Sabitlenmiş Tweet
usdt.sats🦞🦀
1.6K posts
#polymarket
震惊了， 第一次4小时内没有ERROR日志
这意味着我几十个bot在4小时访问polymarket
下单/取消订单/获取库存/获取orderbook/data和gamma api
一次出错都没有， 包括网络出错
🧐难道真的要进步了？
中文
@WorldClawAI is expanding access to AI and $WLFI plays a key role in the ecosystem. Users can access 300+ models with WorldRouter, and agents can facilitate payments in USD1 on @BNBCHAIN and @solana to support task execution.
Locking $WLFI tokens can provide access to additional features and functionality related to the future of AI.
Subject to applicable terms and conditions.
WorldClaw@WorldClawAI
Today, WorldClaw launches WorldRouter with @worldlibertyfi, one simple account to access 300+ AI models with competitive fees*. No more jumping between ChatGPT, Claude and all the others. Same power, way cheaper. This is your first step into the WorldClaw AgentOS. 👉 worldclaw.ai #USD1 #WLFI #AI #AgentOS #WorldClaw #WorldRouter *WorldRouter rates shown are priced approximately 30% below the corresponding model providers' published list rates at the time of publication. See website for more pricing details.
English
不投“YES”就永久锁定
$WLFI 的治理投票跟独裁没什么区别
从发币开始任何阶段做空
到手的收益都会远远大于参加预售
WLFI@worldlibertyfi
Token unlock proposal is now live for vote. ☝️ This is one of the most significant governance proposals in WLFI history. Here's what's at stake.
中文
Today, I filed a lawsuit in California federal court against World Liberty Financial to protect my legal rights as a holder of $WLFI tokens.
I have always been—and remain—an ardent supporter of President Trump and his Administration’s efforts to make America crypto friendly. This lawsuit does not change how I feel about President Trump or the Trump Administration.
Unfortunately, certain individuals on the World Liberty project team have been operating the project in a manner that goes against President Trump’s values. They wrongfully froze all of my tokens, stripped me of my right to vote on governance proposals, and have threatened to permanently destroy my tokens by “burning” them—all without any proper justification. I do not believe President Trump would condone these actions if he knew about them.
I have tried in good faith to resolve this situation with the World Liberty project team without resorting to litigation. But the project team has refused my requests to unfreeze my tokens and restore my rights as a token holder. They have left me with no choice but to turn to the courts.
All I want is to be treated the same as every other early investor who received tokens—no better, no worse.
I also want the community to know that I strongly oppose the new governance proposal World Liberty published on April 15.
If it passes, token holders who do not “affirmatively accept” its terms—including a requirement that 10% of all advisor tokens be permanently burned—will have their tokens locked indefinitely.
For early purchaser tokens, the proposal imposes a two-year cliff followed by a two-year vesting schedule—and again, for those who do not affirmatively accept, their tokens are locked indefinitely.
This proposal is bad for the community, but because World Liberty has frozen my early investor tokens, I cannot vote them for or against the proposal.
I believe in fairness, transparency, and the principles that make crypto powerful. I will continue to fight for those principles. 🙏
English
The team has made a decision aligned with long-term investors: 80% of the initial tokens will remain locked for the next two years, and will then be released gradually on a linear basis.
To me, this reflects a strong commitment to the long-term sustainability of $WLFI. The focus is clear: manage supply, build value, and execute.
Patience and long-term vision will make the difference. Growth will come.
English
骗子对总统和我都进行远洋捕捞，而且性质非常恶劣！
Captain Kent | 肯特船长🪶@captain_kent
🧐孙宇晨维权 WLFI 事件的三大疑点 孙宇晨和川普这俩人，我一直持中性态度。他俩都为行业做过贡献，也都在给自己捞好处。说不上好坏，但都是挺通透的人。 但这次 WLFI 事件确实非常耐人寻味，让船长这个身经百战的司法老手都惊呆了，捕捉到了一点不一样的气息。没错，一股子美国版的「远洋捕捞」的味道。 船长扒了扒链上数据和双方表态，感觉孙哥这回是真的哑巴吃黄连了，有众多不可思议的疑点。来来来，凳子瓜子，待老子细嗦！ - ▌疑点一：为何黑名单功能上线时间卡那么准？ 知名分析师 @banteg 在GitHub上的公开：2024年9月的V1合约确实没黑名单，2025年8月升级V2就悄悄加上了。控制冻结权限的是一个单一EOA地址，这地址同时是3/5多签成员，还单独控制着一个阈值=1的Safe钱包。 翻译成人话就是，一个人点头，你账户里的钱就动不了了。 X原文：x.com/banteg/status/… GitHub: gist.github.com/banteg/8ca7c13… 孙哥说这是「后门」，我得添把醋，这不仅是后门，还是专门留给你的后门。 我们来看看时间节点。 2025年8月24日升级的 V2，添加了黑名单权限，结果9月4日就给孙哥的钱包地址给冻结了。 前后相差仅仅10天，这不明摆着这把刀子只架你一人的脖子！ 然后，WLFI 从头到尾没正面解释那个 EOA 是谁控制的，就丢一句「毫无根据」打发人。根本不敢公开审计报告和多签成员身份。为什么不敢？当然不敢。 - ▌疑点二：为什么无法解释冻结具体原因？ 我之前说 CZ 是被美国司法部门用华人方式来了场「远洋捕捞」。好了，这回轮到孙哥了。 孙宇晨被冻结了价值上亿美元的代币。WLFI 说是「高风险的恶意活动」。然后它并没有说恶意活动的标准是什么？以及有什么证据？还有申诉通道在哪？ WLFI 这次冻结，船长个人感觉完全是冲着你的钱来的，它不看你行为风险有多高，而看你个人钞票有多少。CZ 在《币安人生》里也有同样的自述与感悟。然后冻完连个申诉的门都没，这是要冻上几百年？ 还有荒谬的一点，WLFI 把孙宇晨一个人塞进「Category 3」投资人类别，其余519名早期投资者全在「Category 1」。然后说他提前解锁20%转移代币是「不当行为」。 这一点我是非常非常好奇，合同里写清楚这个类别的特殊性了吗？如果没写，现在项目方又随意解释规则，今天说你提币不当，明天是不是就能说你呼吸方式不对？ 怎么看，都感觉这是一场精准狩猎啊！ - ▌疑点三：川普家族火速切割释放什么信号？ 最有意思的来了。 几个月前，WLFI 官网上还挂着川普一家子的照片，创始人、联合创始人，头衔一个比一个响亮。现在全没了，只剩一句「川普实体不担任运营角色」。 这不是此地无银三百两吗？ 股权还在，分红还在，早期推广视频还在呢。这一看舆论不对，立马从「运营」里摘出来。 更讽刺的是，移除页面的时间点恰好是孙宇晨开撕、流动性争议爆发的时候。这不是常规网站改版，这是危机公关式切割。 WLFI 当初最大的卖点就是「川家背书」。现在这个卖点没了，币价断崖式下跌，其他投资者和社区怎么办？做孙哥的陪葬品？那些冲着川普名头来的人，回头一看，项目方连自己的创始人都能下架，那还有什么不能下架的？ - ▌总结：感觉像是为大户投资者攒的局 我不评价孙宇晨这个人。但就事论事，这次 WLFI 给我的感觉，就是冲大户投资者攒的局。高位入场的散户面临巨亏不说，最大原始投资人的筹码直接给扣住不给了。 数据摆在那，首次私募时，孙宇晨3000万美元占了当时总募资的57%，最后以7500万美元的总投资额，占了13.6%。 孙宇晨投 WLFI，很好理解，也想在美国找个政治靠山。CZ 不也甘愿自首吗？都是想在美国站稳脚跟的险棋。有什么办法？钱这么多，中国有禁令，迪拜太乱，美国是绕不开的首选归宿。 就冲这一点，CZ 和孙宇晨先后被「远洋捕捞」式地榨取巨额财富，而他们对这套流氓把戏一点办法都没有。CZ 在回忆录中满满都是无力感。 目前 WLFI 的回应在我看来全是空话。真有理有据，早把审计报告、控制人身份、冻结触发条件贴出来了。拖着不公开，只有一个解释：公开了更难看。 最后船长只想说：如果你连孙宇晨这样的大户都能随意冻结，那普通用户在这项目里，是否连被收割的资格都没有，或许只是用来收割大户的陪跑炮灰？
中文
这是"世界暴政", 不是"世界自由金融"
此提案被包装成"治理对齐信号"和"长期承诺"，但剥开包装来看，这是我见过的最荒谬的治理骗局之一。我逐条说明。
一、反对即受罚——经典的胁迫手段
这不是一次合法的投票，而是胁迫，这个提案的设计本身就是一个逻辑陷阱：任何投反对票的人，其代币将被无限期锁定，没有任何解锁路径。
换句话说，你反对这个提案，你就被惩罚。这不叫投票，这叫胁迫。世界上哪有一种民主程序是同意就给你好处、反对就关你禁闭的？
二、投票者已被选择性冻结
我个人持有约4%的投票权，但我的代币已被冻结，我被强制排除在投票过程之外。
我并非个例。
大量持有重大投票权的持有人都处于同样的状态。与此同时，团队掌握着冻结代币的权力——他们决定谁能投票、谁不能投票。这意味着什么？意味着在投票开始之前，结果就已经被决定了。
这不是治理投票。这是一场警察已经封锁了议会大门、只放自己人进去举手的表演。投票池已经被清洗过了，剩下的只有同意票。
这种投票的结果没有任何约束力。
三、全部实际权力被匿名者窃取
WLFI智能合约的实际控制权掌握在一个3/5匿名多签手中，而一个匿名的guardian EOA则拥有将持有WLFI的地址列入黑名单的权力。
请注意——是匿名的。
这个匿名多签可以无视任何投票结果，直接在合约层面执行任何操作。所谓的治理提案、链上投票、社区讨论，统统不过是一场戏。真正的权力从未被交给任何其他人，而他们试图用这些把戏来愚弄社区，简直可笑。
事实是：权力掌握在没有人知道、也无法验证其所有者身份的匿名钱包地址手中。这不是去中心化治理，这是披着DAO外衣的独裁。
四、投票者必须实名，统治者却匿名——比暴政还过分
最讽刺的部分在于：WLFI要求每一个参与投票的持有人完成身份验证、电子签署确认、满足合规资格要求。你想行使自己的权利？请先亮出身份。
但真正掌握合约生杀大权的guardian和多签签名者是谁？没有人被告知，完全没有透明度。被统治者必须实名，而拥有绝对权力的统治者却是匿名的。你的选民要登记造册、接受审查、被审核资格、被指示如何投票——而你的独裁者连脸都不露。
五、数十亿美元财产权利的赤裸侵犯
让我们不要忘记这个提案的真实利害：这不是一个无关痛痒的参数调整或协议升级。这个投票要决定的是高达数十亿美元资产的解锁时间表、治理与归属权的重新分配，以及最极端的——数十亿枚代币的永久销毁。这是对持有人财产权利赤裸裸的剥夺。
在一个投反对票就被惩罚、大量持有人被冻结投票权、实际控制权在匿名钱包手中的环境下，用这样一场伪投票来决定数十亿美元资产的命运？
这不是治理，这是一场骗局，完全背离了这个协议的初衷。任何法治社会都不会允许这种事情发生。在传统金融市场中，任何涉及这种规模的资产处置，都需要经过严格的监管审查、独立董事会批准和少数股东保护程序。
而在这里，几个匿名钱包就可以决定一切。代币的永久销毁意味着持有人的财产被不可逆地消灭——没有赔偿，没有追索权，没有任何正当程序。这已经远远超出了所谓"去中心化治理"的范畴，这是对财产权的系统性侵犯。
结论
我重申，这个提案是非法治理。这是少数被筛选出来的人在行使权力，精心策划一场进一步的权力巩固和财产掠夺行动。
反对者因投反对票而受罚，异见者被冻结，实际控制权在匿名钱包手中，行使权利的人必须自证身份，而数十亿美元资产的命运就这样被一场伪投票裁决。
这不是去中心化金融应有的样子。在这种条件下产生的结果不具备合法性，不应具有约束力，不应被承认。
我呼吁所有WLFI持有人认清这个提案的本质，在所有公开渠道表达反对，并保留一切法律追诉权利。
WLFI@worldlibertyfi
We’ve just posted a governance proposal to the forum for community discussion, and we believe it represents one of the strongest long-term governance alignment signals in DeFi. Here's what it does 🧵
中文
@zakfolkman What kind of brain and genes led you to come up with such a bizarre solution? I suspect there's a developmental defect in you.
English
Already seeing strong support on the latest governance proposal. Check it out now 🦅 ☝️
WLFI@worldlibertyfi
We’ve just posted a governance proposal to the forum for community discussion, and we believe it represents one of the strongest long-term governance alignment signals in DeFi. Here's what it does 🧵
English
I am calling on World Liberty Financial @worldlibertyfi to publicly disclose who controls the single guardian EOA and the 3/5 multisig that govern the WLFI smart contract.
Every investor has the right to know who holds the power to freeze their assets.
Here is what on-chain records show: A single guardian EOA — which also sits on the multisig — blacklisted my wallet. That same address is the sole owner of a second guardian Safe with a threshold of 1.
This means one person — one single individual — has the unilateral power to freeze any token holder's assets. Seizing those assets requires a 3-of-5 multisig vote, but freezing requires only one signature.
Who is that person? The community deserves an answer.
Let me be clear about what this structure means: community governance and voting are meaningless. Every proposal, every vote, every claim of decentralized decision-making is theater. Real power — the power to freeze, to move funds, to control the protocol — sits with one anonymous EOA and a 3-of-5 multisig that answers to no one. The entire governance framework has been hollowed out from the inside.
A project that claims to stand for decentralization and financial freedom cannot concentrate this level of power in a single anonymous address. If the WLFI team has nothing to hide, they should have no difficulty identifying who controls these keys.
banteg@banteg
justin sun vs wlfi the original token deployed sep 2024 had no blacklist and no seizure, but it was upgradable. the blacklist was added in v2 on aug 24, 2025. 11 months after sun invested and one week before trading opened. on nov 19, 2025, another upgrade added batch reallocation, essentially seizing, justified with saving phished funds. whatever the paper contract said, the code for vesting contract supports cliff dates, linear schedules, and up to 8 segments per category. wlfi used none of these to restrict sun. they chose 20% instant lump-sum unlock, then punished him for using a fraction of it. the remaining 80% has no vesting schedule at all, 7+ months later, claimable() returns 0. the vesting contract has per-category schedules to enforce token lockups. what's interesting is wlfi has carved out a special category 3 specifically for justin sun, he's the only user in it. the other 519 investors are in category 1. 14 minutes before sun activated his wallet, wlfi's own 3-of-5 multisig configured category 3 to release 20% of his 3b allocation as freely transferable tokens at trading start. over the next 3 days sun transferred out 55m. a single guardian eoa (also on multisig) blacklisted him. that address is also the sole owner of a second guardian safe with threshold 1. so one person can freeze anyone, while seizing requires 3-of-5. meanwhile, the same multisig is using 5b wlfi as collateral on dolomite to borrow $250m in stablecoins. they represent 98% of all wlfi on dolomite and 86% of the protocol's entire borrow volume. two safes with the same five signers, running a usd1/usdc loop that recycles borrowed usd1 as collateral to borrow usdc and feed it back.
English
This very morning, I reached out to a member of the $WLFI team to express my concerns about the community.
Within a matter of hours, they published this tweet, showing they are actively listening and truly value those who are part of the project.
It may not be obvious to everyone right now, but over time, it will make sense.
Trust the process. Trust $WLFI. #USD1
WLFI@worldlibertyfi
Let's talk about the FUD going around our WLFI Markets lending position. It's wrong. Here's what's actually happening — and why the real story is a lot more interesting.
English
To clarify: this is not a proposal to unlock all tokens at once.
The vote will be on a long-term vesting and unlock schedule for retail early purchasers — a structured, phased approach designed with the long-term health of the ecosystem in mind.
WLFI@worldlibertyfi
For early token holders: A governance proposal to unlock locked tokens will be posted to the forum next week for community input — and will go to a formal vote shortly after. This is the project showing up for the people who showed up first.
English
