AWholeWorldofNope

@thespursweb More blatant corruption from the refs, and completely biased commentary from @SkySports @SkyFootball. Long live illegal streaming... Who wants to pay for that utter garbage.

Thoughts on the opening 30 minutes? 👇

@msdev 8 F**KING HOURS TRYING TO ACTIVATE MY LEGIT COPY OF PRO ON MY NEW MB.... MICROSOFT MAKING YOUR LIFE WORSE EVERY DAY

@msdev How about you just stop writing sh*t software, that locks people out of the accounts, for just installing a new motherboard, then refuses to send verifications. Despite putting the correct information in. You're a disgusting and vile organisation, cancer is too nice for you.

The #MicrosoftBuild session catalog is live. Explore 90+ hands-on sessions to help you build, ship, and scale with AI. ➡️ msft.it/6014Q4LPA

@Thatsnogogurt @OwenGregorian WTF are you talking about? CO2 last about 100 years... Methane about 8 years...

@OwenGregorian CO2 doesn't last long enough in the atmosphere to have the effects they claim. Methane and sulfur, on the other hand...

Shock New Evidence Showing No Link Between CO2 and Temperature Over Last Three Million Years Stumps Net Zero Activists | Chris Morrison, Watts Up With That? The climate science world (‘settled’ division) is in shock following the discovery in ancient ice cores that levels of carbon dioxide remained stable as the world plunged into an ice age around 2.7 million years ago. Levels of CO2 at around 250 parts per million (ppm) were said to be lower than often assumed with just a 20 ppm movement recorded for the following near three million-year period. In addition, no changes in methane levels were seen in the entire period. Massive decreases in temperature with occasional interglacial rises appear to have occurred without troubling ‘greenhouse’ gas levels, and this revelation has caused near panic in activist circles. The assumed level three million years ago of CO2 was around 400 ppm, a convenient mark that has been used to explain the subsequent ice age and a drop to 250 ppm. Due to the recently published paper, this explanation has become more problematic and natural climate variation is correctly noted to have occurred with the temperature changes. Alas, similar explanations are mostly ignored in discussing today’s climate changes in the interests of promoting the Net Zero fantasy. Some cling desperately to a dominant CO2 role, including one of the authors of the findings published in Nature. The co-author states that the results suggest even greater climate sensitivity to the warming effect of CO2. In short, there is a great deal of applying the laws of physics and chemistry to one era, but failing to extend the same courtesy to another. The title of the paper, produced by 17 America-based scientists, was enough to set alarm bells ringing in the ‘settled’ science, Net Zero-obsessed community: ‘Broadly stable atmospheric CO2 and CH4 levels over the past three million years.’ A related paper examining ocean heat content derived from the ice core record was also published. Carrie Lear, Professor of Past Climates and Earth System Changes at Cardiff University, claimed that the papers “don’t rewrite the role of CO2, they underline how sensitive the climate system is… that is why today’s rapid CO2 rise is so alarming”. Ah, yes. Even if CO2 movements are minimal, probably within a margin of potential error, they are still responsible for large variations in temperature. The laws of climate science are ‘settled’ – if the trace atmospheric gas CO2 is rising, falling or generally stable, it is almost wholly responsible for large movements in global temperature. Under this rather shaky assumption, humans must stop burning hydrocarbons and return to a neo-Malthusian pre-industrial age. Study lead author Julia Marks-Peterson noted: “We definitely were a bit surprised. If correct, the findings may suggest that even small changes in greenhouse gas levels could trigger major shifts in climate.” That’s a little bit of a scary thought, she added, possibly with an eye on future grant funding. “May suggest” is doing a lot of the work here, and it may also be suggested that more plausible opinions are available. Quoted in New Scientist magazine, Tim Naish, Professor of Earth Science at Victoria University in New Zealand, said it was “way too early to thrown the baby out with the bathwater”. Perish the thought that baby should be given its marching orders, ending a science-lite 40-year demonisation of CO2 and related promotion of a hard-Left Net Zero dream. The latest Nature-published research gives a snapshot from ancient Antarctica ‘blue’ ice drilled in the Allan Hills area. It looks back further in time past the usual 800,000 ice core records. The key finding is that over the last three million years, when sea levels fell and ice periods intensified, the level of the main ‘greenhouse’ gases remained remarkably stable. For the first time, the work has pushed the direct gas measurements back into the late Pliocene era. Over the last three million years moving into the Pleistocene, global temperatures showed a long-term cooling trend of several degrees Celsius, interrupted by increasingly large interglacial oscillations. Interglacial temperature swings, as in the current Holocene, often see temperatures rise by 5°C and more. Critics seeking to downplay ice core evidence often suggest it is too imprecise to provide a wholly accurate record of gas levels and temperature. But it is accurate enough to give a broad cyclical insight. It remains the source of some of the best data we have on the past climate. It is undoubtedly more accurate than most proxy evidence from millions of years ago. But whatever the evidence used, it is hard to detect any obvious and continuous link between CO2 and temperature across the entire geological record going back 600 million years to the start of abundant life on Earth. Certainly none to justify the political notion that humans control the climate thermostat by burning hydrocarbons. In fact the evidence is so slim that Les Hatton, Emeritus Professor in Computer Science at Kingston University, was recently able to determine from ice core records that 100-year rises of 1.1°C in the current interglacial, which started 20,000 years ago, have occurred in one in six centuries. Going back 150,000 years, the frequency was around one in six to one in 20 centuries. None of these findings suggest that current warming is either unusual or primarily caused by human activity. Needless to say, none of these findings trouble the headline writers in narrative-addicted mainstream media. wattsupwiththat.com/2026/03/28/sho…

@RLMcares @OwenGregorian 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Support? You need stop licking windows, it's not good for your health.

@OwenGregorian More support….

@OwenGregorian 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 What an embarrassing steaming pile of BS. Next you'll be saying the world is flat. The desperation people go to avoid the truth is insane. Nut jobs, the lot of ya.

@cane1712 @teamspeak Okay, I'm using CachyOS, where did you install team speak 6 from... I am choosing between Stoat and TS6 at the moment.

@BlitheringFools @teamspeak Arch

Two new regions are now open for communities creation: Frankfurt 3 and Toronto 1 Regions currently available (with remaining capacity): • Amsterdam (ams-3) 🇳🇱 • Frankfurt (fra-3) 🇩🇪 • Toronto (toronto-1) 🇨🇦 We'll continue monitoring usage across regions and will expand capacity as demand increases 🫡

@toadmeister 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 The daily sceptic, that bunch of brain rotted muppets... Would know the truth if it punched them in the face... Embarrassing.

New evidence from Antarctica ice cores showing no link between CO2 and temperature over the last three million years has stumped Net Zero activists, says Chris Morrison. dailysceptic.org/2026/03/25/sho…

@VoortAnnem42489 @2ch27khrfm @jengleruk @cohler 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 This post says, you know feck all about science, medicine etc. I bet you never read a peer reviewed paper during COVID... Just went to the sites of nuts jobs and just belied what you read there. Hilarious.

@2ch27khrfm @jengleruk @cohler I know… I live in Europe. But my doctor was taught in universities controlled bij big pharma teachings. My doctor told me to get the covid shot after I had already recovered from Covid and only had the sniffles. It was still better to get vaccinated 🤡

As promised, the climate science obliteration has arrived TODAY. The IPCC's central claims have now been torn apart. The oceans are not “warming” let alone “boiling.” That claim is false. The claimed Earth Energy Imbalance is false. It's no different from zero. Full demolition: Cohler et al. (2026) IPCC's Earth Energy Imbalance Assessment is Based on Physically Invalid Argo-Float-Based Estimates of Global Ocean Heat Content doi.org/10.5281/zenodo… Press Release: doi.org/10.5281/zenodo… Easy-to-Read Summary: doi.org/10.5281/zenodo…

@VoortAnnem42489 @jengleruk @cohler @2ch27khrfm Tinfoil hat alert. Tinfoil hat alert.

@jengleruk @cohler @2ch27khrfm Peer reviewed means nothing… we all saw during Covid what a huge hoax it all is. Then I started doing my own research… my conclusion… so little science is reliable. Doctors only know what pharma taught them. Always think critically… your are your own and only advocate.

@cohler @richjayonx @paperintegrity Totally irrelevant? Knowing the peer review process is the important, otherwise any idiot could peer review paper, say that it's good whilst not understanding a thing about the paper they are peer reviewing. It's incredibly important.

@richjayonx @paperintegrity See image attached. The first two points are totally irrelevant to factual mathematical and scientific analysis. And the third one is is blatantly and totally incorrect!!! Read the paper. Post more nonsense like this and you will be BLOCKED. Final warning.

@cane1712 @teamspeak What distro you using?

@BlitheringFools @teamspeak Been pretty stable for me. Ran on a 11$vps with 4 other services and works perfectly

@cane1712 @teamspeak Hearing that there are stability issues for TS6

@BlitheringFools @teamspeak teamspeak is on the aur aur.archlinux.org/packages/teams…

@scarlettzen1 @elonmusk @grok Go away and get some real talent.

@BlitheringFools @elonmusk @grok Have a wonderful day

If it’s allowed in an R-rated movie, it’s allowed in @Grok Imagine

@scarlettzen1 @elonmusk @grok RAM and Storage prices have gone insane for this slop?

@elonmusk @grok Others can’t imagine. Grok can. Grok Imagine

@JeremyVineOn5 No... More worried vile hate and bile, thrown at men, just for being men.

Do you worry about men because of 'toxic masculinity'? Louis Theroux explores the shocking world of proudly misogynistic influencers for a new Netflix documentary on the 'Manosphere'. Does it worry you? Or do you think it is overblown by the media?

@25_cycle @WatchGorillaSci @WillieSoon8 @Martin_Durkin @TomANelson @CuriosityonX Never heard of him, but going on my avoid like the plague list 🤣

@BlitheringFools @WatchGorillaSci @WillieSoon8 @Martin_Durkin @TomANelson @CuriosityonX Could be worse, could be climate denier Willis Eisenbach, the massage therapist and I wish I was making that up🤣🤣🤣

The Big Climate Lie - exposed. Dr Willie Soon looks at the science. @WillieSoon8 @Martin_Durkin @TomANelson @CuriosityonX

@cohler Shut up you muppet. Only idiots believe that shit.

Grok just verified the obliteration of climate science as we know it: x.com/i/grok/share/9…

@cohler It's not peer reviewed at all and posted on an open Site where any can post their BS. Why do you nut jobs resort to lying so much?