๐ŸŒ…๐ŸŒ„๐Ÿž๏ธ๐Ÿ›ฃ๏ธ๐ŸŒ†๐ŸŒŒ๐ŸŒ‰๐ŸŽ‘

6.1K posts

๐ŸŒ…๐ŸŒ„๐Ÿž๏ธ๐Ÿ›ฃ๏ธ๐ŸŒ†๐ŸŒŒ๐ŸŒ‰๐ŸŽ‘ banner
๐ŸŒ…๐ŸŒ„๐Ÿž๏ธ๐Ÿ›ฃ๏ธ๐ŸŒ†๐ŸŒŒ๐ŸŒ‰๐ŸŽ‘

๐ŸŒ…๐ŸŒ„๐Ÿž๏ธ๐Ÿ›ฃ๏ธ๐ŸŒ†๐ŸŒŒ๐ŸŒ‰๐ŸŽ‘

@FictionDefender

no dni, objects does not have human rights, fuck the west opinion on Asia media, limited English, i don't post alot cuz i care more irl than your delusions

๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡พ Entrou em Ekim 2023
187 Seguindo175 Seguidores
dreadseed
dreadseed@dreadseed218ยท
@realNikandros To most people lolicon media is basically a form of CP. By that logic those who readily consume and defend it are pedos/freaks That isnโ€™t watering down the word pedo, in fact some governments already identify lolicon as child SA material. Try googling lolicon this might come up
dreadseed tweet media
English
11
0
26
1.1K
Nikandros
Nikandros@realNikandrosยท
The pedophiles bundled together to brigade and community note my thread asserting it claims that it is NECESSARY to use CSAM to draw small anime girls, when it doesn't say that. Ever. This is a total strawman, which is expected of lolicon retards. If you say they're attracted to children and call them pedophiles (which they are, it's literally what a lolicon means in Japanese), they will claim you're calling them predators and demand evidence of them preying on a child. This kind of strawmanning and elevation of claims is the cornerstone of the lolicon persecution complex. If you make a thread talking about how artists use references and that if you're looking at lolicon art, you have no guarantee the artist did not use images of real children or even CSAM as reference to produce it, they will claim (as you can see in the community note) that "CSAM is NECESSARY to draw small anime girls". The only thing that is asserted is that all lolicon art is based on what real children look like, which is undeniably true. Loli characters don't look like old grandmothers or adult women. Despite being stylized, they heavily emphasize childlike features. This isn't the same as claiming all lolicon art uses photographs of real children as reference or traces photographs of real children. The whole point is that if you're willing to draw a line at Shadman draw explicit images of real children, you should reasonably be skeptical about what material the other lolicon art you look at is based on. As is stated at the end, it could even be CSAM passed through an AI filter. "But it literally never happens!" I already mention the example of Shadman in the OP, but that seemed to fly over people's heads, but there are other examples: x.com/realNikandros/โ€ฆ I've already pointed to an example of Dorontabi, the artist responsible for the "uoooh ๐Ÿ˜ญ๐Ÿ’ข correction" memes that he publicly talked about hoarding Japanese child gravure photos. x.com/P33P00peepee/sโ€ฆ Other commenters brought up other examples like the author of Vampeerz clearly using a photo of a real child on their work. What is the number of examples I need to pull up before you accept that there is a non-zero risk that the artist behind the lolicon images you enjoy might be using real children as reference? It doesn't matter what the artist says, because they have every incentive to lie. Just like lolicons have every incentive to lie and boldly strawman me, because they know exactly what they are and refuse to accept it.
Nikandros tweet media
Nikandros@realNikandros

"It's fictional content!" "No real children are being harmed!" Contrary to popular belief, artists don't conjure images from a void in their imagination. It's actually impossible to think up a totally original, unique idea that isn't derived from something that already exists. What reference material do you think loli artists use for anatomy, pose, proportions etc? Just because anime or cartoons are stylized doesn't mean that they're entirely detached from real human anatomy. The reason why predators keep getting caught with this stuff is because these drawings are depicting child anatomy in a manner that pedophiles find arousing. The other people looking at it aren't necessarily going to molest a real child, but they still have a pedophilic attraction. What I find fascinating is how many l*licons are willing to condemn Shadman for drawing explicit art of real children or child actresses, while tolerating drawings that "are not based on real children". Bro, they all are. The only difference is the extent to which it looks like a specific child. If it looks like one kid it's not okay, but if the drawing is based on pictures of 10 kids it's fine? How does this work? Do you think someone like Chibireviews is evaluating what material the artist use as reference when drawing the pictures in his special folder? If all you have is the final product, you really can't, unless you're already familiar with the source material. For all he knows, the artist might've used CSAM as reference. You think the artist is going to say that publicly? It could also be CSAM passed through an AI filter. As AI models get better that's only going to become less noticeable and more likely to happen. Vaush already had a bunch of AI images in his tax folder that he didn't notice were AI.

English
55
71
611
29.2K
Czarson
Czarson@Czarson_crยท
you all constatnly tell us to kill ourselves, dox us, attack us, try to deplatform us, wish we get raped, killed, wish our kids get raped, yet you try to stand on this moral highground. The person who posted this was a minor, a 15 year old, a literal kid, what he did was wrong, but you instantly go to wish death upon a minor. Schlep attacked innocent people who like drawings, then started crashing out when he got pushback. Reset the clock exist for a reason.
Race Driver: GRID@TouchieyRebirth

This is genuine evil man

English
50
105
1.3K
33.1K
๐ŸŒ…๐ŸŒ„๐Ÿž๏ธ๐Ÿ›ฃ๏ธ๐ŸŒ†๐ŸŒŒ๐ŸŒ‰๐ŸŽ‘ retweetou
Emerald Apple
Emerald Apple@AI_EmeraldAppleยท
The downfall of Schlep should be studied, and so I studied it. Schlep is a popular content creator who has been exposing pedophiles in a popular game called Roblox. His actions led to the arrest of 6 individuals, with 5 of them charged, and 3 of them pled guilty. On March 31st 2026, Parlo drops a Google Doc alleging that his voice actor, AceTheNarrator, solicited nudes/CSAM from actual minors as young as 11. Schlep was warned about this fact back in Aug 2025, but kept working with him for videos, and stayed mutuals on Discord and X. Schlep downplayed the allegations, saying that it's "4th hand info" or that it was just "minor on minor" stuff. He then posts a strong denial, saying that Parlo is a malicious actor who is being used themselves and has retracted prior incorrect statements. Schep has promised a point-by-point rebuttal of Parlo's allegations but has not delivered it. He then pivots hard back to Roblox and starts attacking the anime/loli community. On April 2nd, AceTheNarrator nukes his entire social media account. Schlep built his brand and content identity on catching real predators on Roblox, but after he was banned from Roblox for allegedly using harmful tactics to 'catch' predators, he then started shifting to policing fictional content, such as fictional anime/loli content. Schlep thought attacking โ€œloliconsโ€ would be easy... a low-hanging fruit. But in doing so, he angered the Japanese community, the broader anime community, and even the community that genuinely wants predators brought to justice. By painting a strawman equating lolicon with simple pedophilia, he conflates fiction with realityโ€ฆ lines on a paper vs actual human victims. The main friction many are pointing to is that he ignored the real predator within his circle while attacking drawings and 'cartoons'. Instead of explaining anything, Schelp has repeatedly denied everything without any receipts... no chat logs, no cutoff proof, no time stamps to prove that these allegations are false. This is the hypocrisy and selective enforcement that many are pointing to. While standing on the moral high ground, he uses the anime/loli controversy to deflect from his own drama surrounding AceTheNarrator, where he deliberately ignored warnings and kept the association anyway.
Emerald Apple tweet media
English
44
206
1.4K
28.8K
๐ŸŒ…๐ŸŒ„๐Ÿž๏ธ๐Ÿ›ฃ๏ธ๐ŸŒ†๐ŸŒŒ๐ŸŒ‰๐ŸŽ‘ retweetou
๐Ÿ…
๐Ÿ…@ks3654ยท
they don't tell you this, but being a pervert actually can improve your art skills exponentially
English
73
4.2K
34.3K
347.2K
๐ŸŒ…๐ŸŒ„๐Ÿž๏ธ๐Ÿ›ฃ๏ธ๐ŸŒ†๐ŸŒŒ๐ŸŒ‰๐ŸŽ‘ retweetou
Vanessa Guerrero
Vanessa Guerrero@nessguerreroยท
Thereโ€™s a genre of person on the internet that canโ€™t accept that something isnโ€™t for them so they have to create some kind of moral reason for not liking something.
English
121
9.8K
51.9K
700.8K
๐ŸŒ…๐ŸŒ„๐Ÿž๏ธ๐Ÿ›ฃ๏ธ๐ŸŒ†๐ŸŒŒ๐ŸŒ‰๐ŸŽ‘ retweetou
Emerald Apple
Emerald Apple@AI_EmeraldAppleยท
Against the advice of some people, I'm going to defend Chibi Reviews. The attack on lolicon content has nothing to do with protecting children. Itโ€™s a textbook case of โ€œcommon wisdomโ€ moral panic that will lead to a slippery slope of eroded privacy, mass censorship, and mass surveillance. First of all... Lolicon is not always sexual. In Japanese manga/anime, it is just an aesthetic preference for cute, petite, and youthful-looking characters, but many Western discourses flatten it into pedophilia. Actual sexual loli content is a minority/niche within the overall Japanese mainstream media. Criminalizing fictional content leads to an undue burden on law enforcement. It is the clearest case in the UK where REAL CSAM prosecutions fell by 60% according to a "Drawing the Line Watchlist 2025" survey... Meanwhile, prosecutions of fictional CSAM content is 40% of all image-related offences. This is occurring in the context where REAL CSAM is exploding online, with a massive increase in real children and young teens being victimized. Similar policies in Australia, the US, and Canada are causing real issues in distracting law enforcement from helping real victims. Another incentive for ignoring REAL CSAM is that it is enjoyed by too many ethnic minorities, such as the Pakistanis in the UK grooming scandal, and the authorities don't want to be seen as "racist" REAL victims of SA and abuse are massive... Over 650 million female and 410 million male victims are around the world, concentrated in locations such as MENA, and SEA countries, where laws are permissive for the exploitation of minors. Criminalization of fictional content distracts from this, as tens of millions of new victims are victimized systematically in the most vile manner imaginable. The widespread belief that lolicon is a โ€œgateway drugโ€ to real pedophilia and SV is treated as obvious "common wisdom", but the opposite is likely true. Japan is the global epicenter of legal lolicon content, with decades of permissive adult porn. Japan has one of the lowest reported per-capita rates of rape and penetrative child SA among developed nations... 2.2 cases per 100k in Japan vs over 20 cases per 100k in the USA.textbook The most vocal anti-lolicon crusaders are often later linked to real possession or distribution of REAL CSAM! This is the textbook definition of "reaction formation," a defensive mechanism in which someone overcompensates by aggressively opposing the material that causes their urges... also known as "projection." The worst part about it is that this creates a system of censorship, erosion of privacy, and destruction of free expression that doesn't stop at lolicon, but metastasizes to other issues, leading to authoritarian overreach. Then you get the usual suspects of mandatory age verification, algorithmic content scanning, platform risk assessments, and โ€œprohibited ideaโ€ definitions that naturally expand to other speech, data collection, and expression. The โ€œpedoโ€ smear that's been weaponized by antis, anti-porn feminists, as well as religious conservatives, accelerates it. They label any resistance to banning content as โ€œdefending predators,โ€ and the public tolerates more surveillance... because you don't want to be called a PEDO, do you??? It chills expression and speech not just on lolicon content but on the debate of real issues, like the UK grooming scandal, Japanโ€™s low-rate evidence, or even criticism of the laws themselves. But just like being called a "racist" and "NAZI" is losing power... eventually the smear of "pedo" will as well, since like the former slurs, it's being applied too broadly in cases where it doesn't belong... and hopefully the criminalization of fiction ends while prosecution of ACTUAL predators improves. The real victims... the hundreds of millions in poor regions in MENA, SEA, and many other places, as well as the online grooming pipelines, are the ones getting screwed by this distraction.
Chibi Reviews@ChibiReviews

Fuck it, I'm making a Loli defense video today Already been canceled, had 100,000s of 1000s of death threats, and false accusations. I have nothing to lose and will not stop speaking up for freedom of expression within artwork

English
122
849
5.9K
147.4K
๐ŸŒ…๐ŸŒ„๐Ÿž๏ธ๐Ÿ›ฃ๏ธ๐ŸŒ†๐ŸŒŒ๐ŸŒ‰๐ŸŽ‘
@NodleCup @Draconianwrath_ @shiochammie @AngeloD72909137 @puuzletrick @NemoShinobi sorry dude, i got my source from actual japanese, not from epstein island x.com/NewManjiSlime/โ€ฆ
ๅ…‰ไธ‡ๆฐHikari(Baby Manji Slime)@NewManjiSlime

dic.pixiv.net/a/%E3%83%AD%E3โ€ฆ Pixiv meaning for Lolicon is the best answer I've seen but not having any english is a bit sad

English
1
0
2
29
๐ŸŒ…๐ŸŒ„๐Ÿž๏ธ๐Ÿ›ฃ๏ธ๐ŸŒ†๐ŸŒŒ๐ŸŒ‰๐ŸŽ‘ retweetou
ใŠใ‚‹ใใ‚Š
ใŠใ‚‹ใใ‚Š@allgreen76bยท
ใ‚ขใƒ‹ใƒกๅคงๅ›ฝใฎๆ—ฅๆœฌใฏๅ›ใ‚‰ใฎๅ›ฝใ‚ˆใ‚Š้ฅใ‹ใซๆ€ง็Šฏ็ฝชใ‚‚่ขซๅฎณๅ…็ซฅใ‚‚ๅฐ‘ใชใ„ใงใ™ใ€‚่‡ชๅˆ†้”ใฎๅŠชๅŠ›ไธ่ถณใ‚’่ฒฌไปป่ปขๅซใ›ใšใ€็จŽ้‡‘ใกใ‚ƒใ‚“ใจไฝฟใฃใฆๆ•™่‚ฒใ‚„่ญฆๅฏŸ็ต„็น”ใฎๅ……ๅฎŸใซๅŠ›ใ‚’ๅ…ฅใ‚Œใฆใใ ใ•ใ„ใญใ€‚ๅฝ“ใŸใ‚Šๅ‰ใงใ™ใŒใ€ๆฒปๅฎ‰ใŒๆ‚ชใ„็คพไผšใงใฏๅญไพ›ใ‚„ๅฅณๆ€งใŒ็œŸใฃๅ…ˆใซ่ขซๅฎณใซ้ญใ„ใพใ™ใ—ใ€ใใ‚Œใฏๅ‰ตไฝœ็‰ฉใฎใ›ใ„ใงใฏใชใ„ใ€‚ ๅฅ้—˜ใ‚’็ฅˆใ‚Šใพใ™ใ€‚
Schlep@RealSchlep

Lolicon is pedophilia. If you gratify yourself to sexualized images of animated children youโ€™re a predator the fact X allows a community of these people to thrive on here is very shocking. Do better @Safety

ๆ—ฅๆœฌ่ชž
198
2.6K
16.9K
2M