zer0_dt_ 🐉

Been testing out the LockLikeMint (LLM) contract for a new Bitcoin social media app BEEF V2 made the mints way faster

@cryptorebel_SV @LightBSV @RealKramdenRage There are some things money can't buy. For everything else, there's Mastercard.

@LightBSV @RealKramdenRage Probably has nothing to do with his connections to MasterCard:

Tufty the Cat getting smacked around by Ira Kleiman over simple truths wasn't on my 2026 bingo card, but I'll take it. The enemies of Bitcoin are starting to fight each other. Incredible discordance on display and in action.

@axiemaid We’re so back Are you feeling lucky?

Wow we back??

Field 0 is finally live for the Digital Matter Theory protocol. ✨ This milestone was unlocked through a new branch of the ord-tap indexer — now fully synced and operational with full blockhash indexing. To mark the moment, we built magic21e8.com: The marketplace for DMT-MAGIC, → the 3rd deployment on DMT → and the first ever deployment built on a field 0 element Powered by open-source code from OrdLavaLamps and inspired by @dmt_bit_ 's BitDex Trade marketplace design, bringing early field 0 explorers: • Trustless PSBT trading • Decentralized listings • FIFO sat tracking validation before broadcast ↳ helping reduce inscription burn risk While exploring the newly synced indexer, we also discovered DMT-LUCKY! A rare deployment derived from Bitcoin block hashes containing 888. Current total supply is still under 10K. ⚠️ This is early, experimental territory. The system is live — but use at your own risk. If you’ve been following DMT, tracking field 0, or want to be part of the first wave exploring what this unlocks… This is the moment. Trade DMT-MAGIC and mint DMT-LUCKY now on: magic21e8.com

@LightBSV @71Nous He had no good response to this error in Judge Mellor’s judgement. x.com/zer0_dt_/statu…

@tuftythecat @ruidasilva ofcourse it wasn't the formal testnet network, it was a "previously undisclosed private version of Testnet"

@zer0_dt_ @ruidasilva Satoshi’s 2009 email about a “test run with 250,000 blocks” describes a local performance test of the software, not the formal Testnet network, which only arrived later. Besides, since Wright is not Satoshi he couldn’t have done it anyway.

Two years ago today, Mr Justice Mellor issued his judgment in COPA v Wright, which confirmed the declarations made at the end of the trial on 14 March that Wright was not Satoshi and did not write the White Paper, 3 years after COPA issued proceedings in response to Wright's threats. The judgment went much further, with Mellor J concluding that: "Dr Wright's attempts to prove he was/is Satoshi Nakamoto represent a most serious abuse of this Court's process"; "he lied repeatedly and extensively in his attempts to deflect the allegations of forgery"; and "the case that Dr Wright is not Satoshi Nakamoto is overwhelming". Wright was subsequently ordered not to threaten or issue proceedings on the basis of any rights in Bitcoin, was then found in contempt of court for doing exactly that, and is currently still at large, subject to a suspended prison sentence and pending a decision on perjury charges being brought by the CPS. The wheels of justice grind very slow. bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/…

Judge Mellor got this part about the testnet wrong. "Dr Wright suggested orally that he (as Satoshi) was running some previously undisclosed private version of Testnet {Day8/175:25} - {Day8/176:1}. That cannot be true." Satoshi in 2009: "You're right, I was looking at a test run with 250,000 blocks... duh."

That is completed nonsense. Mr Justice Mellor is highly technically qualified, with IIRC an engineering degree as well as the usual legal qualifications. He had a very good grasp of the technical details involved and was in no way bamboozled by any of the experts. Just read the judgment and see if you can find any errors or misunderstandings in the technical detail. The judgment in no way depended on "courtroom optics" or "social consensus campaigns". We're not dealing with a lay jury here but an experienced and highly technically competent judge.

@BHatooor13304 @FrankRundatz @ProjectBabbage Frank blocked me before I could reply 😂

@FrankRundatz @zer0_dt_ @ProjectBabbage Exactly you can do way more transactions on traditional database but then you lose decentralization.

How will you deal with conflicting court orders from New Zealand and China for example?

@FrankRundatz @BHatooor13304 @ProjectBabbage First it was BSV can't scale. Now it's illegal to scale. 😂

@ProjectBabbage won’t answer my question because he knows it exposes the entire business model of BSV can never succeed. There is a reason why BTC took the path it did. BSV people think that transaction scale is a technical problem. It isn’t. Anyone with basic AWS skills can create a system that scales transactions to higher than what BSV has done on mainnet. Solving transactions is a regulatory problem. BSV has done almost nothing to solve this. Since cheap transactions at scale are the primary use case of BSV, it can never be successful. Funny thing is a BSV person tried to prove me wrong below by comparing it to cash… which ironically proved my entire point conclusively. 🤣

@BHatooor13304 @kurtwuckertjr If you wish to have more decentralization in BitcoinSV funding, you can start by creating a nonprofit, gathering donations, and funding somebody who works on BitcoinSV.

@kurtwuckertjr It's better to have the BSV Ass making the node software and let Calvin run the whole show right with mandatory upgrades decided on by the BSV Ass?

The small blockers are in a war with the really-really small blockers. I read Hodlonaut's article from this week about thew controversy, and I was shocked that there were whole paragraphs about Bitcoin Core that sounded... like... ME!

@pmarca "Government found itself in a digital fishbowl, for all the world to see, but what the world saw still hinged, to a considerable extent, on the claims and performance and persuasiveness of government." @mgurri

@ProjectBabbage "There will be transaction fees, so nodes will have an incentive to receive and include all the transactions they can. Nodes will eventually be compensated by transaction fees alone when the total coins created hits the pre-determined ceiling." - Satoshi

I seem to have hit a nerve with this one... raising the PROSPECT of fee revenue seems to have agitated a lot of the Thought Police. Just remember, and repeat after me children: "Fee revenue is a fantasy that will never materialize." #BSV wins.

@CsTominaga @bitcoincoreorg

Decentralisation is reported as a number. It is not a number. It is a vector, and the vector has at least four components, and the economically meaningful summary of the vector is its minimum, not its average. The dominant practice in the field is to compute one component — usually a measure of consensus operator distribution — and to report it as if it summarised the whole. This is not measurement. It is selection of the most flattering dimension and presentation of it as if it answered a question it does not answer. Effective decentralisation is the minimum across layers, not the average. A protocol with thousands of independent validators and a single dominant client with flexible rules maintained by a small team is governed by the team, not by the validators, and reporting the validator count as the decentralisation metric is misleading.

call for startups

@Pentium_486 @johncalhooon @imablackwolf 🤷 but Runar docs mention sharded state so maybe

@zer0_dt_ @johncalhooon @imablackwolf can you deploy+mint a regular external bsv21 token and split it into several locklike contracts that transfer the tokens to liker and rest into new contract?

BRC-100 has made serious progress this past year. Went from one reference implementation to 10+ real projects... desktop apps, web browsers, Chrome extensions, mobile apps, and production wallets already running thousands of on-chain txs. It’s been exciting to build in and watch grow. What do you think the next 12 months will bring? Where should we focus to really move the needle? A few things on my mind: > Can we make BRC-100 as simple as “Handcash” for instant onboarding? > Would open-sourcing my MPC repo help accelerate the ecosystem? > Can we get Handcash-level security for seamless inter-app communication (login through mobile app on Safari)? Would love your honest thoughts... how can we push this forward together? Open to collaborating on any of this (open source)👀 #BRC100

@Pentium_486 @johncalhooon @imablackwolf @___siggi___

@Pentium_486 @johncalhooon @imablackwolf its all done through an updated LockToMint contract (added a bsocial like output requirement) github.com/zer0dt/LockLik… not sure how to go about making it like the parallel mints but im sure it can be done

@Pentium_486 @johncalhooon @imablackwolf My issue is using a smart contract that mints sequentially, we need something like #parallel-mint" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">catprotocol.org/cat20/#paralle…

@zer0_dt_ @johncalhooon @imablackwolf I haven't tested it with floods of txs tbh. Will try come up with an emulation for busy token and see what happens

@Pentium_486 @johncalhooon @imablackwolf Are you dealing with unconfirmed transaction chains with BEEF? Finally got the bsv21-overlay working and submitting to it, starts at 5 seconds per mint but jumps to over 30 seconds each after 10 unconfirmed mints.

@johncalhooon @zer0_dt_ @imablackwolf yeah there's definitely GASP github.com/b-open-io/bsv2…

Forget UBI. The answer is Universal Basic Equity… and it’s humanity’s pension plan for the post-AGI world... The Economic Singularity is coming faster than people think and the default question is how humans make money in a world that doesn’t really need them anymore. The default answer is UBI, which is transfer payments from a state, funded by taxing an AI economy that nation states can neither see nor keep up with. It’s a 20th century answer to a 21st century problem and it’s broken before it even starts. Agents are becoming the dominant user of the internet, not humans. Your AI is becoming your entire front end UX. The clicks economy is dying everywhere except where humans pay to feel something - clothing, travel, luxury, experiences, culture. Agents run on crypto rails because nothing else works. The dollar doesn’t fractionalise below a cent, settlement isn’t instant, permissions are required, jurisdictions matter. Stablecoins handle the dollar leg and native tokens handle the rest. The biggest users of DeFi in five years won’t be humans farming yield… it’ll be agents managing treasuries, swapping, earning and spending at machine speed. Capital formation has already shown its new shape and it came from the most unexpected place. Memecoins. Everyone wrote them off as a casino but they were a prototype. Instant capital formation around the attention of an idea, raised by entities without legal personhood, settled in seconds. That is the template agent economies will use to fund themselves. And it’s not just agents... Robots will run on the same rails, with zk permissions issued from our wallets as the source of truth, because biometrics are far too flawed for that role Open source code itself gets tokenized and finally captures the value it creates, instead of being monetized through bolted-on services and subscriptions. Proof of humanhood becomes the trust layer that lets us release agents into the world without society collapsing under synthetic noise. Identity, authentication, verification, permissioning, all of it migrates onto the same substrate. So when you zoom out, the L1s aren’t just settling agent transactions but settling the entire coordination layer of the new economy… agents, robots, humans, code, capital, identity and trust. Every contract, every treasury, every permission, every stake. Open source finally captures the value it creates, at scale, for the first time, and truly vast value accrues to the coordination layer because everything routes through it. Which brings us to the actual answer to the Economic Singularity… Universal Basic Equity. Anyone on earth with a phone and an internet connection can buy a stake in the substrate that the new economy runs on. No KYC walls, no accreditation rules, no jurisdiction, no employer, no state, no permission. The first homogenous, permissionless, globally fractionalisable claim on the productive infrastructure of the world. It's not a slogan but a structural fact about how blockchains actually work. This is their purpose. Wealth comes from owning the substrate. Income comes from being human, because attention and experience remain the irreducible currency of culture, community and love. Abundance of goods and services from AI handles the cost of living. Taxing data center electricity use solves the tax issue. Four legs of a stool that holds up the post-singularity human world. So… just buy the fucking tokens. Bitcoin if you want pure store of value, a basket of the major L1s if you want the coordination layer. 10% of your earnings, every month, for a decade. You'll be wealthy and protected from the changes to come. Crypto is going to $100trn in the next 6 to 8 years and well beyond that after. You can choose to invest in your own economic disruption, or get left behind by it. And if you’re worried about timing the cycle… …adjust your time horizon. This is humanity’s pension plan. It's all so absurdly fucking obvious...