기린젊은이_Giraffe
772 posts

기린젊은이_Giraffe
@young_giraffe01
도쿄 거주 중, 트워터는 참 재미있는 공간입니다.


<2억있다고 포르쉐사면 바보다> 난 차를 광적으로 좋아하는 차 매니아다. 20대초반에 운이좋아 코인불장으로 돈을 많이 벌었을때, 포르쉐매장에 가서 계약까지 했었는데 그때 당시 만난 '귀인'이 해준말덕분에 취소하고 국산차로 첫차를 샀다. 그 '귀인'은 사치품을 살때는 늘 '6프로의 법칙'을 지킨다고 했는데, 자산의 6프로가 넘어가면 쳐다도보지않고 사지도않는다는거였다. 즉 아반떼 3000만원짜리를 사려고해도 약 5억이 필요하다는얘기. 그때 당시의 나의 '귀인'은 나와는 사회적위치도 너무나도 차이났기에 난 맹신했고, 그덕에 지금까지도 기회비용을 날리지않았다고 생각한다.




The CIA didn't hide a cancer cure. The pharmaceutical industry made it unprofitable to pursue one. I've been using antiparasitic drugs like ivermectin and mebendazole in my cancer protocols since 2017. Not because cancer is a parasite. That's an oversimplification that leads people down the wrong path. It's because parasites and cancer cells run the same biological playbook: hijack the host, evade immune detection, replicate, spread. Drugs designed to disrupt one can hit the other. What I've seen clinically is that these drugs, when used properly alongside immunotherapy, can extend lives that the conventional system had written off. But they're not magic bullets. Every cancer is different. Dosing matters. Combinations matter. I've also seen cases where fenbendazole appeared to accelerate tumor growth when used incorrectly. The science here requires precision. Mebendazole has over 200 published studies showing anti-cancer activity. The evidence has been building in plain sight for years. The real question isn't why the CIA had this document. It's why drugs that cost a few dollars per dose still can't get funding for large-scale cancer trials. You already know the answer.


























