Engine Miller

21.2K posts

Engine Miller

Engine Miller

@EngineMiller

Lived across the US, Europe & Caribbean. Experience in military, government, legal, engineering, organizational consulting. Student of history. Redeemed.

CA to TX Coast for the culture Entrou em Haziran 2021
1.2K Seguindo1.3K Seguidores
Tweet fixado
Engine Miller
Engine Miller@EngineMiller·
And I set my mind to know wisdom and to know madness and folly; I realized that this also is striving after wind. • Because in much wisdom there is much grief, and increasing knowledge results in increasing pain. King Solomon, Ecclesiastes 1:17-18
English
3
4
51
3.9K
Matt Van Swol
Matt Van Swol@mattvanswol·
I have actively tried to get my liberal friends on X. They will not do it. They read one thing they find offensive and leave X instead of challenging the argument to a public debate. The Left is absolutely certain they are right. While having zero interest in proving it...
English
545
277
3.1K
36.4K
Engine Miller retweetou
Wide Awake Media
Wide Awake Media@wideawake_media·
Dr. Ben Carson insists we must not allow the lies of the Covid era to be "swept under the rug". "Dr. Fauci... [eventually admitted] that there was no science behind any of what he was saying." "We know that the side effects from Covid vaccinations far exceeded anything else in the last 30 years combined." "It's important for us to lend our voices to that—not to just let it be swept under the rug." Credit: @RealBenCarson @ChildrensHD
English
150
4K
10.8K
73.5K
Engine Miller retweetou
LindellTV
LindellTV@RealLindellTV·
🚨 FINCHEM: “THERE IS EVIDENCE - THEY KEPT IT OUT OF COURT.” Sen. @RealMarkFinchem pushed back on repeated claims of “no evidence” of election wrongdoing: “That is pure gaslighting.” He argues many cases were never fully heard: “You did everything possible to keep these cases out of court so the evidence couldn’t be presented.” Finchem also pointed to concerns around voting systems, citing past demonstrations showing potential vulnerabilities. His broader warning: “The ‘no evidence’ narrative is propaganda.”
English
5
241
525
6.4K
Engine Miller
Engine Miller@EngineMiller·
@peterboghossian No. They want investigations of "suspected wrongdoers"- FOR A CHANGE, full protection of their rights, and when proven criminal, THEN vigilante justice for them. Pay attention, get it right.
English
0
0
0
1
Peter Boghossian
Peter Boghossian@peterboghossian·
Much of rightwing X is demanding vigilante justice for suspected wrongdoers and suspension of habeas corpus and Miranda rights. It's as if they learned absolutely nothing from far left lunatics who made people's lives hell for the last decade by broadly attempting exactly that.
English
175
28
366
16.5K
Engine Miller retweetou
Kevin Carpenter
Kevin Carpenter@kejca·
Charlie Munger: "If you're a pure socialist, you're a nutcase. An absolute nutcase. And not a modest nutcase — a real nutcase." "You can be a perfect nut with a high IQ." "If we want a productive society, we can't help but have these personal incentives to handle your own affairs — and if you do that, you get unequal wealth outcomes. The price of plenty is that you can't have socialism."
English
21
208
1.4K
94.7K
Engine Miller
Engine Miller@EngineMiller·
The London-dominated insurance industry. If they assume the risk of one explosive laiden speedboat or drone hitting one ship is too high they cancel coverage for all. Then all stop transiting. It’s not about numbers of missiles or drones… politics.
John Fuller 1704@Fuller1704

@CreasonJana @TheEXECUTlONER_ What nobody seems able to explain: HOW does Iran “close the Strait”? If they have no ships, and no planes, and their missiles are ”knocked out”; how exactly do they prevent passage?

English
0
0
0
8
Engine Miller
Engine Miller@EngineMiller·
Simpatico- both in bio and observation and opinion. I’m not sure I didn’t write this…
Eric S. Raymond@esrtweet

Hello, Europeans. The first thing you need to understand about the rant I'm about to utter is that I'm not MAGA, not a Trumpite, but a libertarian who has in the past nevertheless been strongly supportive of US military presence overseas. Because I want the wars that defend this country to be fought in somebody else's country, as far away from me as possible with a nice big ocean in the way. Also relevant: I have a history of having lived in Europe and traveled there extensively. I was at one time bilingual in English and Spanish, and have been passably fluent in Italian and French as well. I could probably still find my way around London and Rome and central Paris reasonably well. So if you're tempted to tell yourselves that I'm some kind of parochial American hick, abandon that hope. All that was set-up. So that, when I tell you that almost the entirety of the US electorate, not just Trump supporters, is increasingly fed up with your shit, take me seriously. We've been cleaning up your messes and keeping the sea lanes open since 1917. And that was for you, not us - we, being very close to resource self-sufficient, don't need that investment so much. We've spent enormous amounts of blood and treasure on keeping you safe. We risked nuclear hellfire on our own cities for nearly 50 years to keep Soviet tanks from rolling through the Fulda Gap. Even since the Cold War ended, we've subsidized your socialist-playpen welfare states and disastrous immigration policies by taking the need to maintain militaries more effective than a sack of wet farts off the table. Now we've come looking for help keeping a bunch of rabid Islamic fanatics from getting nuclear weapons that are a clear and present danger to all of you even more than they are to us, and what do we hear? "Waah! It's another Republican president we don't like, just like the last half dozen of them! So we're going to sulk in a corner, except when we're biting at your ankles with crap like airspace restrictions." No. No, we're not going to take this anymore. It's not just conservatives who have had enough, it's moderates and people who used to be strong supporters of liberal internationalism. Our citizen's willingness to pay higher taxes to protect you was upward-bounded by your gratitude. Now that we know your gratitude has effectively gone to zero, so does our willingness. Don't expect this to change if the Democrats take power here. They are much less liberal-internationalist than Republicans now. While they might make mouth noises that soothe you, their overriding concern is the gaping, insatiable maw of their income transfer programs. They'll sacrifice subsidizing Europe's playpen socialism to feed their domestic version in a heartbeat. And there is no longer any significant Democratic constituency to argue against that. In truth, three decades after the Cold War ended there is no American constituency at all for the massive subsidies you get. It frankly surprises me they lasted this long, that we were this patient with your cowardice and your bitchy whining. This moment has been a long time coming. It's not Donald Trump sinking the transatlantic alliance, it is absolutely you.

English
0
0
0
20
Engine Miller
Engine Miller@EngineMiller·
@NotHeImHim @charliesmirkley As in anything, it’s not the race/color… it’s the culture. If you just do large cities (dominated North and South by Democrat governance) it’s STILL the culture and not race.
English
0
0
0
14
Tony
Tony@NotHeImHim·
@charliesmirkley After adjusting for demographics which are unfortunately far worse in red states (black population wise) it looks even worse for democrats
English
4
1
138
4.2K
Charlie Smirkley
Charlie Smirkley@charliesmirkley·
🔴 Red states spend $14.0k per pupil. 🔵 Blue states spend $21.2k. NAEP composite (math + reading 4 and 8): 🔴 244.9 🔵 245.3 Correlations w/ NAEP composite across 50 states and DC. Raw spend: r = +0.07 and Income-adjusted: r = −0.14.
Charlie Smirkley tweet media
English
53
222
1.2K
895.1K
Engine Miller
Engine Miller@EngineMiller·
@1Cor1613 @AriFleischer And what DO you expect if we are not allowed to operate from our bases in our own interests? You are hearing what the American people expect…
English
0
0
0
8
Aaron
Aaron@1Cor1613·
@EngineMiller @AriFleischer Please, you aren't here just for our protection. The US doesn't do anything that isn't in its own interest.
English
1
0
0
36
Ari Fleischer
Ari Fleischer@AriFleischer·
When this is over, the western part of NATO will never be the same. Spain, England, France and Italy have sold us out, as they too often have a history of doing. Eastern European nations are the heart of NATO. They spend money on defense, know how to fight and love the US. France particularly deserves fault and blame. From supporting China and Russia at the UN to denying Americans overflight rights, they’re doing what they’ve always done - showing weakness, while cutting deals with terrorists. (The reason the US has a Marine Corps and Navy is unlike France, we refused to pay a ransom to the Barbary Pirates. France is always happy to cut a deal.) Wars have unintended consequences as nations show their true colors. NATO will never be the same, and Western European weakness and acquiescence is the cause.
English
11.4K
7.1K
37.1K
7.7M
Engine Miller
Engine Miller@EngineMiller·
@BarnetBandit @AriFleischer The ire is not so much that they didn’t step up with troops or weapons. But they prevented us from overflight and use of the very runways we base and stage at IN OUR PROTECTION OF THEM. Unforgivable.
English
0
0
1
17
Barnet Bandit
Barnet Bandit@BarnetBandit·
@AriFleischer Western NATO didn't "sell out" the US NATO is strictly a defensive alliance, hence why the UK sent our boys to die in Afghanistan when YOU invoked Article 5 There is absolutely no backing to do so for an offensive war Article 5 is clear.
Barnet Bandit tweet media
English
2
1
5
4.7K
Engine Miller
Engine Miller@EngineMiller·
@rlucia @AriFleischer The ire is not so much that they didn’t step up with troops or weapons. But they prevented us from overflight and use of the very runways we base and stage at IN OUR PROTECTION OF THEM. Unforgivable.
English
0
0
2
17
Rocco Lucia
Rocco Lucia@rlucia·
NATO is not a US puppet force. US decided in its own (?) interest to start a war against Iran. US didn’t even bother to alert NATO allies. US didn’t even bother to appeal to UN for alleged Iran wrongdoing. Which NATO article are NATO members not respecting to trigger US liver reaction? It is simply FAFO time.
English
67
0
12
7.9K
Engine Miller
Engine Miller@EngineMiller·
@_HenryBolton @AriFleischer The ire is not so much that they didn’t step up with troops or weapons. But they prevented us from overflight and use of the very runways we base and stage at IN OUR PROTECTION OF THEM. Unforgivable.
English
0
0
0
28
Henry Bolton OBE 🇬🇧
Henry Bolton OBE 🇬🇧@_HenryBolton·
People like @AriFleischer are either immensely stupid, appallingly badly informed or incredibly dishonest. 1) Anyone can read the North Atlantic Charter (NATO Treaty) - just google it - and see for themselves that NATO cannot be mobilised for this war. 2) When has the UK sold the United States out? Never. The US has sold us out though, a few times. 3) UK bases are being used daily for strikes on Iran. 4) If you wanted allied support in this war, perhaps it would have been wise to a) asked them b) involve them in the planning for it, rather than just start a war on your own and then demand we get involved. Ari, you are doing the American people no favours by misleading them.
English
112
185
1.8K
96.3K
Engine Miller
Engine Miller@EngineMiller·
@1Cor1613 @AriFleischer The ire is not so much that they didn’t step up with troops or weapons. But they prevented us from overflight and use of the very runways we base and stage at IN OUR PROTECTION OF THEM. Unforgivable.
English
1
0
1
41
Aaron
Aaron@1Cor1613·
When this administration is over, normal Americans will realise just how badly you have F’d up. We have been incredibly consistent allies. It’s you that has treated us like dirt. In the Falklands, you gave us aviation fuel, Sidewinders, and intel. We lost hundreds of men. Our sovereign territory was invaded. We where thankful for the support you did give us. The UK has done far more for you in this war than you did for us then. We will not be held accountable for this abomination of an administration. This is the biggest loss of American influence the world has ever seen and that saddens me greatly.
English
261
22
612
43.6K
Engine Miller
Engine Miller@EngineMiller·
@LFried76 @AriFleischer The ire is not so much that they didn’t step up with troops or weapons. But they prevented us from overflight and use of the very runways we base and stage at IN OUR PROTECTION OF THEM. Unforgivable.
English
0
0
5
52
Lennie Friedman
Lennie Friedman@LFried76·
Ari- Respectfully, unlike Bush, Trump did nothing to build support and make a case to our allies. He acted on his own, and then when it wasn’t a cake walk - he then asked others to help fix a problem he created. In addition he’s spent the past 10 years denigrating them. I’m not anti-this war in theory, I would like to see regime change in Iran. And I wish the president made the case to get our allies on board. But he did nothing of the sort, and has treated our allies like enemies. It should surprise no one that they are less than eager to run to our aid in a war we started. NATO was formed to support countries when attacked. Not when they go to war of choice. We should have gotten them on board to start. They have no incentive to help the US.
English
77
43
797
39.4K
Stephen McIntyre
Stephen McIntyre@ClimateAudit·
@AriFleischer Eastern European nations were the epicenter of Nazi collaboration and occupation in World War II. What does it say when they, together with USA, are now the "heart of NATO".
English
51
7
73
6.2K
Engine Miller
Engine Miller@EngineMiller·
Thanks for the insight Ship. The retired leadership and org consultant in me agrees with your conclusion and why it was designed in. Org design is the leadership that keeps on leading, after transfers, hires and retirements. That’s why I know nothing will be permanently changed without a change in personnel BUT ALSO some redesign of structure and process that supplies the incentives and identifies and applies consequences. Before investigations are required… resort to management and leadership before legal process. That appears lost at DOJ and FBI.
English
0
0
0
621
Shipwreckedcrew
Shipwreckedcrew@shipwreckedcrew·
The Associate Attorney General (AAG), the No. 3 position in DOJ, is the hardest job in the Department. Here is why. The AAG and Dep. Attorney General (DAG) have similar jobs in the two different branches of the Org Chart under the Attorney General, but the AAG does report to the DAG, hence No. 2 v. No. 3. The DAG has direct supervision over: U.S. Attorneys (Criminal) Criminal Division, National Security Division, FBI, DEA, USMS, ATF, etc., BOP, Immigration, and a variety of lesser offices. The AAG has direct supervision over: U.S. Attorneys (Civil), Civil Division, Tax Division, Anti-Trust Division, Civil Rights Division, Environment and Natural Resources Division, U.S. Trustees (Bankruptcy), Office of Information Policy (FOIA), and about 6-8 lesser offices. Under the AAG there are 6 Senate Confirmed Assistant Attorneys General. They tend to have a level of subject-matter expertise -- legal backgrounds in Tax, Civil Rights, Anti-trust, Environmental Law, or Civil Litigation as the case may be. All civil appellate work below the Supreme Court -- where the Dept. is winning huge victories -- is in the Civil Division, Appellate Section. The Associate AG will never have subject matter expertise in all 6 -- so he/she is always at a disadvantage in having high-level discussions with those 6 Assis. AGs on the subject matters where they are experts based on their careers in those fields -- that's why they were picked. The result is that all 6 are generally after the AAG's job, and have a motivation to undermine the AAG up the chain. It is a thankless position where there is little public glory in victories, but much criticism comes along when things go badly.
English
14
81
453
23.3K