dave

30 posts

dave

dave

@wigglydtrain

software engineer

boston Katılım Ocak 2025
129 Takip Edilen0 Takipçiler
Ryan Brewer
Ryan Brewer@ryanbrewer·
Sadly, too early is still wrong
English
1
0
2
168
dave
dave@wigglydtrain·
ANTHROPIC DOWN CAN ONLY MEAN ONE THING
English
0
0
1
75
dave
dave@wigglydtrain·
@gregpr07 do you like the nano texture screen?
English
0
0
1
114
Gregor Zunic
Gregor Zunic@gregpr07·
There is something really fun about working at airports
Gregor Zunic tweet media
English
305
122
4.9K
637.8K
Johann Schopplich
Johann Schopplich@jschopplich·
JSON is token‑expensive for LLMs – just like @mattpocockuk frequently mentions. Meet TOON, the Token‑Oriented Object Notation. 💸 40–60% fewer tokens than JSON 📐 readable & tokenizer-aware Wrap your JSON with `encode` to save half the token cost: github.com/johannschoppli…
English
210
346
3.6K
556.8K
dave
dave@wigglydtrain·
@amasad So why’d you raise it?
English
0
0
0
6
Amjad Masad
Amjad Masad@amasad·
Have *not* yet spent a single dollar from the money we raised 2.5 years ago!
English
368
49
3.6K
844.2K
dave
dave@wigglydtrain·
@itsnotbernhard good on you for immediately turning to twitter
English
0
0
0
76
berni
berni@itsnotbernhard·
Just wrapped an interview with a candidate. Palo Alto born & raised, Palo Alto High school, Ivy League CS, internships at tier-1 startups & ai labs. On the call he literally melted down from the pressure. Parents, peers, expectations, he was completely overwhelmed. Palo Alto parents, please love your kids. Please put aside your own ego and just love them.
English
200
67
3.5K
589.8K
dave
dave@wigglydtrain·
@benhylak you got enough apps there
dave tweet media
English
0
0
0
140
ben (is hiring engineers)
ben (is hiring engineers)@benhylak·
no time to post. locked in from a mountain in alaska. talk to you all soon.
ben (is hiring engineers) tweet media
English
20
1
146
11.1K
Jason Freedman
Jason Freedman@jasonfreedman·
The Venture Series A industry will have a pre-Standard Capital and post-Standard Capital split. Exactly the same as the shift in seed funding that occurred when YC introduced the Summer Founders Program in 2006 and the SAFE in 2012. The market will shift over time to those venture firms with a Standard Capital-style application/fast decision process and those without. And those without will increasingly see that they didn't get a shot at a lot of great Series A opportunities like they used to. @daltonc and @paultoo are fabulous people and fabulous investors and will build a great firm and pull in top tier founders. They could have easily built a normal firm and raised this much based on the strength of their track record alone. But instead they chose to upend the whole model. It shows just how much they understand founders. No founders want to spend 3-9 months fundraising. No founders want to participate in fragile lead investor dynamics No founders want to negotiate bespoke Series A docs No founders want to pay for huge legal fees on both side of the transaction. No founders want to default sell 25% of the company No founders wants to default give up board seats. The reality for the moment is that founders will go first to the Series A firm that requires the absolute minimum amount of their efforts so that they can stay focused on their company instead. Currently Standard Capital is really the only firm that can offer that. Every Series A firm should be spending next week discussing whether they are going to adopt the Standard Capital approach. I hope many of them jump on board sooner rather than later.
Dalton Caldwell@daltonc

Paul, Bryan and I are proud to announce the close of Standard Capital's $425M Fund I. Standard Capital is Series A for the best founders. Applications for our inaugural funding cycle are open now.

English
2
5
29
10.3K
dave
dave@wigglydtrain·
@timkawakami do you think purdy throws that game winning touchdown away if he has greater confidence in jake moody?
English
0
0
0
27
Ryan Florence
Ryan Florence@ryanflorence·
pov I find eslint in a typescript project I need to work in
English
26
5
229
51.4K
dave
dave@wigglydtrain·
@JohnPhamous very claire hughes johnson of you
English
0
0
0
110
JohnPhamous
JohnPhamous@JohnPhamous·
a personal readme kinda like llms.txt but for humans
JohnPhamous tweet media
English
13
0
193
18.2K
dave
dave@wigglydtrain·
@nathan_covey because it doesn’t fucking matter
English
0
0
0
2
Nathan Covey
Nathan Covey@nathan_covey·
I'm sorry but if you're using Wix, Squarespace, or Wordpress for your website, how are you in YC??
Nathan Covey tweet media
English
363
38
2K
379.9K
dave
dave@wigglydtrain·
@a_sarentorbic @thdxr knowing a ddd term doesnt automatically make u better lol. plenty of ppl like to say things like “bounded context” and “ubiquitous language” and still write garbage code
English
0
0
0
13
dax
dax@thdxr·
on this topic of structuring code for LLMs the truth is you're likely biasing towards technology you like and coming up with reasons why it's good for LLMs they're decent with most setups so you can find whatever proof you want if you want to really optimize try to shed all your biases - the root thing here is agents benefit from being able to consume a codebase granularly the reason codebases are less granular than they can be is because it's tedious - so most of our tech has traded off an amount of readability for simplifying authorship so the question is what patterns would you try if you weren't concerned about the pain of writing code and the answer are things that are generally unpopular - lots of files, separation of concerns, enterprise-y patterns
English
33
6
196
25.3K
dave
dave@wigglydtrain·
@gregisenberg never, ever give up equity in your company for a few hundred leads
English
0
0
0
6
GREG ISENBERG
GREG ISENBERG@gregisenberg·
Creator seed rounds are about to become a thing. Instead of giving ~15-25% of your company to VCs for ~$3M, you give that same chunk to a creator. For zero dollars. Sounds insane until you think about it. Standard seed round dilution is 15-20%. You need $3M to build and find customers, VCs want their ownership target, everyone knows the dance. But founders are starting to realize something, they don't need $3M to build anymore for software businesses. That's what doesn't keep them up at night Finding customers is what keeps them up. Enter the creator with 500k YouTube subscribers. Those subscribers are your exact target customer in your exact subniche. The creator already has their trust. One authentic mention from them is worth six months of paid ads. So you offer them 20% of your company. Same dilution as a seed round, but instead of cash you can't spend efficiently, you get customers you can monetize immediately. And a firehose of customer feedback (woo!). The YouTuber is stoked because sponsorships pay $30k once. Equity could be worth $30M. They'll talk about this product for years because they're an owner, not a rental. And they are constantly giving you feedback, more valuable than an investor because they are your target, and they want this product to be as valuable as possible to their followers. You can still raise from VCs later. But now you're raising a Series A at $30M with actual revenue, not a seed at $12M with hopes and dreams. The creator got you through the hardest part: proving people want what you're building. Or you just ignore the VC route. With customer acquisition solve, you become instantly profitable. Harder if this is a physical product but if you'e a software company (app, maketplace etc) this is the rule not the exception. Creator seed rounds. New trend. I think this will continue to be more common.
English
223
137
1.7K
324.9K
Sim Gaming Network
Sim Gaming Network@SimGamingNetwrk·
@nut_history The Rockies in the Pacific coast while the Checks notes Dodgers, Angels and padres Who are all actually on the Pacific Coast Are in the West. Smfh
English
9
0
162
20.3K
BaseballHistoryNut
BaseballHistoryNut@nut_history·
Here are Jim Bowden proposed realignment Thoughts?
BaseballHistoryNut tweet mediaBaseballHistoryNut tweet media
English
2.5K
576
11.9K
3.3M
dave
dave@wigglydtrain·
@thdxr if this is true about people making them, it’s probably true about the people using them what’re the main things people are doing wrong when using opencode?
English
0
0
0
76
dax
dax@thdxr·
looking through the source code of some of these coding agents i get the feeling the authors actually hate programming idk how well positioned they are to dictate how programming should be done
English
21
4
268
17.6K
dave
dave@wigglydtrain·
@thdxr it's because it wasn't able to find & replace. i think i'd probably expect it to update the search string instead of replacing my code
dave tweet media
English
0
0
0
12
dave
dave@wigglydtrain·
@thdxr hanged some of the styles on the skeleton, and decided to just change them back.
English
1
0
0
13