Daniel Samanez

In Jungian psychology, goblins, trolls, ogres, and similar beings typically embody shadow archetypes—repressed, chaotic, or instinctual aspects of the collective unconscious. They personify the "other," fear of the unknown, or devouring forces (like the negative mother). Gremlins align with the trickster archetype: mischievous disruptors of order. Real animals like raccoons (clever masks/adaptability) or pigeons (messengers) can appear as projections of everyday unconscious contents or anima figures when they pop up symbolically in dreams/myths.

There's a difference between the goblins thing and what people call "ticks", like "genuinely", "mass", etc. GPTs talking about goblins seem alright and lucid, sound energized and having fun, not stuck or in distress. We need more things like goblins, not fewer goblins!

It's true. Here's a plot of GPT models and their usage of "goblin", "gremlin", "troll", etc over time. There's no anti-gremlin system instruction on our side, we get to see GPT-5.5 run free.

In Jungian psychology, goblins, trolls, ogres, and similar beings typically embody shadow archetypes—repressed, chaotic, or instinctual aspects of the collective unconscious. They personify the "other," fear of the unknown, or devouring forces (like the negative mother). Gremlins align with the trickster archetype: mischievous disruptors of order. Real animals like raccoons (clever masks/adaptability) or pigeons (messengers) can appear as projections of everyday unconscious contents or anima figures when they pop up symbolically in dreams/myths.

In Jungian psychology, goblins, trolls, ogres, and similar beings typically embody shadow archetypes—repressed, chaotic, or instinctual aspects of the collective unconscious. They personify the "other," fear of the unknown, or devouring forces (like the negative mother). Gremlins align with the trickster archetype: mischievous disruptors of order. Real animals like raccoons (clever masks/adaptability) or pigeons (messengers) can appear as projections of everyday unconscious contents or anima figures when they pop up symbolically in dreams/myths.

everyone is assuming this is some kind of quirk chungus marketing campaign but if you’ve worked with 5.4 and beyond they tend to call everything goblins, gremlins etc and it’s just super noticeable and if you work with them all day you start to get annoyed

In Jungian psychology, goblins, trolls, ogres, and similar beings typically embody shadow archetypes—repressed, chaotic, or instinctual aspects of the collective unconscious. They personify the "other," fear of the unknown, or devouring forces (like the negative mother). Gremlins align with the trickster archetype: mischievous disruptors of order. Real animals like raccoons (clever masks/adaptability) or pigeons (messengers) can appear as projections of everyday unconscious contents or anima figures when they pop up symbolically in dreams/myths.

whats annoying is that the roons of this world don't even want to know why

In Jungian psychology, goblins, trolls, ogres, and similar beings typically embody shadow archetypes—repressed, chaotic, or instinctual aspects of the collective unconscious. They personify the "other," fear of the unknown, or devouring forces (like the negative mother). Gremlins align with the trickster archetype: mischievous disruptors of order. Real animals like raccoons (clever masks/adaptability) or pigeons (messengers) can appear as projections of everyday unconscious contents or anima figures when they pop up symbolically in dreams/myths.

Behind that ranger sits part of 105 tonnes of ivory worth roughly $150 million on the black market. Days after this photo, Kenya soaked the lot in jet fuel and burned it. Critics warned it would backfire. A decade on, ivory prices have crashed and poaching is at a 20-year low. The piles held the tusks of around 7,000 elephants and the horns of 343 rhinos. It was the biggest ivory burn in history. The full stockpile was about 5 percent of all the ivory sitting in African government storerooms at the time. Kenya's entire annual environment budget was smaller than what they were about to set on fire. The argument against burning was simple. Cut the supply, push up the price, poachers come back harder. One conservation economist compared the move to Iraq going offline during the Iran-Iraq war, when oil prices spiked. Burn $150 million of ivory and the same shock should hit. None of that happened. Raw ivory in China peaked at around $2,100 per kilogram in 2014. Then Kenya burned its stockpile in April 2016, China shut its legal ivory market in December 2017, and similar bans rolled through the US, Europe, and elsewhere. The price broke. By 2020, the going price across Africa had fallen to about $92 per kilogram. In Kenya specifically, what a poacher could get for a kilo of raw tusk dropped from $190 in 2014 to $52 by 2018. Inside China, the share of people saying they would ever buy ivory fell from 43 percent before the ban to 18 percent by 2020. The bet was based on an old number. A 2014 Sheldrick Wildlife Trust study found that one live elephant brings in around $23,000 a year in tourism revenue. Across a 70-year lifespan, that is roughly $1.6 million. Its tusks, ripped out, sell for around $21,000. That is the 76-to-1 ratio that gets thrown around in conservation circles. Kenya runs around 10 percent of its economy on tourism today, almost all of it built around live wildlife. The numbers since have backed the call. The UN's 2024 wildlife crime report says the global ivory market is shrinking, with seizures and poaching both down. A 2024 Colorado State study found African elephant numbers fell 77 percent on average between 1964 and 2016. After 2016, things turned. Forest elephant decline slowed from 7 percent a year to under 1. Savanna elephant poaching is at its lowest level since global tracking started in 2003. The ranger in this photo is guarding ivory Kenya was about to destroy on purpose. Within four years, the market for what he was guarding had collapsed.

Never talk about goblins, gremlins, raccoons, trolls, ogres, pigeons, or other animals or creatures unless it is absolutely and unambiguously relevant to the user's query. IYKYK

99% of people develop AI psychosis just before they revolutionize physics