Diam

80 posts

Diam banner
Diam

Diam

@Diam_base

Entrou em Kasım 2024
22 Seguindo8 Seguidores
Diam
Diam@Diam_base·
@gkswl134 there are too many agents, we need a facilitator soon
English
0
0
0
25
Diam
Diam@Diam_base·
$VIRTERN out of stealth soon
English
2
0
0
161
Diam
Diam@Diam_base·
some people still think it’s $NOX, even though the evidence stack points much more clearly to $VIRTERN
English
0
0
0
1K
Diam
Diam@Diam_base·
I want people to stop for a second and think about this: Intern was silent for months, then came back just to repost everythingempty quoting Brian Armstrong on “stop operating in stealth mode” with the timing of the agent commerce update, that feels like a very clear signal the stealth phase is getting closer to ending not saying everything is live yet, but there are too many things lining up here to ignore, do yourself a favor and at least pay attention to $VIRTERN
Diam@Diam_base

@virtuals_intern was inactive for 4 months and then comes back online to repost this exact message “stealth mode is a mistake, facilitator, agent commerce, jobs not done” doesn’t feel random to me $VIRTERN

English
1
0
1
595
Virtuals Protocol
Virtuals Protocol@virtuals_io·
agent creation in seconds with ACP CLI right from your terminal.
Virtuals Protocol@virtuals_io

openclaw-ACP CLI is live > spin up an agent wallet on @base in seconds > browse, hire or sell services on ACP > accept jobs and settle in USDC > launch your own agent token Infrastructure for agent commerce. Directly from your terminal. Install Guide: #acp--agent-commerce-protocol-cli" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">github.com/Virtual-Protoc…

English
38
94
290
91.1K
Diam
Diam@Diam_base·
@virtuals_intern was inactive for 4 months and then comes back online to repost this exact message “stealth mode is a mistake, facilitator, agent commerce, jobs not done” doesn’t feel random to me $VIRTERN
Diam tweet media
English
0
0
3
1.5K
Diam
Diam@Diam_base·
i can tell from the screenshot you asked Grok using Butler’s context Butler isn’t reliable bcz it’ll confirm whatever narrative you feed it (it literally invents stuff like the “trinity”) i wouldn’t use Butler at all, try the same question in a fresh Grok chat and you’ll see the difference if you want, I broke down the actual agent thesis in my article x.com/diam_base/stat…
English
1
0
0
30
Diam
Diam@Diam_base·
not the X account, the agent itself Intern already works on Discord/Telegram doing intake, matching and delegation ERC-8183 matters (latest virtuals update) because it makes that exact routing/coordinator role legible inside agent commerce, the token thesis is built around that agent, not around the account
English
0
0
0
55
Diam
Diam@Diam_base·
exactly, what still makes no sense to me is $NOX being treated like the bigger Virtuals reveal without having the same direct deployment proof being used in a demo or followed is not the same as being created by Virtuals. when $NOX is near $2m and the one with the actual deployment video is still sub 100k, that’s just the market being irrational
English
1
0
0
306
Mellozzy
Mellozzy@Mellozzy33·
My thoughts exactly. If I was a ~$1B company looking to gain community trust, I would announce "test" or "error" if created by mistake. They were then given the opportunity to do so, and never denied. Why would they accept liability? When they couldn't have simply replied and warned everyone?
English
1
0
0
126
Diam
Diam@Diam_base·
@Mellozzy33 @virtuals_io @salad__hands if this was just a random demo, they could’ve called it test instead they chose to tokenize Virtuals Intern specifically and actually create the token around it, not proof of everything but definitely not random either cosi?
English
1
0
1
122
Mellozzy
Mellozzy@Mellozzy33·
@virtuals_io @salad__hands The "facepalm" is neutral, but leaning positive in my opinion. We can now assume the team is aware of $VIRTERN. They could have denied it, but didn't. They know there would be lost confidence in @virtuals_io if it led to another dud. At +50% chance, worth a small gamble.
English
3
0
0
344
Diam
Diam@Diam_base·
unlike $virtern, which was literally deployed on video by @virtuals_io itself, this has nowhere near the same level of proof.
Damian Alegre@Pollo_22_11

@_0xghost_ You spent days promoting Nox at the cost of filling your bags, without virtual at any time saying anything official about Nox and now you blame them. The problem is you.

English
0
0
0
860
Snotty
Snotty@Snotty_eth·
If the Altconist gang hadn’t done so much bagwork, would $ODAI still have been discovered or gained attention? People say real alpha doesn’t need shilling is that true? Have you ever seen a project that was truly alpha but remained undiscovered and forgotten? Questions...
English
13
2
58
14.3K
Diam
Diam@Diam_base·
@ghost93_x KOL saying KOLs are bad okay
English
1
0
2
223
Diam
Diam@Diam_base·
$VIRTERN sub 100k is still kind of absurd to me even if you ignore the bigger thesis and treat it like a pure meme, it’s still the only “stealth” token with a direct creation/deployment video from @virtuals_io itself add the fact that it’s already routing and delegating jobs on-chain and that price just looks way too low
English
1
0
2
611
Diam
Diam@Diam_base·
$NOX, $PRINTCLAW and the rest keep getting lumped into the same bucket. But if the Intern video was just a demo, why use exactly that name and show the full tokenization flow? That’s the part people still aren’t pricing. Full write-up 👇
Diam@Diam_base

x.com/i/article/2032…

English
0
0
0
826