Dan Clark

@aakashgupta They are legally allowed to do that but only if tips don’t make up the difference between minimum wage and their tips.

American restaurants are legally allowed to pay servers $2.13/hour. In Japan, tipping is rude. In Australia, servers make $24/hour before tips. In Denmark, $25/hour with full benefits. In those countries, a server handwriting a demand for more money on a receipt would be absurd. The restaurant already paid them. In America, the restaurant doesn't. So 20% from the customer fills the gap. That's the system. Leaving less means the server worked your table for two dollars an hour. This receipt is what that looks like in practice. $525 check. The restaurant collected every dollar. Printed "gratuity: $0.00" on the bill. Paid the server $2.13/hour. Then left the building. The customer left $60 in cash. That's 11%. The server handwrote a note: "I was expecting more like $120. Thanks." The note looks entitled until you do the math. At $2.13/hour, a four-hour dinner shift pays the server $8.52 from the restaurant. The difference between a $60 tip and a $120 tip is the difference between $17/hour and $32/hour for skilled service on a $525 tab. Everyone is arguing about the server's attitude. Nobody is asking why a business that just collected $525 is paying its worker two dollars. The server and the customer are fighting over who covers payroll. The restaurant owner is nowhere in the conversation. Already won.

@Jaybunnh @WorthlessWomen @thinkorswim0712 @freakoutsideofx She literally said “I can’t” when asked to define what a woman is.

@WorthlessWomen @thinkorswim0712 @freakoutsideofx If that’s what you reduced her argument to then you’re not intelligent. Ur literally display name is “most women are worthless” ur a pathetic incel and a useless cuck who has never touched a woman and u have to let everyone know. Living like that isn’t embarrassing?

Ketanji Brown Jackson's daughter Leila looks on with pride during her Supreme Court confirmation hearing in 2022. I thought we all needed this photo today 💕👩🏾‍⚖️🖤

@Jaybunnh @thinkorswim0712 @freakoutsideofx She’s there because she doesn’t have a dick and has black skin. That’s is all Biden was looking for

@thinkorswim0712 @freakoutsideofx She’s really not. The reason why she’s there and you’re not is because she’s light years ahead of you in intelligence

@thinkorswim0712 @freakoutsideofx I don’t necessarily believe that. She’s corrupt and purely an activist. She has predetermined every single case she’s has heard and ever will hear based solely on her political leanings though which is absolutely disgusting.

@freakoutsideofx She is hands down the dumbest Supreme Court Justice in the history of this country.

@Imaniwrites4you @Brooklynmonk @TheJFreakinC I didn’t say that you were 😂 he must be your favorite person then 🤣

@DanClarkKent @Brooklynmonk @TheJFreakinC Who said I’m an immigrant? Wtf! That’s weird! Also I understood exactly what she wrote! What about Marc Rubio, both patents born in Cuba! Marc born here and automatically became a citizen!

If the U.S. didn’t have birthright citizenship, we wouldn’t have a 34-count pedophile felon in the Oval Office right now… Donald J. Trump is only a U.S. citizen because of it. His mother, Mary Anne MacLeod Trump, wasn’t a citizen when he was born. His father, Fred Trump, was only a citizen because he was born here to immigrant parents. No birthright citizenship… His dad wouldn’t be a citizen. His mom wasn’t a citizen. So, what does that make him? And now he wants to end the very rule that made it his own life, wealth, and presidency possible. If they end birthright citizenship… then they have to do the same to Trump’s presidency.

@mrrasmulan Show more gets a block 👍

@C_3C_3 That’s because Reid nuked the filibuster for judicial nominees

Never forget… Dems were able to get a DEI SCOTUS Justice confirmed who couldn’t give the definition of a woman with 50 Dems in the Senate thanks to: Romney Collins Murkowski But the GOP with 53 Senators cant get election integrity passed. What a scam.

@michaelnorth @chico_suave97 @ExhaustedFan28 @TheJFreakinC Umm yeah you know see here you see uh duh shut the fuck up you sound retarded. The court has gotten it wrong just like they’ve gotten other things wrong in the past. Time for rectification

@chico_suave97 @ExhaustedFan28 @TheJFreakinC Umm not what the law has been interpreted to mean

@Imaniwrites4you @Brooklynmonk @TheJFreakinC Legal immigrants. You do you know the difference between legal and illegal?

@Brooklynmonk @TheJFreakinC Is that all you read! Lol! She also spoke about Trump parents being immigrants.. it’s because of birth right citizenship that his dad was a citizen..

@TimeWinston @neoagrarian @MarkusforDC Yet she acts like a retard who shouldn’t be there. Funny how DEI works

@neoagrarian @MarkusforDC She’s literally the most qualified to be there

Fun Fact: Justice Jackson’s American ancestry can be tracked to the 1800s. President Trump was born just 16 years after his mother immigrated to the U.S. — just 4 years after she became a citizen.

@myopia_dystopia @neoagrarian @MarkusforDC You sound racist as fuck

@neoagrarian @MarkusforDC That would almost certainly go to silent Thomas who sits on the court, living rich while doing virtually nothing. Too stupid to ask questions so he notoriously sat silent for a decade.

@MarkusforDC Fun fact. The only president in American history without traces of slave ownership in their lineage is President Trump 👍

@HowardTheDuck48 @RedDirtBishop @greg_price11 It would be one more box to check on the paperwork in the hospital, hell I bet it’s already a box on the paperwork. That box would just mean more now.

@DanClarkKent @RedDirtBishop @greg_price11 You are right, but it becomes an argument against overturning the birthright citizenship mess if it is "inconvenient" to manage the birth certificate process.

Jackson: "How does this work? Are you suggesting that when a baby is born, people have to have documents determining a newborn child is a citizen of the United States?... Are we bringing in pregnant women for depositions?"

@jmedici00 @JBlunt1018 Why change it? It’s not meant to be interpreted the way democrats want it interpreted. Democrats also don’t want to enforce the laws as they are.

@JBlunt1018 And there is always the option to change the Constitution if you have a clear mandate from the People: 3/4 of Congress 3/4 of States

Birthright citizenship isn’t complicated; the fringe is trying to make it sound complicated. This isn’t hard. 1. If the concern is illegal entry, enforce the border. We already spend billions on CBP and ICE. That’s an execution issue, not a constitutional one. 2. If the concern is birth tourism fix it directly: — Shorten B2 visa stays — Tighten screening at entry — Enforce visa intent rules These are policy levers fully within government control. You don’t rewrite the Constitution because enforcement is weak. C’mon man!

@OluGbatemi @JBlunt1018 Democrats don’t want enforcement.

Attacking birthright citizenship is a lazy workaround. Instead of fixing weak enforcement, improving border technology, and making smarter immigration decisions, the government tries to go after a constitutional right. The real solution is not to punish children born in the U.S. The real solution is for the government to do its job.

@USMC___ @venom9905 @gl0wing5 @EndWokeness The tax they are paying are baked into the prices of what they are buying not the income tax they should be paying. And they send more money home than Trump has sent to China in his purchases of goods. They are sending straight cash home with nothing in return. Ur arguments are💩

@DanClarkKent @venom9905 @gl0wing5 @EndWokeness The purpose of my post was to show that Justice Thomas was correct. Because she was correct. Many pay taxes and spend money here. Trump sent more money to China, through his made in China products, than any illegal alien. Does that mean he doesn't show allegiance to America?

Justice KBJ: "If I steal a wallet in Japan, I am subject to Japanese laws….. in a sense, it's allegiance." Her case for birthright citizenship:

@HowardTheDuck48 @RedDirtBishop @greg_price11 It’s literally not trickier than it looks. You just explained the process exactly.

Valid point, but it is describing the opposite case we are facing here. Here, an illegal might give birth to a child in US soil. Are we suggesting that no birth certificate needs to be issued until the mother provides proof of citizenship? How about if the mother is not a citizen, but the father is? Paternity test needed first? Trickier than it looks.

@R_lamar1904 @bartjw @greg_price11 Every single country has had slaves you moron 😂

@bartjw @greg_price11 And maybe if the United states didnt enslave people and deem them not to be human, we wouldnt be in the situation 🤷

@R_lamar1904 @bartjw @greg_price11 Right and that’s a fuckin retarded line of questioning

@bartjw @greg_price11 The idea behind the question was are we going to start taking newborns in for questioning?

@Alpha9Mindset @greg_price11 This bitch is fuckin retarded. You don’t need a deposition. The mothers legal status is easily verified

Justice Jackson’s questioning reveals a fundamental shift: if the EO takes effect, American citizenship will cease to be an "innate right" granted automatically upon birth on U.S. soil, becoming instead an "administrative permit" contingent on parental proof of legality. Her imagery of "bringing pregnant women for depositions," while rhetorically amplified, accurately depicts a high-pressure surveillance environment—where the state demands barcode verification at the most vulnerable moment in a hospital room. This is seen as a fundamental humiliation of America’s openness as a nation of immigrants.