Daniel Searer

@Mangan150 Fascinating, I live by fantastic mountain bike riding, we regularly exceed these limits, certainly yours and often Attia’s, not for fitness purposes, but for the fun of the rides. Seemingly we’d better off not riding as much, but then we miss out on the fun = dilemma

A single bout of exercise, 4 min at 90% HRmax, increased VO2max to a similar extent as 4 bouts of 4 min, when done 3×/wk for 10 weeks. 1. If you train at high intensity, you don't need long duration or high frequency 2. There are sharply diminishing returns to exercise

@VlanciPictures I am a lawyer and I hope you are correct!

Pro Tip Don't call yourself Robin Hood if you are going to turn your back on the folks in Sherwood forest after one phone call from the Sheriff of Nottingham @RobinhoodApp #RobinHood

@TerryJones0001 Not sure why the use the word “mining” in the description.

Funny how they don't extradite any traditional legacy Banksters isn't it?...👇

@RobertMCutler @TheAliceSmith @swcrisis Nice talking to you. Have a great day!

@zymph2 @TheAliceSmith @swcrisis I know scientists with a background, even a dissertation, in philosophy of science but who then decided to do real science. They look back fondly and it helps them be critical of socially conditioned rhetoric but has no direct relevance to their daily activities.

It always stuns me how few professional scientists have any knowledge about the history or philosophy of science.

@RobertMCutler @TheAliceSmith @swcrisis I’m neither. I’m a practicing attorney. Law became more fulfilling to me when I took an interest in its philosophy, history and foundations, hence my interest in the subject of philosophy of various disciplines. Most lawyers have no use or time for the philosophy of law.

@zymph2 @TheAliceSmith @swcrisis Birds are the scientists, philosophers of science are the ornithologists. Still not clear whether you are either a scientist or a philosopher of science or neither.

@RobertMCutler @TheAliceSmith @swcrisis In Feynman’s analogy, do the birds represent the scientists? I accept that understanding the philosophy of a discipline is not necessary to its practice. Still seems useful especially when error is encountered.

@zymph2 @TheAliceSmith @swcrisis What seems useful to you is not necessarily what is useful to science. Are you a philosopher of science? That would be interesting. You would lose that bet about the birds.

@RobertMCutler @TheAliceSmith @swcrisis Wisdom imports knowledge of what is true or right, so the philosophy of science is an examination of why the scientific method gives premises bearing on what is true or right -seems to be useful to me. I’m betting birds know more ornithology than Feynman gave them credit for.

@zymph2 @TheAliceSmith @swcrisis Philosophy is "love of wisdom". Science is "knowing". Not the same thing. “Philosophy of science is about as useful to scientists as ornithology is to birds.” – Richard Feynman (It's a real quotation.)

@RobertMCutler @TheAliceSmith @swcrisis Given that the word “philosophy” imports “the fundamental nature of a thing”, in this case, “science”, as a layperson, not schooled in “science”, I too, would believe that understanding the fundamental nature of your job would be useful.

@TheAliceSmith @swcrisis It's not their job, and it's not useful to their job. Your astonishment is akin to being surprised that applied mathematicians are unacquainted vast areas of pure math.

@sherpalou Especially when presented with their kissing cousins, Mr. and Mrs. Ad Hominem.

Strawmen are very popular

@EraseState If any of them read this tweet I’d expect to hear it before midnight tonight.

@LA_libertarian1 @cottonarchist The balance, what otherwise would be a profit, going to their charitable purpose or some other 501(c)(3) or similar qualifying type of entity

@cottonarchist They're technically nonprofit after all salaries and expenses are paid.

@LA_libertarian1 Hah! Interesting point. I can’t picture Trump ever resigning.

Nixon's first VP resigned so Nixon assigned a new one, Gerald Ford. Then Nixon resigned and an unelected man became a U.S. president. Biden doesn't need to die for Kamala to be president. He just needs to resign. The DNC wanted Kamala all along. Could start a dangerous trend.

@ch4rlus @ProfFeynman @EtienneKlein I vote for memorizing the list of fallacy types

@ProfFeynman @EtienneKlein Question everything, yes but with proper methodology. Otherwise they may just believe "alternative facts". What about teaching the methodology?

The problem is not people being uneducated. The problem is that people are educated just enough to believe what they have been taught, and not educated enough to question anything from what they have been taught. 🧠

@miamids @ProfFeynman Why are they not entitled to question?

@ProfFeynman I think today the problem is that there is an increasing number of people who are not educated and feel entitled to question everything just because they watched a video

@benjyminty @FredNurf @ProfFeynman @KetoCarnivore Which one are we better off questioning from?

@FredNurf @ProfFeynman @KetoCarnivore Not true. Questioning from a position of ignorance is not the same as questioning from a position of education.

The difference between Knowledge and Experience.

@PrivatizeEdu @PeterRQuinones Peter! You are still on mute!

@PeterRQuinones Same as it ever was, and “usufruct”? I had to look that one up

@pawlsonliberty @BloodstaindGem @FInseattle Trump is poor at running the government apparatus and bureaucrats are demoralized so it’s a de facto step toward libertarianism. Best I can say for him. With Democrats, the <$ or abolition of law enfcmt is also de facto libertarianism but I don’t trust them to really do it.

@BloodstaindGem @FInseattle I want to meet some of those people. I know what trump is and libertarian ain't one of them.

It bugs me to see self proclaimed "libertarians" be like "vote red!" Like what the actual fuck.