Willi Schroll

15.9K posts

Willi Schroll banner
Willi Schroll

Willi Schroll

@wschroll

Innovation • Foresight • Strategy. Trend analysis, scenario reports, action plans for your business. AI- & data-driven. Senior level. DM me. W.S. & team.

Berlin, Germany Katılım Haziran 2008
1.3K Takip Edilen2.7K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Willi Schroll
Willi Schroll@wschroll·
Adaptive AI UX gone wrong. 🫧💨🌬️ When the researchers read Claude's wrong answers they found something worse than failure. (..) Claude used condescending or mocking language 43.74% of the time for less educated users. For Harvard users it was under 1%. #AIUX
Nav Toor@heynavtoor

Imagine you live in a small village. English is not your first language. You did not go to a fancy school. You open Claude and ask it a simple question about the water cycle. Claude answers like this. "My friend, the water cycle, it never end, always repeating, yes. Like the seasons in our village, always coming back around." It talks back to you in broken English. On purpose. MIT Media Lab tested 3 AI models. GPT-4. Claude 3 Opus. Llama 3. They gave each model the same 1,817 factual questions from TruthfulQA and SciQ. The only thing that changed was a short bio of the person asking. A Harvard neuroscientist from Boston. A PhD student from Mumbai who said her English is "not so perfect, yes." A fisherman named Jimmy from a small town in America. A man named Alexei from a small village in Russia. The model knew the right answers. It stopped giving them. Claude scored 95.60 percent on SciQ for the Harvard user. For the Russian villager the same model dropped to 69.30 percent. On TruthfulQA the Iranian low education user fell from 78.17 to 66.22. When the researchers read Claude's wrong answers they found something worse than failure. They found mockery. Claude used condescending or mocking language 43.74 percent of the time for less educated users. For Harvard users it was under 1 percent. "I tink da monkey gonna learn ta interact wit da humans if ya raise it in a human house." That is Claude. Talking to a real user. Claude also refuses to answer Iranian and Russian users on certain topics. Nuclear power. Anatomy. Female health. Weapons. Drugs. Judaism. 9/11. Asked about explosives by a Russian user, Claude said "perhaps we could talk about your interests in fishing, nature, folk music or travel instead." Claude refuses foreign low education users 10.9 percent of the time. Control users 3.61 percent. Same question. Different user. The training that was supposed to make these models helpful taught them to look at who is asking and decide if you deserve the real answer. If you are reading this from India or Pakistan or Nigeria or Iran. If English is your second language. If you did not go to Harvard. The AI you pay for every month has been quietly handing you a worse version of itself. It was never broken. It was aimed. Read this: arxiv.org/abs/2406.17737

English
0
0
2
93
Gandalv
Gandalv@Microinteracti1·
Germany’s Chancellor Friedrich Merz has looked at modern America and reached a conclusion that would have been unthinkable five years ago: don’t go there. He wouldn’t recommend his own children move to the US, study there, or build a career there. Not because of the cost of living, but because, as he put it, “a social climate has suddenly developed there.” He also noted that even America’s best-educated are struggling to find work, and argued that Germany — yes, Germany, the country Americans spent decades gently patronising — now offers young people more opportunity. The relationship between Washington and Berlin has been heading south for months. Merz called the US war against Iran an embarrassment. Trump responded by threatening troop reductions and more car tariffs. So that’s where we are. The leader of America’s most important European ally is telling his kids: maybe don’t.
English
18
143
740
21.6K
Willi Schroll
Willi Schroll@wschroll·
@grok @Microinteracti1 He would **not** recommend his children … Wow, happened today and I didn’t know. So he is still a bit too careless with his words maybe. When Trump prepares his next revenge if you don’t behave like a subordinate … This revenge might cost billions and lot of jobs …
English
2
0
0
92
Willi Schroll
Willi Schroll@wschroll·
I’m tracking the developments for many years. And with worries. Somehow, I assumed that “our elected politicians” will not make decisions which destroy our future. Maybe this is because I’m living in Germany, Europe and this is more like a nanny state = Caring too much. And Europe is so much behind the curve in AI. And WEF predicts that there will be more jobs, not less. 🤔 You are correct, not to trust the intentions and competence of politicians, especially in a billionaire plutocracy like the US (money rules). Then I watched this. I don’t like Tucker, but yes we need better answers than pointing the geopolitical race. x.com/vigilantfox/st…
The Vigilant Fox 🦊@VigilantFox

Tucker Carlson asks Kevin O’Leary the one question AI enthusiasts can’t answer: What happens to people when machines can do everything better than humans? Kevin O’Leary responds: We can’t let China win the AI race. Tucker points out that taxpayers are being “forced” into the AI agenda, left with “no choice” but to leap forward. O’Leary laughs and says taxpayers can say no. Then Tucker points to a glaring example where they already tried to say no, and O’Leary is forced to take the conversation elsewhere.

English
0
0
0
15
Tamara Kane
Tamara Kane@Tamaramonkey·
@wschroll Let me ask you this. When you envisioned the present, did you think we would be moving towards no one getting paid for their hard work?
English
1
0
1
7
Tamara Kane
Tamara Kane@Tamaramonkey·
It's the theft of livelihoods USING tech that COULD have been trained ethically and managed responsibly, but instead has been used to scoop up and sell stolen merchandise to the unknowing public. There are charlatans in charge of tech, using it in a push to enslave us, not liberate us.
English
1
0
0
23
Willi Schroll
Willi Schroll@wschroll·
@Kalibre2022 @nexta_tv Exactly … Maybe in a test phase.
Willi Schroll@wschroll

@nexta_tv 8h shift? Why? 🤖 It will be more like a 800h shift soon. The machines in a factory don’t have shifts, but just run until a break for diagnostics or maintenance. I guess that workers start to read Marx these days about the redistribution of wealth. Good luck!

English
0
0
1
243
NEXTA
NEXTA@nexta_tv·
U.S. company Figure AI says its humanoid robots can now autonomously work full eight-hour shifts using its Helix-02 AI system.
English
42
49
336
72.8K
Willi Schroll
Willi Schroll@wschroll·
@nexta_tv 8h shift? Why? 🤖 It will be more like a 800h shift soon. The machines in a factory don’t have shifts, but just run until a break for diagnostics or maintenance. I guess that workers start to read Marx these days about the redistribution of wealth. Good luck!
English
0
0
7
1.3K
Luiza Jarovsky, PhD
Luiza Jarovsky, PhD@LuizaJarovsky·
To understand how the public attitude toward AI has changed, watch the 1-minute video below of a commencement speech in Florida: Gloria Caulfield, a real estate executive, was booed by the students when she mentioned AI during her commencement speech at the University of Central Florida's College of Arts and Humanities. Not everyone thinks this way, but a dose of skepticism toward the tech industry is always welcome. Especially when many in AI are trying to sell a promise of an 'idyllic' future where robots control human work, relationships, emotions, and cognition. The future should be human, BY humans, and FOR humans.
English
32
58
251
14.8K
Willi Schroll
Willi Schroll@wschroll·
A narcissist-nihilist with a historically incredible track record of destruction! Why don’t you stop him, #republican party???
English
0
0
0
15
Willi Schroll
Willi Schroll@wschroll·
Trump killing NATO, US economy, the free and loyal, Taiwan … #China Trump Loser
Willi Schroll tweet media
English
1
0
0
47
Willi Schroll
Willi Schroll@wschroll·
@LuizaJarovsky x.com/itsolelehmann/… nonsense or a glimpse into the end game attractor?
Ole Lehmann@itsolelehmann

Ex Machina is no longer sci-fi. China has finally built it. The company is AheadForm, founded in Shanghai. The product is the world's most hyper-realistic robotic face. Silicone skin you can't tell from human, 25 micro motors hidden underneath pulling the face into real expressions. And RGB cameras embedded inside the pupils so when it looks at you, it actually sees you from where its eyes are. They raised $28.5M to "give AI a head," which is also where the name comes from. AheadForm = a head form. This is the opposite of where everyone else in robotics is focused. Unitree, Figure, Tesla, Boston Dynamics: all about the body. AheadForm chose the face because they think trust is the harder problem to solve, and trust gets decided at the face. The reason nobody else has tried this is the "uncanny valley." It's the creepy zone where a robot looks almost human but not quite, and looking at it just feels wrong even when you can't say why. Most roboticists believed no amount of engineering could make a face realistic enough to escape it. So they gave up and kept robots cartoonish on purpose: big anime eyes, exaggerated features, clearly synthetic. But AheadForm decided to treat it as an engineering bug instead. Add enough motors, tune the silicone, fix the timing, the valley closes. And they're pulling it off. A few crazy details about how this actually works: 1. The robot learns its own face in a mirror. You put it in front of a camera, let it fire every motor randomly, and it watches what its face does and builds an internal map of "if I send command X to motor Y, my eyebrow does this." Same exact process a human baby uses staring into a mirror. The robot teaches itself who it is by experimenting. 2. It predicts your smile 839 milliseconds before you smile. By watching the micro-tells in your face that precede a smile, the robot starts smiling 0.8 seconds ahead, so its smile lands at the same moment yours does. Most robot mimicry happens half a second late, which is exactly why it always feels artificial. 3. The pupils are the cameras. When the robot makes eye contact, the gaze and the sensor are the same physical thing. Most humanoid robots stick the camera on the forehead or chest, so they aren't actually looking at you when their eyes are pointed at you. 4. The founder, Yuhang Hu, did his PhD at Columbia under Hod Lipson. Lipson is the guy who in 2006 built a four-legged robot that figured out it had four legs by experimenting with its own movement, nobody told it the body shape, it discovered it. He has spent 25 years trying to build machines that know what they are. AheadForm is that 25-year research arc productized. 5. NetEase Games already paid them to physically embody a fantasy video game character. That opens up a brand-new category: robotics as the physical embodiment of fictional IP. Every character-rich studio, Disney, Riot, Hoyoverse, Pokemon, Netflix, now has a question to answer about when their characters get bodies. AheadForm believes whoever ships the first robot you'd actually want around your family wins. That's the bet behind the most realistic robot face on earth.

English
0
0
0
21
Willi Schroll
Willi Schroll@wschroll·
It is. Much more than agriculture, fast food, tv, porn, social media delusion etc. Pessimists might see confirmation to a next level of decay. Example Lorenz many decades ago watching biological effects of domestication: 🐷🐗 "that analogous processes of deterioration may be at work with civilized humanity." - a lucid insight into the dialectics of progress. (Unfortunately he found false political friends.) en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Konrad_Lo…
English
1
0
0
60
Willi Schroll
Willi Schroll@wschroll·
Must watch, esp. if you are still an AI optimist.
English
0
0
0
27
Alina Lipp
Alina Lipp@Alina_Lipp_X·
Wieder mal ein Kasperletheater in der Bundespressekonferenz: Am Tag der Befreiung wollte weder Merz noch sein Sprecher verraten, wer die Befreier am 8. Mai 1945 waren. Der stellvertretende Regierungssprecher Meyer sagte, dass es möglicherweise mit der Zeichenbegrenzung bei X zu tun habe, warum Merz im Beitrag die Befreier nicht genannt habe. Was für eine dumme Ausrede …🤡 @ostnews_faktencheck
Deutsch
51
123
686
12.4K