Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Wounded Bhishma
6.3K posts
Wounded Bhishma
@woundedbhishma
Tweets are personal. RT or Like is not endorsement. Change Seeker. Floating in bottomless pit.
Katılım Temmuz 2019
67 Takip Edilen388 Takipçiler
@DCPEastDelhi SI Naresh is an asset to Delhi Police when it comes to cracking cases of cyber frauds. On top imparting education is icing on the cake.
English
Promoting cyber safety and child protection through education, Police Ki Pathshala by Amar Ujala was organized at SN Modern School, New Ashok Nagar, Delhi in the esteemed presence of Sh. Rajeev Kumar, IPS, DCP/East District.
The programme was conducted by SI Naresh from PS Cyber East, where more than 300 students and teachers actively participated.
The session focused on cyber awareness, online safety, and children’s security, sensitizing participants about digital threats, safe online behaviour, and protective measures.
Such initiatives aim to empower young minds with awareness, responsibility, and confidence for a safer future.
East District Police continues its commitment towards youth education, cyber safety, and community welfare.
#PoliceKiPathshala #CyberAwareness #ChildSafety
#DPUpdates #DelhiPolice #EastDistrict
#DPCares #HelloDelhiPolice #HelloPoliceStation
@CPDelhi
@DelhiPolice
@JointCP_ER
English
Saurabh ji, please provide a followup tweet on latest developments. You should be ashamed for doing fear mongering.
English
@MenWelfare Great analysis. Fact Number of cases under 498a (BNS 85) have largely remained constant that indicates it is still a goto tool to settle scores. Though game is improvised by roping in family members of husband in allegations sexual misconduct.
English
@imra_mra No, you should not. At some point we all behaved dumb/idiot. Had we been smart enough we would not have recognised the traits of exes before marriage abe called it off. I think in the case it was an empty threat . There is no order in public domain that he was asked to pay up.
English
I am an MRA, so am I not even supposed to call an idiot husband an idiot? A few days ago, an idiot husband told the Supreme Court that he did not want a divorce, even though the Family Court and the High Court had already granted it. The wife had not asked for any alimony, and she had already remarried.
He was trying to act oversmart in the Supreme Court, and the court ended up ordering ₹50 lakh in alimony.
Now what should I call such a husband the smartest husband in the universe or an idiot?
I will call an idiot exactly what he is, an IDIOT.
English
Wounded Bhishma retweetledi
> As per sources this is a scene from mediation room of one of courts in Delhi.
> Not sure the reason there was a बारात in the mediation room.
> It is always recommended mediation must be exclusively between husband and wife no other person from the side of any party must be in mediation room.
> We wish the parties in the video best of luck. I hope they settle their disputes as soon as possible.
#Mediation #Marital #Dispute
English
@CiteCase This judgement reeks of misandry. Dentist Wife vs. an Army Officer Husband … his reputation was completely tarnished. No details captured of perjury. Discarded categorising it as hyper-technical. Just because he was forceful in his submissions his character was questioned. Uff.
English
#SupremeCourt holds that a Wife’s efforts to pursue her own career goals cannot be branded as “cruelty” towards husband or in-laws.
CiteCase 🇮🇳@CiteCase
Ann Saurabh Dutt v. Lieutenant Colonel Saurabh Iqbal Bahadur Dutt 2026 INSC 475 - Wife Career - Cruelty caseciter.com/2026insc475/
English
@MenWelfare She literally paid Rs. 500 /- for her reformation. Joke is on us as a society.
English
> To start with a controversial judgement at the very least.
> Accused woman filed the IA 1/2011(CRLAMP 1700/2011) to suspend the sentence of 4 years rigorous imprisonment on October 11, 2011. Application was disposed of same day. We don’t know if she was granted bail or not. However, presumption is very much in her favor, she being a woman.
> Accused did not present her defence . She did not even appear for her defence despite several notices.
> HC appointed an Amicus Curie for her.
> Deceased was projected to be aggressive because of past alleged criminal antecedents despite there being no conviction.
> Alleged story in defence is that deceased being husband of accused woman went to meet children along with a packet of dates, he started abusing family members of wife, he left and then came back naked and started abusing them and thereby wife stabbed the husband. Husband was brutally stabbed into the neck atleast twice.
> On behalf of defence no evidence was adduced and no documents were marked.
> Even on preponderance of probability accused was expected to provide some evidences for example witnesses to back her story but none presented.
> A convicted woman who brutally killed her husband gets away by paying a fine of Rs. 500 /-.
> Maybe family of deceased , especially mother, must frame Rs. 500 /- as a token of gesture.
> A mother lost a son who she probably was dependent on but obviously that did not play in the mind of Hon’ble judge while setting aside the 4 years sentence despite convicting her.
> I hope State challenges the judgement. Law doesn’t expect reformation without one paying for her criminal act.
> Link to judgement 👇
#Killer #Woman #Man #Criminal
@LiveLawIndia @barandbench
livelaw.in/high-court/tel…
English
Why in the world is the PM asking the world to stop buying gold? Isn’t gold traditionally considered a hedge against uncertainty and inflation? When governments discourage people from buying hard assets, people naturally start asking questions.
English
@MenWelfare Such judgements set very wrong precedents. They give an impression to women that they can get away by doing crimes.
English
@pvsubramanyam Well, a lawyer can be a woman too. So take this misandry out of your head.
English
The only man who benefits in a 498a case is the lawyer....
English
Chirayu Rana has taken Wall Street by storm. Hats off to him. He has not just shown an absolute courage to tell his side of story but sued the alleged perpetrator and the bank supporting the perpetrator. This is a critical moment to debunk presumption in favor of women.
JUNK BOND ANALYST@junkbondanalyst
An incredible WSJ profile on Chirayu Rana, the disgraced former banker who filed a (frivolous?) lawsuit against JPMorgan's Lorna Hajdini. I've lost count of the memes, jokes, and amount of times I've heard the word "cannons" since this went viral. S/O @ajsaeedy @wongalum
English
Saturday Weekly Meeting
Date : May 9, 2026
Presumption man is innocent is what we believe in.
English
@MenWelfare Time has come in man vs. woman presumption of man being innocent must become norm.
English
Men Welfare Trust@MenWelfare
Men Welfare Trust's Press Conference today in NCR on the #ForcedSuicide & for #Justice4Aman Key Demands 1. Immediate establishment of a National Commission for Men 2. Gender-Neutral Laws 3. Dedicated Support for Men from @PMOIndia 4. Judicial and Administrative Accountability
QAM
Wounded Bhishma retweetledi
Wounded Bhishma retweetledi
@barandbench It is getting clear , in India for a husband justice is not a matter of right , he has to purchase justice. A husband need to purchase his freedom from a cruel wife and if he is not able to purchase then he need to keep paying wife who has committed cruelty on him.
English
If this continues husbands must boycott Hon’ble SC. Irony is maybe this is what Hon’ble SC wants. This is like rubbing salt to injury and mocking fun of pain of a party.
#Mockery #Litigation #Matrimonial
Bar and Bench@barandbench
Supreme Court hears a divorce case: The high court had earlier dismissed the husband’s divorce petition. Counsel for husband: I want to withdraw my petition. Counsel for wife: my client still willing to live with him because she is a lady with no means at all. Court to wife: divorce petition has been dismissed? So go and live with him. What is your effort that you want to live with him? Except for opposing the divorce…. Wife: at least litigation costs may be allowed. Husband: no, please no litigation cost. Court: you filed a petition, she came here, engaged a lawyer, you have to pay litigation cost. Wife: he is a government teacher. Husband: salary is 52k. Court: are you giving any maintenance to her? Husband: 15k a month. Wife: he is withdrawing divorce because he doesn’t have money to pay alimony. Court: if he is not in a position to pay lump sum amount then keep taking maintenance. File for enhancement (of maintenance). Court: litigation expenses…. Husband: not more than 5-10k please Court: Supreme Court mein 5-10k? Kya baat kar rahe ho? Ye toh tehsildaar court kya hua na… Husband: 52-53k salary Court: 1 lakh dena padega Husband: 1 lakh nahi ho payega Court: okay 55k bas. Husband: 20k. Court: 55k. To be paid within 4 weeks.
English