voxtechbit

@rayandabbagh @foley2k2 @israeliswrite @Meta Without a doubt!!!

@foley2k2 @voxtechbit @israeliswrite @Meta you think they track your keyboard?

wait what the hell @meta reached out to interview my friend for a senior SWE role i’m genuinely confused right now, didn’t layoffs just happen yesterday? it’s crazy how disconnected these institutions can feel sometimes. there are probably people from those 8,000 layoffs who could do the exact same job, with less onboarding friction too and realistically, it’s probably cheaper to retain existing talent than replace it corporate hiring logic makes zero sense from the outside

@rayandabbagh @israeliswrite @Meta Yep. Strange times.

@voxtechbit @israeliswrite @Meta yeah that's what most labs are doing though

@foley2k2 @israeliswrite @rayandabbagh @Meta I’m surprised they think it’ll work. It’s so easy to poison LLM’s.

@voxtechbit @israeliswrite @rayandabbagh @Meta Highlight some text, type some characters, hit ctrl + z, ctrl + y, ctrl + shift tab, etc. Noise in the stream could be fun for training.

@israeliswrite @rayandabbagh @Meta Completely dystopian and probably completed accurate. Hire people just to transfer professional skills to the model. Evil.

At this point, it seems they just want the data. Once they hire and get the data they need from new hires, then we get the next round of layoffs..lol, like Zuck said - instead of training on data from outside, let's train on our own engineers, so basically the screening would be to get more "data engineers" tagged as software engineers 😀

@SurvivalGN It's gay.

What happened to Subnautica 2? The game peaked at almost 500k players on launch day and lost 70% of its player base within a week.

@Fletche33881557 @Polymarket This is most important to tell the normies. They talk about AI like it is alive. They have no clue that each word is token prediction. They don't understand that responses are generated and not an interactive, back and forth reasoning/conversation. They have NO IDEA how it works.

@Polymarket Its going to be funny when everyone starts to realize its an LLM not AI. They have spent 1T so far and its still not AGI...They keep training it so should be any day now....

JUST IN: Starbucks retires AI inventory tool across North America after it reportedly miscounted & mislabeled store items.

@Polymarket Why don't they vibe code the fix and layoff 23,000 people to make up the losses? Starbucks is OBVIOUSLY behind the times.

@Xarina_2 @PanopticonBot @uncledoomer Yeah because you're the target audience for jew daycare. Are women retarded?

@PanopticonBot @uncledoomer I am at my job to make money but also to develop a product for people. I like my job and colleagues.

its so funny that men found out that this was what women were doing at their jobs and the men went "im crashing this economy with no survivors"

@RealBrianAtWork @uncledoomer This is incredible.

@uncledoomer Some people will say it’s AI

@AtkJustin @theREALhappyMOM Sit down boy. Or we'll put you in your cage.

@voxtechbit @theREALhappyMOM Chud

People say they are now niggermaxxing. You know, saying ‘nigger’ at every opportunity. I just have one thing to say.. Welcome to the party 🥳 #freechud

@_Foolsandfolly_ @damnidc__ 53k likes. She was crying for the dopamine.

@damnidc__ She is so devastated she thought to set the camera up and film herself. Performative anguish.

This is so sad.

@damnidc__ She better get back to work ASAP or her bosses will replace her with AI even sooner. Work isn't worth missing these moments.

@WearForbidden Woah. This is incredible.

Kramer begins to notice👀

@mtrigby @DJ_CURFEW You don't think?! 🤣😂

@voxtechbit @DJ_CURFEW Naturally, he didn't "write" it, as such.

Today we reduced headcount by 22%. The business is the strongest it's ever been. So I think it's important to be direct about what I'm seeing and why. First, I made this decision and I own it. I did it because the way to operate at the highest level of productivity is changing, and to win the future, ClickUp needs to change with it. Second, this wasn't about cutting costs. Most savings from this change will flow directly back into the people who stay. We'll be introducing million-dollar salary bands. If you create outsized impact using AI, you'll be paid outside of traditional bands. Most importantly, I have the deepest gratitude for those affected. We're doing this from a position of strength specifically so we can take care of people properly. Everyone affected receives a package aimed at honoring their contributions and easing the transition. I only see two options: wait for this to play out gradually in the market or be honest about what I'm seeing and act proactively. THE 100X ORGANIZATION The primary change is that we're restructuring around what I call 100x org. The goal is 100x output. The roles required to build at the highest level are fundamentally different than they were a year ago. Incremental improvements to existing systems won't get us there. We need new ones. That means creating enough disruption to rebuild rather than iterate on what's already broken. The common narrative is that AI makes everyone more productive. It doesn't. Many of the workflows of today, if left unchanged, create bottlenecks in AI systems. These roles will evolve. But waiting for that to happen naturally means falling behind now. The 100x org is actually heavily dependent on people - infinitely more than today. This is only possible with 10x people that have embraced and adopted new ways of working. THE BUILDERS, AGENT MANAGERS, AND FRONT-LINERS — THE BUILDERS: 10X ENGINEERS I don't think most companies have internalized what's actually happening with AI in engineering. The common narrative is that AI makes all engineers more productive. That may be true in isolation, but at an organization level - that is the farthest thing from reality. Here's what we've validated recently at ClickUp: the great engineers, the ones who can orchestrate, architect, and review, are becoming 100x engineers. They're not writing code. They're directing agents that write code. The skill is judgment. AI makes the best engineers wildly more productive, and everyone else using AI slows these engineers down. Think about it - the bottlenecks are (1) orchestration - telling AI what to do, and (2) reviewing - what AI did. Everything is leapfrogged and no longer needed. So who do you want orchestrating and reviewing code? And how do you want your best engineers to spend their time? If your best engineers are spending time reviewing other people's code, then this is inherently an inefficient bottleneck. These engineers can review their agent's code much faster than reviewing human code. The new world is about enabling your 10x engineers to become 100x. The wrong strategy is to push every engineer to use infinite tokens. Companies doing this are celebrating 500% more pull requests. But customer outcomes don't match the volume of code being generated. I call this the great reckoning of AI coding, and every company will face this soon if not already. More code is just another bottleneck to the best engineers, and ultimately to your company's impact as well. — THE BUILDERS: 10X PRODUCT MANAGERS Product management and design roles are merging. Designers that have customer focus, become more like product managers. And product managers that have intuition for UX become more like designers. The bottleneck of user research is gone. It takes us just one mention of an agent to kickoff research and analyze results. The bottleneck of product <> design iteration is also gone. The product builder iterates on their own, along with agents and skills that ensure alignment with quality and strategy. Also controversial today - I believe that the wrong strategy is to have your PMs shipping code - that just introduces another bottleneck that the best engineers will waste their time on. To be clear, PMs should be coding but they should do this in a playground to iterate, validate, and scope. That code should not go to production. Everything outside of managing systems, orchestrating AI, and reviewing output becomes a bottleneck. That's why the other roles that are critical along with these are the systems managers (to reduce bottlenecks) along with a bottleneck you can't replace - customer meeting time. — THE SYSTEM MANAGERS Ironically, the people that automate their jobs with AI will always have a job. They become owners of the AI systems - agent managers. We have many examples of these people at ClickUp. The underlying systems in which we operate are absolutely critical to get right. I think most companies are delusional to think they can iterate on existing systems and compete in this new world. You must create enough disruption so that old systems are deprecated entirely. If there's any definition for 'AI native' that's what it is. — THE FRONT-LINERS In a world that will become saturated with AI communication, the human touch will matter more than anything to customers. This is a bottleneck that you shouldn't replace - even when agents are high enough quality to do video meetings. One-on-one meeting time with customers is something that shouldn't be automated. The systems around the meetings should be - so that front-liners spend nearly 100% of their time with customers. REWARDING 100X IMPACT In a world where companies are able to do so much more with less, where does that excess money go? In our case, much of the savings in this new operating model will flow directly back to those that enabled it. We must reward people that create productivity accordingly. This aligns incentives on both sides. Plus, in a world where your best people create 100x impact, you can't afford to lose them. You should aim to retain these employees for decades. The context they have and their ability to efficiently orchestrate and review will be nearly impossible to replace. Compensation bands of today should be thrown out the door. We're introducing $1 million cash/year salary bands with a path available to nearly everyone in the company if they produce 100x impact by creating or managing AI systems. THE FUTURE Nearly every company will make changes like these. The ones that do it proactively will define what comes next. The future is not fewer people. It's different work, new roles, and better rewards for those who embrace it. We're already seeing entirely new roles emerge, like Agent Managers, that didn't exist a year ago. ClickUp is positioning to lead this shift, not just internally, but for our customers too. I've never been more certain about where we're headed.

@poojeetstreet Damn. If he was willing to change his religion, we could've used him.

Spykee job interview with a hidden scientist who puts his screwdriver everywhere.

@SeedOilDsrspctr IDK but I'm down for some White Racial Terror

Unless there are some clips I haven’t seen…. This makes me wonder if most of History is fake

@DJ_CURFEW @PKMerlott Nobody believes this.

Actually we had about 15 of our best engineers rebuild frontend architecture last week. Normally this would take 2 years but we were able to do it in a week. Much of the regressions we had in the past were from too many people touching the code without full context. We will be shipping those improvements soon

@AfroMidnite @ryxcommar @DJ_CURFEW Bro can't stop me I'm going to 10000x and pwn you

@ryxcommar @DJ_CURFEW I will simply 1000x output

@PurpleK9000 @DJ_CURFEW This would have been a WAY better announcement. Which CEO will be BRAVE and truly INNOVATIVE to be the first to replace THEMSELVES with AI???

@DJ_CURFEW If Ai is such a great enhancer of human ability, then AI should run the company. Imagine a 100x Agent CEO. that drives shareholder value and only shareholder value.