Meghan Jones

@LeighAn99881067 @irenebritusa All present tense. Not 5 months ago Candace sent a text questioning whether I murdered my husband. She said claiming. My point remains-she wasn’t referring to the text so when did Candace say those words that Erika is referring to?

@Emkayjay83 @irenebritusa She did not say she wakes up and sees claims by Candace. “I wake up to headlines, I have a comedian doing white face, I have people saying I’m not fit to be CEO, I have Candace Owens claiming I murdered my husband.” ALL separate things.

Erika would not have gone on camera and said that Candace claimed she murdered her husband without the go-ahead from her lawyers. Erika has a case for defamation, regardless of whether Candace ‘explicitly’ said it. Her defamatory statements have led her cult following to target Erika under the guise of ‘just asking questions’ and to assume she is “complicit” in her husband’s death. Most of the Candy cult wouldn't care about what Erika was doing or TPUSA if it weren't for Candace.

@brinakaz @JayTC53 We’ll see how your comment ages.

@Emkayjay83 @JayTC53 “Erika won” and that’s why you can’t even get on social media without seeing 100 posts with people making fun of her and her outfit. Let these morons jump up and down waiting for things that will never come. It won’t change the truth.

In one week, Candace Owens fled the country to meet with her Zionist handlers. Since then, her lawyer dropped her as client. Her 🏳️‍🌈 husband's hidden DUI gets dropped. President Trump blasts on truth social. Erika Kirk fired back at her & won. She picked up a new defamation lawsuit Not a good week for Candy Owens.

@ryanmauro If Candace viewers told you they could answer those questions and didn’t have those negative feelings would you believe them?

To all Candace Owens fans who are Christians: If we are to “know them by their fruits,” then which episode of her podcast affected you by… Strengthening your faith? Inspiring you to treat someone better than you normally would? To be charitable to the point that you actually had to sacrifice? To love someone when it’s hard to? To have more hope, joy and kindness? If you can’t answer that question and if her content consistently leaves you feeling resentful, paranoid, pessimistic or angry, then she and her “fruits” do not belong in your life.

@RavenGrace0613 Why would she spend her vacation and confirmation time talking about a lawsuit that hadn’t been filed? She knows there will be time to deal with that later. She knows how to walk away from work when it matters. It’s an important skill.

Candace knew about the lawsuit before she went to Rome. Yet she says she hadn’t had time to talk to her husband about it? So Candace Baby, they sent you the detailed information on why and that they were suing you the day you went to Rome but you are surprised by the suit when it dropped and haven’t had time to talk to Georgie about it? So no time on the plane or in Rome you and George discussed the lawsuit? Were you even together? If I received a detailed letter and notice a lawsuit was about to hit….it would be the main topic of conversation between my husband and I for days. Another lie of Candace, she always forgets what she says, and then has to spin it. One lie that gets another lie, which gets another lie going. She knew, George knew and their PR move now is to use George as the reason they will file up dismiss.

@Geoff777111 @tiredofstupid24 @TravDoesCrypto @tpusafaith @RealCandaceO @ErikaKirk I’m guessing this was the reply you accidentally sent the wrong person? Because as far as I can tell, you and I agree. These threads get a little out of control though so I know how easy it is to reply under the wrong comment. Been there, done that. Get some rest, take care.

I read all 69 pages of the filing, have you? Im not sure why were even here. I don't give a crap. I read it. It is painfully clear to me exactly what this lawsuit. Im glad to wait and see what happens because it is way bigger then this fake case. Seriously do you ever ask yourself, why the fhck am I so crazy about if some lady is mean to some other lady whose husband just died. You know what it is. You are the ladies that used to watch soap operas, this is what you do. BRAINWASHED THATS WHY YOU ACT CRAZY BECAUSE WE ARE FIGHTING TO GET OR FIND OUT WHAT HAPPENED You don't have to agree with us but can you not kinda grasp that its a lil bit weird that you're mad were finding out how Charlie was killed? No you don't but just chill out and stop being so controlling and mean. Who the fuck cares, what someone else says. If you don't like it, ignore it

You would think all the followers of the cult @tpusafaith and Christian Zionist types would ask themselves: Why would the president, Laura Loomer, TPUSA security, and others be attacking Candace? Why would Erika Kirk say Candace accused her of killing her husband, when I have not seen Candace say that one time? Why would people be suing her, smearing her, and trying to shut her down instead of simply answering basic questions? Candace Owens is a mother of four trying to find out who killed Charlie Kirk, who she loved as a friend. She is not calling for violence. She is not telling people to hurt anyone. She is asking questions because the story does not add up. And from what I’ve seen, even ChatGPT will acknowledge this much: there are still strange gaps, unanswered questions, and parts of the public story that do not feel fully settled. That does not mean we know who did it. It means people are allowed to ask why the evidence, the timeline, and the reactions from powerful people feel so off. So why are the people who should care most about truth attacking the person asking questions? Why are they not demanding transparency? Why are they not saying, “If Candace is wrong, prove it clearly”? That is the part people should be using their brains on. A woman is trying to find out what really happened to her friend, and instead of helping her, powerful people are attacking her, suing her, and lying about what she said. That is strange. And I think the reason so many people cannot see it is because people have been psychologically altered. Brainwashed. Trained to react emotionally instead of think logically. I do not even say that to insult them. I think it has been done to people on purpose. Because this is not complicated. If you have any deductive reasoning left, any common sense left, you should at least be asking: Why are they so afraid of questions? @RealCandaceO @TuckerCarlson @IanCarrollShow

@Geoff777111 @tiredofstupid24 @TravDoesCrypto @tpusafaith @RealCandaceO @ErikaKirk I appreciate your comment. I’m a firm believer, and a fallible human. Love is the greatest commandment, but I don’t believe we must sacrifice holding others accountable or turn a blind eye to lies simply because exposing truth is painful or asking questions is uncomfortable.

Im no expert, but I listen to the so called experts all the way to the crackpots. You find the truth but takes work, truth and discernment. I mean real discernment and that's hard right now, you’re gonna be tricked or fail. I think we have to all be better people. And we need to listen to Jesus. Jesus. Not a church or a man. Any hippie, new age thinker, empath, open, creative. If you haven't read the words of Jesus. Go in thinking he was just a man. I guarantee you , you will agree. Love real love is Jesus. Im not a preacher but I feel it. Anyway just my thoughts sorry gotta shut up sometimes

@LeighAn99881067 @irenebritusa Even IF we ignore the context of that text message-it’s not defamation because it’s a question, not an allegation. It also wasn’t sent to or asked of Erika, which implies it’s not what Erika was referring to since she said she wakes up and sees claims by Candace (present tense).

@irenebritusa But she did claim it. She implies it daily, but specifically typed it in this text.

@nosoup4knowles She didn’t lie about the DUI, but even if he had a DUI it would never be more important than finding out who really killed Charlie Kirk.

Candace fans, if it turns out that Candace is lying about her husband's DUI, will you still trust her regarding other matters?

@tiredofstupid24 @Geoff777111 @tpusafaith @RealCandaceO @ErikaKirk Courts do not equate implying with accusing in matters of opinion. Name one defamation case that was won based solely on implications.

@Emkayjay83 @Geoff777111 @tpusafaith @RealCandaceO @ErikaKirk They are examples of her implying it, which if you had basic reading comprehension skills you would know because I said that in a previous post. Implying = accusing. Courts equate them to each other. Defamation has been won based solely on implications.

@tiredofstupid24 @TravDoesCrypto @Geoff777111 @tpusafaith @RealCandaceO @ErikaKirk The AI comment was to someone else, honey. Research how twitter works. I’ll go head to head with you any day on defamation law or the general provisions governing discovery and school you.

@Emkayjay83 @TravDoesCrypto @Geoff777111 @tpusafaith @RealCandaceO @ErikaKirk I have done a lot of research on this, I don’t need AI. Looks like you may want to do some research honey. You are not very intelligent.

@tiredofstupid24 @Geoff777111 @TravDoesCrypto @tpusafaith @RealCandaceO @ErikaKirk Brian has way more to lose than CO in discovery. Plus anyone he named in the lawsuit (law enforcement, TPUSA staff, security staff, podcasters) are eligible for subpoena and deposition now too. She can also request video evidence of the first aid given to Charlie. He messed up.

@Geoff777111 @Emkayjay83 @TravDoesCrypto @tpusafaith @RealCandaceO @ErikaKirk Here is an objective lawyer. Learn something from someone not making money off the Kirk murder.

@tiredofstupid24 @Geoff777111 @TravDoesCrypto @tpusafaith @RealCandaceO @ErikaKirk The lawyer called Candace an entertainer and included text messages in the lawsuit that directly undermine major claims of the lawsuit itself-and that’s just the beginning of the missteps. Top notch, for sure.

@Geoff777111 @Emkayjay83 @TravDoesCrypto @tpusafaith @RealCandaceO @ErikaKirk The lawyer he hired is top notch from a highly respected law firm. They are not the type of firm to take a case that does not have legs and a strong chance of winning. Anything less is way below the Dhillon firm. Only Coleman would take on a case based on lies.

@tiredofstupid24 @Geoff777111 @TravDoesCrypto @tpusafaith @RealCandaceO @ErikaKirk The way you guys overuse grifter every chance you get is really changing the meaning of that word. It’s like calling someone a Nazi now. It just doesn’t hit like it used to.

@Geoff777111 @Emkayjay83 @TravDoesCrypto @tpusafaith @RealCandaceO @ErikaKirk Just because Baron is a lawyer doesn’t mean he’s being earnest. He is debunked all the time. He’s a grifter and con artist.

@JayTC53 She hasn’t done Friday podcasts in a long time. That day is reserved for her book club (usually twice a month) but not her regular show. Nice try, loser.

Candace Owens has cancelled her show today after being hit with defamation lawsuit. Thousands of people were waiting for her to speak and she abandoned her commitments. Candace is giving weird vibes as many of her fans aren't buying her official narrative. Is she meeting with her Zionist handlers again?

@JayTC53 @grok @CommunityNotes You’re begging Grok to let you be a liar. That’s so pathetic.

@grok @CommunityNotes It falls into the it's an opinionated community note and it should still be taken down

@Christina384966 @dontkillmeforit @NJBeisner So he wanted his literal wife and life partner to take over his position in the event he met an early death? Knowing the threats he faced b/c of it and the time away from home the job required? Sure, that’s believable.

@dontkillmeforit @NJBeisner Maybe because it was a private meeting and its also not your business? Charlie thought the world of her so not sure why its so hard for you to believe. Its his literal wife, his life partner.

Candace keeps referencing TPUSA donors who were at the Aspen retreat who tell her Charlie never said anything there about appointing his wife. Why do these alleged donors need to remain anonymous? We’re talking about high-level donors, so clearly they have means and resources. They’re also accusing TPUSA of lying, so clearly they don’t care if their names being outed burns bridges with TPUSA. So tell me why neither they nor she will reveal their names. Just like yesterday when she claimed Mikey told someone else (unnamed) to tell Candace to look into Andrew. Why is everyone always unnamed? Even when there’s no perceived threat? Why does she never have any evidence and never provide any way for us to fact check her claims?

@NJBeisner It’s quite common for journalists to not reveal sources and there are laws protecting their right to do so. If she outed everyone, no one would share information with her. Information can be verified without knowing a source. TPUSA could share the video, for instance.

@SLancasterX So she moved her family to Tennessee just so in the future she could slander and defame people because a law there allows her to file an early petition to dismiss “meritless speech based lawsuits?” You’re an idiot.

This is why the most vile “Person of the Year” moved to Tennessee. This is why she shifted her business from Delaware to Tennessee after the Macrons filed suit. An individual doesn’t make a move like this without a sense of guilt. She knows she’s in the wrong and is attempting to take advantage of the system. #CandaceOwens #scum

@bertha_b83724 @WildManZig @TheMissyLerch As far as the lies on the show, he lied about the drone usage that day. He said he couldn’t legally fly drones, yet TPUSA had drones up shooting footage. He was misleading in his statements about conversations with local law enforcement.

@WildManZig @TheMissyLerch What did he lie about?

I read through the lawsuit against Candace Owens and Mitchell Snow brought by Brian Harpole. The similarities to the defamation case against Karen Read and Turtleboy are uncanny. I mean, it felt like I was reading the same lawsuit. “Owen’s describes herself as as an “investigative journalist” “Owen’s regularly used her podcast and X account to promote conspiracy theories” “These platforms are monetized. The more followers she has the more views her content received, the more money she makes” “She is not subject to any oversight or professional ethics” Owen’s attempted to contact Harpole to “explain his side”. She used his silence to further her viewership and defamation against him. Same components: 1) Defamation 2) Conspiracy 3) Aiding and Abetting The lawsuit addresses public vs. private individuals as well. “He did not seek publicity” “His participation in the controversy was limited to defending statements made against him.” “Two podcast appearances” And, similarly, Candace Owens, is saying she is glad she is being sued because, you guessed it, the discovery phase🤣🤣🤣🤣

@bertha_b83724 @WildManZig @TheMissyLerch His claim was his appearance on that show was solely to defend himself against false claims she made. The show was before she ever talked about him on her show. Plus, early on she was defending him, not questioning him. She showed text messages to prove that.