Siva

257 posts

Siva banner
Siva

Siva

@web3butwhy

Researching stablecoin payout ops. Notes on rails, FX, off-ramps, and reconciliation.

India Katılım Ekim 2021
47 Takip Edilen19 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Siva
Siva@web3butwhy·
Stablecoins made cross-border settlement faster. But the hard operational questions remain: - did the beneficiary receive the right amount? - which rail failed? - where did fees and FX move? - which provider reference maps to which payout? - what breaks at month-end reconciliation? I’m researching this from the operator side. If you run stablecoin payouts, off-ramps, contractor payroll, or payout ops, I’d love to compare notes.
English
0
2
3
114
Siva
Siva@web3butwhy·
Brazil’s eFX rule seems targeted at one specific flow: BRL in → stablecoin rail → fiat payout And probably the reverse too. The concern is obvious: Brazil is seeing massive usage of dollar stablecoins for B2B/cross-border payments - reportedly $6B–$8B/month. If USD stablecoins become the default settlement layer, the central bank loses FX visibility and monetary control. Maybe this pushes the market toward regulated BRL stablecoins. But even then, the key question remains: Does the stablecoin sit inside the official FX/reporting framework, or does it bypass it?
CoinDesk@CoinDesk

🇧🇷 LATEST: Brazil's central bank bans stablecoin and crypto settlement in cross-border payments, effective October 1.

English
1
0
0
37
Siva
Siva@web3butwhy·
@shiffgil eFX ban might be the first step.
English
0
0
1
5
Gil Shiff
Gil Shiff@shiffgil·
@web3butwhy Brazil may signal the next wave for stablecoin regulation. $6-8B/month in cross-border B2B volume is impossible to ignore. Regulators might try to control or limit it, not kill it - but the trade finance efficiency gains are too significant to shut down.
English
1
0
1
9
Siva
Siva@web3butwhy·
@insider0x Local stablecoins are inevitable. Domestic B2B or cross-border? That depends on whether they fit inside the central bank’s FX/reporting framework.
English
0
0
1
50
Romain Huet
Romain Huet@romainhuet·
Happy Friday! We just shipped Codex pets. Adopt one of the 8 defaults, or ask Codex to install the hatch-pet skill and create your own. Drop yours below, let’s meet your pet! 🐾
English
84
23
531
58.5K
Siva
Siva@web3butwhy·
Meet chibi luffy - my codex pet. It took me 30 mins to hatch and full codex 5h limit. 100% worth it. Easily one of the best things codex have ever done.
Siva tweet media
English
1
1
4
268
Siva
Siva@web3butwhy·
Stablecoin neobanks aren’t selling crypto; they’re selling a better dollar account to people banks underserve.
English
0
0
1
23
Siva
Siva@web3butwhy·
_____ is a financial technology platform, not a bank.
English
0
0
0
19
Siva
Siva@web3butwhy·
thats true but isn’t this exactly what the GENIUS Act tries to prevent? If payment stablecoin issuers can’t pass reserve yield directly to holders, then the yield has to come from somewhere else. So how is this being handled in practice today? Tokenized T-bills? Money-market wrappers? Exchange/wallet rewards? DeFi lending? And for the holder, what’s the actual risk? Are they just holding stables, or are they taking fund risk, smart-contract risk, duration risk, counterparty risk, or staking/lending risk?
English
0
0
2
157
andrew chapello
andrew chapello@chapello·
The reason stablecoin adoption goes vertical from here isn't transfer fees. It's yield. USD sitting in a corporate treasury today: ~0%, plus a 3-day clearing tax. USD sitting in a programmable wallet tomorrow: 4-5% APY, settles in seconds, available 24/7. "Free transactions" got the headlines. "Yield on idle cash" wins the CFO meeting.
English
12
1
49
4.2K
Siva
Siva@web3butwhy·
B2B has a clear reason to adopt crypto: faster settlement, lower fees, better cross-border payments, and easier treasury movement. But for end users, what is the real motivation? Is it cheaper payments? Global access? Rewards? Ownership? Privacy? Or something else entirely? Consumer adoption won’t happen because “it’s crypto.” It happens when crypto becomes the invisible rail behind a product that is obviously better. Curious what others think.
English
0
2
3
18
Siva
Siva@web3butwhy·
@cryptosmart121 Glad to see neobanks UX being appreciated. What are the perks you most enjoy? Yield? Acceptance or something else entirely?
English
0
0
0
11
Smart 🎯
Smart 🎯@cryptosmart121·
I have decided to transition fully from traditional bank cards to crypto. ​I will be using Plasma One specifically. ​Going forward, all my daily transactions will run through it. ​It's time to move 🕊
English
5
0
14
647
Siva
Siva@web3butwhy·
I have a really good feeling about 2026. Stablecoin use cases are becoming real. B2B companies are starting to adopt stablecoins because they solve painful settlement problems: speed, cost, liquidity, and cross-border friction. The missing piece has been UX. Now we’re seeing a new wave of neobanks and fintechs building user-facing products that make stablecoin payments feel as simple as everyday payments. The winners won’t just build crypto apps. They’ll build payment systems people use every day.
English
0
1
3
21
Siva
Siva@web3butwhy·
@BobbyThakkar They’re getting better. Any decent neobank has passable onboarding process. It might not to be up to the products like Revoult. But, hey, we are getting there.
English
0
0
2
402
Bobby Thakkar
Bobby Thakkar@BobbyThakkar·
stablecoins work. the onboarding doesn't can't put a normal person through a 6-step KYC flow and call it the future of payments
English
43
12
194
13.5K
Siva
Siva@web3butwhy·
@chapello that would solve one of the biggest ops problems for neobanks, global payroll, and accounting teams dealing with stablecoin flows. will be watching for the announcements.
English
0
0
1
31
andrew chapello
andrew chapello@chapello·
@web3butwhy yes -- launched Stablecoin Account earlier this year and shipping more on the reconciliation side soon. the goal is making the stablecoin layer indistinguishable from how finance teams already work in Ramp.
English
1
0
1
110
andrew chapello
andrew chapello@chapello·
CFOs aren't buying faster rails. They're buying automation. "Money moves in 10 seconds" is not the wedge. "Every payment auto-matches to invoice, vendor, GL entry, and tax category before close on the 5th" is. That's what we're laser focused on at Ramp. Not faster chains -- shorter closes.
English
5
4
40
4.3K
Siva
Siva@web3butwhy·
The unsolved problem in stablecoin infra isn’t speed. It’s not custody. It’s not even compliance. It’s that the chain and the ERP describe the same transfer in two completely different languages. One sees hashes, wallets, blocks, gas, fills. The other sees debits, credits, entities, cost centers, journal entries. The next great stablecoin infra company won’t just move money. It will define the schema both sides agree on.
English
0
1
2
33
Siva
Siva@web3butwhy·
While digging into stablecoin rails lately, one thing stands out: India’s payment settlement stack is wildly ahead of most of the world. UPI is interoperable by design. Pay from PhonePe, receive on Google Pay. No wallet silos. ACH in the US isn’t even a clean comparison - it overlaps with NEFT + NACH. But even then: NEFT runs 24/7 in frequent batches, while ACH still takes 1–3 days. IMPS? Fully real-time bank-to-bank. For everyday payments at scale, India quietly built one of the most advanced financial rails globally.
English
0
1
3
63