Exahash
496 posts


The "AI job loss" narratives are all fake. AI = massive ramp in productivity = massive ramp in demand = massive jobs boom. Watch.
Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸@pmarca
1. Employer recovery from post-COVID hiring correction 2. Employer recovery from post-COVID interest rate spike 3. Elasticity = demand boom QED
English

@bepsays @om_patel5 50% savings, but I guess that’s why you’re vibe coding 😉
English

@om_patel5 I found that saying hello in my own language, Norwegian ("hei"), only costs me 1%. 100% savings!
English

saying "hello" to Claude on the Pro plan now costs 2% of your entire session usage
one message. "hello, how are you?" that's it.
this is why people are mass migrating to Codex right now because its literally impossible to reach limits
anthropic needs to fix this before they lose the crazy amount of developers they just gained
English

@FinanceLancelot The days of Twitter being the soapbox of the Internet are over.
I’m rarely bothering to contribute to the public discourse anymore.
English
Exahash retweetledi

The Terence Tao episode.
We begin with the absolutely ingenious and surprising way in which Kepler discovered the laws of planetary motion.
People sometimes say that AI will make especially fast progress at scientific discovery because of tight verification loops.
But the story of how we discovered the shape of our solar system shows how the verification loop for correct ideas can be decades (or even millennia) long.
During this time, what we know today as the better theory can often actually make worse predictions (Copernicus's model of circular orbits around the sun was actually less accurate than Ptolemy's geocentric model).
And the reasons it survives this epistemic hell is some mixture of judgment and heuristics that we don’t even understand well enough to actually articulate, much less codify into an RL loop.
Hope you enjoy!
0:00:00 – Kepler was a high temperature LLM
0:11:44 – How would we know if there’s a new unifying concept within heaps of AI slop?
0:26:10 – The deductive overhang
0:30:31 – Selection bias in reported AI discoveries
0:46:43 – AI makes papers richer and broader, but not deeper
0:53:00 – If AI solves a problem, can humans get understanding out of it?
0:59:20 – We need a semi-formal language for the way that scientists actually talk to each other
1:09:48 – How Terry uses his time
1:17:05 – Human-AI hybrids will dominate math for a lot longer
Look up Dwarkesh Podcast on YouTube, Apple Podcasts, or Spotify.
English


Kudos to Stani for saying some of the quiet parts out loud - DAOs are really really hard structures to build within, especially in a fast paced industry like crypto.
Have so many thoughts on this, having been both in-DAO and post-DAO.
Hope AAVE finds their momentum again.
Stani@StaniKulechov
English

@0xLamps @LayerZero_Core You’re an exceptional individual. I can’t wait to see what comes next.
Please stay in touch.
English

Last week I wrapped up my time with the wonderful @LayerZero_Core team.
I have spent the last 3 years working tirelessly with the smartest people I’ve ever met, building something I am truly passionate about. I am incredibly proud of everything we did for Stargate, and LayerZero more recently.
Ultimately being an intimate part of ~80 chain launches over the last couple years has taken a toll on me & it’s time to touch grass for a bit.
The bridge is home & Stargate is left in the safest of hands, LayerZero will continue dominating interop, and Zero will blow your minds. To be very explicit - LZ, and Zero, will win and my belief in the technology and the team is at an all time high.
Through it all, I could not be more grateful for the opportunity and learnings. A true honour.
Ad Astra.
English
Exahash retweetledi

@patrickjwitt Jamie and everyone that parrots this idiotic talking point wagering that the public and Congress have absolutely no idea how banks work or why they are regulated
Narrow banks are not risky themselves - they are utterly safe - only risky for the banks by forcing them compete
English
Exahash retweetledi

The deceit here is that it is not the paying of yield on a balance per se that necessitates bank-like regulations, but rather the lending out or rehypothecation of the dollars that make up the underlying balance. The GENIUS Act explicitly forbids stablecoin issuers from doing the latter. Stablecoins ≠ Deposits.
CoinDesk@CoinDesk
LATEST: @JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon says stablecoins paying yield should be regulated like banks. "If you're going to be holding balances and paying interest, that's a bank. You should be regulated like a bank."
English
Exahash retweetledi

I think my luck has changed.
I saw the blood moon lunar eclipse at the same time as @welovepulp were playing Babies, followed by Common People.
Now my crypto bags are pumping.
Blood Moon Theory might be true @OneMorePeter

English





