Matt, (@CryptoCoffee369) I’m going to be completely straight with you. You’re one of the most engaged readers of The Nexus. I know that because you’re subscribed, you open virtually everything we send, and at one point your open rate was sitting at around 99%. You are clearly reading the publication closely, regularly taking intel from the work we put out, and then turning the same subjects into content for your own audience. What you never seem to do is acknowledge where that work came from. A little while ago, I even joked publicly about you being our most dedicated reader and posted the screenshots. In the same message, I told you that you could switch the CipherBot emails back on because I had reduced them from ten a day to five a week. You never replied. You never acknowledged The Nexus. But shortly afterwards, you turned the CipherBot articles back on. So clearly, you saw the message. Then today, the same thing happens again. You read our Bonzo Lend article, liked the post, and then created your own content around the same story without so much as a mention of The Nexus or a simple acknowledgment of the publication you are repeatedly getting value from. We put a serious amount of time, money and effort into building an independent PulseChain publication. We are trying to grow it, and support from major PulseChain voices would make an enormous difference. Nobody is asking you to promote everything we publish. But when you are consistently using our research and reporting as source material, giving the publication a basic nod is hardly an unreasonable expectation. You present yourself as someone who supports the PulseChain community. Supporting the community should also mean supporting the people doing the work behind the scenes, not quietly extracting value from them while pretending they do not exist. Honestly, it is becoming difficult to see this as an oversight. It looks deliberate, and it is incredibly poor form.
