kulak

Le Parti Communiste a lancé une campagne de solidarité avec Cuba face au blocus des États-Unis. On envoie des containers remplis de matériel médical. N'hésitez pas à faire don sur la cagnotte qui finance cette campagne : uncontainerpourcuba.fr

Socialism is humanitarianism.

Vadim Papura était un jeune communiste ukrainien. Il a été brûlé vif le 2 Mai 2014 à Odessa avec 50 de ses camarades, par une horde de fascistes soutenus par l'Occident. Il avait 17 ans. Les coupables n'ont jamais été condamnés. Le pouvoir ukrainien les protège depuis 12 ans.

List one thing Trotskyist revolutionaries have ever accomplished. Here is "socialism in one countries" list of successful revolutions: People's Republic of China (1949), Democratic People's Republic of Korea (1948), Democratic Republic of Vietnam (1945), German Democratic Republic (1949), People's Republic of Poland (1947), Czechoslovak Socialist Republic (1948), Hungarian People's Republic (1949), Socialist Republic of Romania (1947), People's Republic of Bulgaria (1946), People's Republic of Albania (1946), Cuba (1959), People's Republic of Angola (1975), People's Republic of Mozambique (1975), People's Democratic Republic of Ethiopia (1974), People's Republic of the Congo (1969), Democratic Republic of Afghanistan (1978), Lao People's Democratic Republic (1975), People's Republic of Kampuchea (1979), People's Democratic Republic of Yemen (1967), Sandinista Nicaragua (1979), Grenada (1979), Burkina Faso (1983).

@vivo2hin @Intorsers074 Truely the most Nobel of all men

Man tirelessly worked for the revolution since his youth - escaping police, bullets, prisons Broke his body, lost his speech, didn't mind a heart stroke & kept working Yet only has a smile on his face in the end

Ça fait 10 ans que les anti-complotistes de Conspiracy Watch nient l'ingérence des États-Unis au Venezuela et l'action de la CIA contre Maduro. Mais certains à gauche continuent de les écouter alors que les faits leur ont donné tort sur la plupart des dossiers internationaux :

What’s the matter capitalism boy, afraid you might have competition?

Bon 1er Mai aux travailleuses et aux travailleurs !

@friedmann_20843 @Un_spectre Only 40%? we got Stalin right here I see

@Un_spectre Horrible! En tant que défenseur du capitalisme, je donne un pourboire de 40% a mon proprio bien aimée qui prends tout les risques pour moi.

🚨🤯🤯🤯 LE MARCHÉ DU LOGEMENT CHINOIS S’EFFONDRE ! 📉 👉 Suite à la terrible décision de la dictature COMMUNISTE de LOGER sa POPULATION, on craint désormais que des millions de landlords vont devoir trouver un vrai travail !

@DefiWimar Des centaines de millions de gens vont pouvoir se loger plus facilement, et c'est exactement l'objectif du Parti Communiste Chinois.

The red army liberated Germany from fascism on this day.

#OTD On 30 April 1945, the Soviet red flag was raised over the Reichstag marking the great anti-fascist victory over Nazi Germany. 🚩 “Anyone who loves freedom, owes such a debt to the Red Army that it can never be repaid” - Ernest Hemingway

🇨🇳 China is gradually selling US treasuries and buying gold.

🚨 DERNIÈRES NOUVELLES La Chine et la Russie signeront un accord de défense avec l'Iran pour protéger l'Iran contre Israël et les États-Unis !!!

Lenin on putting the petit-bourgeoisie and bourgeoisie to work for the revolution while not granting them any political power… (5-minute read) ----- Comrade Sosnovsky, editor of Byednota has brought me a remarkable book. As many workers and peasants as possible should be made familiar with it. Most valuable lessons, splendidly illustrated by vivid examples, are to be drawn from it on some of the major problems of socialist construction. … Let me give a brief example from Comrade Todorsky's narrative. It was suggested that “merchant hands” should not be allowed to go “unemployed”, but should be encouraged to “set to work”. << “. . .With this end in view, three young, energetic and very businesslike manufacturers, E. Yefremov, A. Loginov and N. Kozlov, were summoned to the Executive Committee and ordered on pain of imprisonment and confiscation of all property to set up a sawmill and tannery. The work was started immediately.”>> <<“. . .The Soviet authorities were not mistaken in their choice of men, and the manufacturers, to their credit, were among the first to realize that they were not dealing with ‘casual and temporary guests’, but with real masters who had taken power firmly into their hands.”>> <<“. . .Having quite rightly realized this, they set to work energetically to carry out the orders of the Executive Committee, with the result that Vesyegensk now has a sawmill going at full swing, covering the needs of the local population and filling orders for a new railway under construction.”>> <<“. . .As to the tannery, the premises are now ready, and the engine, drums and ether machinery, obtained from Moscow, are being installed, so that in a month and a half, or two at the most, Vesyegonsk will be getting fine leather of its own make.”>> <<“. . .The building of two Soviet plants by ‘non-Soviet’ hands is a good example of how to fight a class which is hostile to us.”>> <<“. . .To rap the exploiters over the knuckles, to render them harmless or ‘finish them off’, is only half the job. The whole job will be done only when we compel them to work, and with the fruits of their labour help to improve the new life and strengthen Soviet power.”>> These fine and absolutely true words should be carved in stone and prominently displayed in every Economic Council, food organization, factory, land department and so on. For what has been understood by our comrades in remote Vesyegonsk is all too often stubbornly ignored by Soviet officials in the capitals. It is quite common to meet a Soviet intellectual or worker, a Communist, who turns his nose up at the mere mention of co-operative societies and declares with an air of profound importance—and with equally profound stupidity—that these are not Soviet hands, they are bourgeois people, shopkeepers, Mensheviks, that at such and such a time and place the co-operators used their financial manipulations to conceal aid given to whiteguards, and that in our Socialist Republic the supply and distribution apparatus must be built up by clean Soviet hands. Such arguments are typical insofar as the truth is so mixed with falsehood that we consequently get a most dangerous distortion of the aims of communism that can do incalculable harm to our cause. The co-operatives certainly are an apparatus of bourgeois society, an apparatus which grew up in an atmosphere of “shopkeeping” and which has trained its leaders in the spirit of bourgeois politics and in a bourgeois outlook, and has therefore been producing a large proportion of whiteguards or their accomplices. That is undeniable. But it is a bad thing when absurd conclusions are drawn from undeniable truths, by their oversimplification and slapdash application. We can only build communism out of the material created by capitalism, out of that refined apparatus which has been molded under bourgeois conditions and which-as far as concerns the human material in the apparatus-is therefore inevitably imbued with the bourgeois mentality. That is what makes the building of communist society difficult, but it is also a guarantee that it can and will be built. In fact, what distinguishes Marxism from the old, utopian socialism is that the latter wanted to build the new society not from the mass human material produced by bloodstained, sordid, rapacious, shopkeeping capitalism, but from very virtuous men and women reared in special hothouses and cucumber frames. Everyone now sees that this absurd idea really is absurd and everyone has discarded it, but not everyone is willing or able to give thought to the opposite doctrine of Marxism and to think out how communism can (and should) be built from the mass human material which has been corrupted by hundreds and thousands of years of slavery, serfdom, capitalism, by small individual enterprise, and by the war of every man against his neighbor to obtain a place in the market, or a higher price for his product or his labour. The co-operatives are a bourgeois apparatus. Hence they do not deserve to be trusted politically; but this does not mean we may turn our backs on the task of using them for administration and construction. Political distrust means we must not put non-Soviet people in politically responsible posts. It means the Cheka must keep a sharp eye on members of classes, sections or groups that have leanings towards the whiteguards. … Political distrust of the members of a bourgeois apparatus is legitimate and essential. But to refuse to use them in administration and construction would be the height of folly, fraught with untold harm to communism. If anybody tried to recommend a Menshevik as a socialist, or as a political leader, or even as a political adviser, he would be committing a great mistake, for the history of the revolution in Russia has definitely shown that the Mensheviks (and the Socialist-Revolutionaries) are not socialists, but petty-bourgeois democrats who are capable of siding with the bourgeoisie every time the class struggle between the proletariat and the bourgeoisie becomes particularly acute. But petty-bourgeois democracy is not a chance political formation, not an exception, but a necessary product of capitalism. And it is not only the old, pre-capitalist, economically reactionary middle peasants who are the “purveyors” of this democracy. So, too, are the co-operative societies with their capitalist training that have sprung from the soil of large-scale capitalism, the intellectuals, etc. After all, even backward Russia produced, side by side with the Kolupayevs and Razuvayevs, capitalists who knew how to make use of the services of educated intellectuals, be they Menshevik, Socialist-Revolutionary or non-party. Are we to be more stupid than those capitalists and fail to use such “building material” in erecting a communist Russia? ----- From 'A Little Picture In Illustration Of Big Problems,' 1919 marxists.org/archive/lenin/…

Long live Vietnam long live Ho Chi Minh long live the PLF 🇻🇳

Long live the eastern bloc

Lenin ve bütün eserleri.

NATO, a Cold War relic, is due for abolition The reason for NATO's existence was wrong in 1949, and it's still wrong in 2026. peoplesworld.org/article/nato-a…