Vincent Martinez

179 posts

Vincent Martinez banner
Vincent Martinez

Vincent Martinez

@vncntmrtnz

Orange County, CA Katılım Nisan 2010
317 Takip Edilen125 Takipçiler
hunter
hunter@hxxntrr·
There's a free 5-minute IRS form that banks treat like a second financial identity. With a clean 720 score, that file can get $250,000+ at 0% interest. Most people beg for loans at 12% because nobody showed them the other door. I made the full $250K funding board public. Like + comment "credit" and i'll send it to you for free (must rt, and be following)
English
155
96
314
22.2K
*Walter Bloomberg
*Walter Bloomberg@DeItaone·
$TSLA - TESLA: ROBOTAXI NOW ROLLING OUT IN DALLAS & HOUSTON
English
66
107
1.4K
164.2K
Vincent Martinez
Vincent Martinez@vncntmrtnz·
@Vol888 I hope the weekend news about the Straight doesn’t dampen this for Monday.
English
0
0
1
51
Dave
Dave@GamewithDave·
For anyone who used a computer between 1990 & 2005… what’s the one game you still think about?
English
40.6K
723
14.3K
10.5M
Vincent Martinez
Vincent Martinez@vncntmrtnz·
@Mr_Derivatives That $14k is trying to catch up to $50k where it started before the person learned about options lol
English
1
0
7
653
Heisenberg
Heisenberg@Mr_Derivatives·
The average Robinhood account size is roughly ~$14,000. Roughly. On Fintwit, young traders are lured into this false sense of “being left behind” feeling when they see all these massive account sizes and profit screenshots (50% of em probably fakes too). This then leads them to take unnecessary degen/yolo/full port WSB type risks to play “catchup”. Ask yourself this, who are you “catching up” to? If it is for clout, no one cares. Truly. Let me tell you this, you are NOT behind. I would rather you grind your way higher with that $14,000 then try to full port all in with a 1% chance of hitting it big with a lucky call. Just imho. But again, your money your rules.
English
102
27
759
104.1K
Vincent Martinez retweetledi
StockMarket.News
StockMarket.News@_Investinq·
Mark Cuban just said something that should change how you think about the next 10 years. He called AI “the great democratization of knowledge.” Cuban says there are two types of people using AI right now. One group uses it to learn more and the other uses it to think less. Same tool, two completely different futures. The first group is building things nobody saw coming. Teaching themselves to code filing patents and launching companies from a kitchen table. Not because they’re geniuses because AI gave them a tutor that never sleeps and never judges. The barrier to entry for almost everything just dropped to near zero. @mcuban has been saying this for months. Any kid in a basement can now build something world-changing. The playing field didn’t just level, it completely flipped . The people who win from here aren’t the ones with the best degrees or the biggest budgets. They’re the ones who stay curious and the ones who use AI to ask better questions instead of skipping the question entirely. The most powerful learning tool ever created is sitting on your phone right now. It costs nothing and it’s available to everyone. The only question is what you do with it and that part is entirely up to you.
English
21
56
178
36.9K
Vincent Martinez
Vincent Martinez@vncntmrtnz·
@Mr_Derivatives I’d love to see it that low also. But the more I see articles about it crashing further, the less likely I think it’ll happen.
English
1
0
1
87
Aisha Huma🔮
Aisha Huma🔮@Aishacuo·
CPI data to be announced later today Expect some heavy volatility in the markets These numbers will determine a lot $TSLA $NVDA $QQQ $META $COIN $MSTR #BTC $AVGO $GEV $ORCL $ARM $NFLX $SEZL $SMR $CBRL $ASTS $AMD $MGNI $HIMS $CRDO $PSIX $OSCR $BRBR $NBIS $AMPL $GSAT
Aisha Huma🔮 tweet media
English
1
0
1
212
Vincent Martinez retweetledi
Dustin
Dustin@r0ck3t23·
Alex Karp just said what every other tech CEO is terrified to admit: the world doesn’t split three ways. It splits two. And second place is extinction. Europe watches. Everyone else becomes a customer. The fight is binary. America or China. One owns the future’s operating system. The other lives inside it, powerless. Karp: “There are only two cultures that are going to win in the next year. It’s going to be us or China.” Technology isn’t neutral. The builder’s values get hardcoded into everything. If we don’t own the chips, the models, the infrastructure, the beliefs embedded in the next century won’t be freedom or rights. They’ll be surveillance and control. Karp: “If we are not the ones controlling the violence, we will not be dictating the rule of law.” AI is a weapon system. Not potentially. Inherently. Restraint doesn’t buy peace. It guarantees defeat. If the Constitution matters, if speech matters, if any of it matters, America has to win technologically. Power doesn’t negotiate values. It imposes them. Thinking caution earns respect is suicidal delusion. The enemy isn’t slowing down for ethics debates. They’re building at war speed while we workshop guardrails. Karp: “No one is coming to defend you. You have to defend yourself.” No cavalry. No referees. No shared humanity saving the day. Just two civilizations in a cage match for permanent control. Outbuild them or surrender everything. Not eventually. Now. Because losing this race doesn’t mean second place. It means your children grow up under a system that doesn’t even pretend you have rights.
English
418
1.6K
7K
588.3K
Vincent Martinez retweetledi
Financelot
Financelot@FinanceLancelot·
It shocks me that people are just figuring out Scott Bessent is a genius. He collapsed multiple national currencies with George Soros over the last 30 years via arbitrage. He was literally installed in this position to conduct economic warfare on behalf of the United States.
Financelot@FinanceLancelot

Scott Bessent is brilliant & ruthless. If you're conducting economic warfare, this is the 5 star general you want conducting Forex. He was instrumental in collapsing the British pound in 1992 (Black Wed), 1997 Asian Financial Crisis & Japanese yen in 2013 youtube.com/watch?v=xENnM4…

English
574
3.9K
31.4K
2.9M
Cole Grinde
Cole Grinde@GrindeOptions·
Can someone explain to me like I’m 12 years old as to why stocks are falling after stellar jobs numbers? 🤔
Cole Grinde tweet media
English
1.5K
55
1.4K
1M
Vincent Martinez
Vincent Martinez@vncntmrtnz·
Picked up some $hood yesterday in ah at $80. Looking for a bounce to 90 the next few days.
English
0
0
0
30
Vincent Martinez retweetledi
The Money Cruncher, CPA
The Money Cruncher, CPA@money_cruncher·
🚨 BREAKING: You can now sign up for the Trump Account for your kids. Here are all the details:
English
46
157
2.4K
942.3K
Vincent Martinez retweetledi
Teslaconomics
Teslaconomics@Teslaconomics·
I might get some pushback for this, but I honestly think a lot of parents, especially in places like Silicon Valley and especially many Asian parents, are training their kids for the wrong world. I see kids at the age of 7-8 packed with after-school math, more reading, more test prep, with the goal to make them “smarter.” But from my perspective, living deep in the AI world every single day, I’m pretty sure raw intelligence is about to become a commodity. Very soon, AI is going to do math better than the best mathematician, it’ll diagnose better than top doctors around the world, it’ll draft contracts better than elite lawyers, and it’ll learn faster than any PhD, instantly, endlessly, and without any fatigue. All of that knowledge will live right in your pocket. So think about it… if we’re raising kids to win by being “the smartest in the room,” we’re really training them for something that’s already being replaced. In my opinion, this is a waste of time, $, and effort. What I focus on with my kids is very different. I care about willpower. I care about passion. I care about loving something enough to stick with it, especially when it feels hard. And as a Dad, my job is to support that, whatever it is, and teach them to never give up. I could be totally wrong though… But when I look at where AI is headed, I don’t think the future belongs to the kid who memorized the most formulas or did the most math problems, etc. In the future, I think the winners are going to be kids who 1/ can push through frustration 2/ can stay curious 3/ can keep going deeper into their passions than others 4/ can use AI tools to build cool things 5/ has the will power to never give up In this day and age, school doesn’t really teach this and I don’t think after-school classes teach that either. I don’t think any of this can really be taught at school tbh, it’s something that is developed inside the home through the environment we as parents cultivate. In a world where AI will help you build anything, create anything, and learn anything instantly, I don’t think the real edge will be intelligence anymore like the past. The edge will come down to grit, discipline, emotional strength, and to keep going as others quit. AI will be so deeply woven into our kids’ lives whether we like it or not. That part is unavoidable. However, what is avoidable is raising kids who only know how to follow instructions, chase grades, and wait for approval. I always tell my kids, I don’t care what grade you get in a test. I care that you know what you got wrong, why you got it wrong, and what you’re doing to avoid that mistake in the future. Because I firmly believe in the future, the kids who will thrive the most will be the ones who want something badly enough to go after it, who aren’t afraid to fail, and those who know how to leverage AI. Just my two cents. But if we’re serious about the future, I think it’s time parents start training for that world, NOT the one we grew up in.
English
239
279
2.3K
547.8K
Vincent Martinez retweetledi
Dustin
Dustin@r0ck3t23·
Jensen Huang said if he were a student today, he wouldn’t prioritize coding. He’d prioritize learning how to talk to AI. Most people treat AI like Google. Type a question, get an answer, move on. Huang sees it differently. He calls it “expertise in artistry,” which sounds dramatic but makes sense when you think about it. The real skill isn’t using AI. It’s knowing what to ask for and how to refine it. “Learning to interact with AI is not unlike being really good at asking questions.” If you’re a doctor, can you use AI to catch diagnoses you’d miss? If you’re a lawyer, can you sharpen arguments faster than your competition? The leverage comes from pairing what you know with how well you can direct the tool. Domain expertise multiplied by AI fluency equals amplification. Without the expertise, the AI is just noise. Without fluency, you’re leaving most of the capability on the table. The question isn’t whether AI will replace you. It’s whether someone who knows how to use it better will.
English
208
1.4K
7.3K
784.9K