Llednar

“Incredibly unprofessional” is subjective. From my view, she: • answered when allowed to answer • pushed back on loaded or argumentative framing • didn’t concede to assumptions built into the questions • stayed on message Hearings aren’t exams where you just recite facts. They’re adversarial and political. If a member interrupts, talks over, or frames a question with a premise she disputes, she’s not obligated to validate that premise just to look “polite.” As for the Dow Jones comment — emphasizing economic performance is a policy argument, not a disqualifier for competence. You may not like her tone or strategy. That’s fair. But disagreeing with style isn’t the same thing as proving incompetence.

No kings. Yet somehow Kamala Harris became the democrat nominee without a single vote.

BREAKING: 🇺🇸 🇮🇷 🇮🇱 Someone made ~$1,000,000 betting on US & Israeli strikes for the last TWO YEARS with near-perfect accuracy using 7 connected Polymarket accounts 🧵

one time this team was raising so i hopped on a call with them, it was a prediction market bot when pitching they mentioned how they receive inside info on gaza bombings from their IDF friends and use the bot to execute those trades they said this with a huge smile on their face. mind you this was the first time i ever spoke to them really fucking shameless and weird i know they will see this too lol