wild

?? Over 45 year time frame the cost doubled. Ok what would the cost be using fossil fuel to expand electric power generation instead of renewable. Yes I agree the grid delivery is a major cost. Just using renewables won’t lower an electric bill. But renewables are less expensive to delivery power to the grid. Texas invests more in renewable energy than any state and the utilities are free to optimize profits anyway they please. Texas is independent of the national grid. Bottom line world wide renewables capture 90% of new electric power production. Adding natural gas turbines for significant production has a long lead time. Adding for peaked function to deal with short term duration power has a shorter led time. Wind solar and grid batteries are fast to deploy and lower cost but some new natural gas production is still being built.

Climate has been weaponized to drive a global agenda—orchestrated by the United Nations and backed by a projected $147 trillion in forced structural reinvestment (McKinsey Global, 2022). The physical reality of this shift involves up to 1.3 million wind turbines and eight billion solar panels (so far). They are darkening our most iconic land and seascapes, blighting rural farmlands, and cutting massive corridors through pristine native forests. By definition, climate is simply the study of regional weather patterns over a standard 30-year period. Over time, however, it has transformed into a convenient metaphor for a broader ideological struggle. The underlying reality is that no one can accurately predict a climate crisis decades into the future, when meteorologists struggle with a three-day forecast. Yet, a computer-model 'scenario' has been elevated into the defining crisis of our time. The evidence for this doomsday narrative is threadbare. While global temperatures have risen by roughly 1.4 degrees since the dawn of the Industrial Revolution in 1769 - when the world’s population was just one billion - that modest warming has already occurred, and humanity has thrived alongside it. Even the IPCC has quietly backed away from its extreme five-degree doomsday scenarios. To claim a degree or two represents an existential threat ignores human history; we are an adaptable species that thrives from the equator to the Arctic. Yet this erratic metric now underpins a multi-decade campaign that is actively dismantling Western economies. The consequences are no longer theoretical. The real-world cost is arriving daily—leaving Western society to face its highest electricity prices in history.