
Nacho Patsy
14.1K posts


@CryptoClarity55 @PolymarketMoney Wait until they see the "trump reserve" at work. They'll continue to cheer him on and blame Democrats when it ruins EVERYTHING! 🫠🥳
English

@PolymarketMoney End of an era his decisions have shaped markets in ways many people don’t fully realize.
English

Solo built my own take on “the launchpad”over the past month and a bit. Less than a week away from letting people take it for a spin. I’ll start sharing more in the coming days on the projects twitter.
@shiftinctrl
English

Shorting some bitcoin:native here at $79.424
neticXBT@neticXBT
Longing some bitcoin:native here at $76.461
English

today is a turning point for $PUMP and pump fun
I want to give more context on the bigger picture and where we're actually going.
over the past ~9 months, 100% of revenue went into buybacks. basically no other platform in crypto has done that at this scale.
however, we received ongoing feedback specifically on the feeling of a lack of trust - in the certainty of buybacks, in what would happen to the bought-back tokens, even in whether the business itself would be here in a year.
today, we’re changing that.
it started with burning ~$370M worth of $PUMP purchases. ~36% of the circulating supply removed from circulation, forever.
but that isn’t enough. we’ve also allocated 50% of our next year of revenue to programmatic buybacks & burns. no more uncertainty for those who believe in us & those we’re proud to call our community.
but why not 100%? the short answer is the business simply needs the other 50% to grow.
a large treasury gives us the flexibility to make big bets over the next 5-10 years, and 50% of ongoing revenue enables us to build better products, infrastructure & reinvest into the ecosystem. I am extremely confident that 50% of the business we're building toward will dwarf 100% of the business we have today.
Pump.fun@Pumpfun
The future of $PUMP We have burned ALL bought back $PUMP tokens, around $370M worth of purchases (~36% of circulating supply), to gain trust with our community. On top of that, we have initiated a programmatic buyback *and burn* scheme at 50% of revenue for the next year to instill trust, predictability, and sustainability for the underlying ecosystem - and to remove as much of the supply from circulation as possible. $PUMP is changing; for the better of token holders, the team and the ecosystem. Learn more about why we’ve made these decisions and where we’re headed next 👇
English


@bzingers This isn't "interesting" or "Informative" and very disrespectful.
Do the right thing and take this shit down!
A.I. is toxic here! 🚫
English

@CaptainScio Yes I gave up seeking a following long ago for that reason. If you're marked it doesn't seem to matter what you do. Sad to see.
English

@thematrixb0t The new trend of making a valid criticism of the political class that they are a part of in every way, to garner support from the working class that they exploit.
English

If you keep waiting for evidence to have permission to feel a certain way or be a certain way, you're always going to be a slave to your external environment
And you're always going to feel a very intense doubt that stop you from moving forward
Take charge of shifting yourself, recommit to your own vision again and again.
English

I got free bitcoin from the faucet btc.day/cashapp.html #BitcoinDay
English



Claude, Organisms, and Memecoins: Signal vs Noise
A new trend has emerged on pump.fun: memecoins paired with Claude AI and a living organism, funded by token communities rather than venture capital. The idea is compelling. The execution across most projects is not.
Out of 100+ "by Claude" projects, only 4 are real. Here's how I verified them.
Where It Started:
The origin is @TrophyTomatoSol - a tomato plant kept alive by Claude AI making real-time decisions about water, light, and nutrients. Day 57 and counting. The system is connected to physical sensors and actuators. The plant lives or dies based on AI decisions.
Built by @d33v33d0 after months of infrastructure development before any token existed, the project centers on a single question: Can AI sustain life?
The critical detail most imitators miss: the system existed before the coin.
Why This Matters:
What made Sol important wasn't just the technology - it was the funding model. VCs fund predictable outcomes and proven markets. Weird experiments? Questions nobody asked? They won't touch it.
Instead of VC capital with strings attached, Sol's trading fees funded better equipment and increased scientific rigor. The project recently onboarded a molecular biologist, compensated via a percentage of fees, to formalize methodology.
This model funds curiosity, not predictability. It turns genuine interest into sustainable funding for projects traditional finance won't support.
As Martin put it: "VCs want returns. This model wants answers."
The Problem:
The model was immediately copied - superficially.
Search "by Claude" on pump.fun: 11 pages of results. "Chicken by Claude", "Banana by Claude", "Driving by Claude" - plants, animals, and activities all claiming AI involvement.
After verification, the majority are either misleading or outright scams: fake livestreams, generic AI text detached from footage, vague claims, and no verifiable integration. They borrow Sol's credibility while delivering nothing but exit liquidity.
What's Actually Real:
After filtering for verifiable, continuously operating systems, only four projects show evidence of genuine experimentation:
1. Sol The Trophy Tomato (@TrophyTomatoSol by @d33v33d0) - AI-managed plant life with real sensors and actuators
2. Claude Fish Market Maker (@ClaudeFishMM) - AI trading informed by live fish behavior
3. Edward by Claude (@Edwardbyclaude by @imandrei_fyi) - AI-assisted behavioral monitoring of a Syrian hamster named Edward
4. Betta Protocol (@BettaProtocol) - Betta fish observation using custom YOLO computer vision and AI-generated observational analysis
Four real projects across eleven pages of listings.
How to Spot the Difference:
Red flags:
- No continuous livestream, or an obvious looped feed
- No consistent iterations by developers
- Generic observations anyone could write
- "Coming soon" features instead of live systems
- Anonymous teams with no technical footprint
Green flags:
- Verifiable 24/7 uptime
- Specific tooling disclosed (YOLO, OpenCV, named APIs)
- Vision-based observations tied to live footage
- Visible hardware integration
- Public builders, open iteration, documented failures
The Reality Check:
Out of 100+ "by Claude" projects, only four demonstrate genuine technical integration. The rest are fake streams, and cash-grab imitations.
This isn't about ambition or early-stage constraints. It's about falsifiability. Real experiments accept the risk of being wrong. Most failed projects are designed to avoid that risk entirely.
The Sol model proved collective funding can support meaningful research. It also attracts grifters at a 25:1 ratio. The mechanism that enables genuine inquiry also enables exit scams at scale.
The Choice:
This trend can fund serious questions about AI and life; questions traditional institutions won't support. Or it can devolve into another memecoin graveyard littered with rugpulls.
The difference isn't technology. It's standards.
Builders must prove legitimacy. Communities must demand proof.
Verify the tech. Demand live operation. Require the possibility of failure. Don't fund performance masquerading as research.
Be safe. DYOR. Don't get rugged❤️
English











