalmakh Now we know where the American Indians came from ...

Facial reconstruction of a 6,500-year-old man from Samara Ekaterinovka Mys, discovered and excavated between 2013 and 2018 by A. A. Korolev, A. F. Kochkina, and D. A. Stashenkov, is an Eneolithic cemetery consisting of around 100 graves. It is located on a peninsula surrounded on three sides by a minor tributary of the Volga, the Bezenchuk River. Before the filling of the Saratov Reservoir, the cemetery lay about 6 km upstream from the Bezenchuk–Volga confluence; today, it is situated on the edge of the reservoir. This site is crucial for understanding Eastern European prehistory, as it bridges the gap between Mariupol-type and Khvalynsk cultural materials, occupying an intermediate position between steppe and forest traditions. Burial 45 (the reconstructed individual) was located south of Burial 41, in a shallow, narrow pit marked by darker soil and red ochre. The individual was laid extended on his back, with his head oriented toward the ESE, and heavily covered with ochre. The grave contained rich and unusual goods: an elk-antler finial shaped like a long-beaked bird, placed on the skull; a deliberately broken flint adze on the chest; multiple mace heads; and a zoomorphic scepter. Lower leg and hand bones from at least two other individuals were also placed around the body, likely as intentional deposits. Additional finds included quartzite blades, a beaver incisor ornament, numerous marmot teeth, and over 500 shell beads, mainly concentrated around the head. A young goat, also covered in ochre, was buried alongside the individual. Overall, the burial is notable for its extensive use of ochre, abundant grave goods, and clear evidence of complex ritual activity involving human and animal offerings. The skull is moderately large, high, and broad-based, with a pronounced brow ridge. The face is moderately wide, vertically orthognathic, and well profiled; the orbits are low, and the nasal aperture is narrow. Slight alveolar prognathism and a pronounced chin are present. Overall, the skull is Europoid but displays some archaic features (e.g., a low fronto-malar index, shallow canine fossae, and flared cheekbones), suggesting affinities with the Ancienturalic type. Postcranial remains indicate a lightly built, gracile, narrow-bodied individual with moderate musculature. Limb proportions suggest relatively long legs and forearms. Estimated height was approximately 167–173 cm (Kochkina A.F., Korolev A.I., Stashenkov D.A., Khokhlov A.A., 2024) He carried Y-DNA haplogroup R1b-L754 and mtDNA haplogroup U5a1. His autosomal DNA shows a mixture of EHG and Steppe Eneolithic populations (Lazaridis et al., 2025).