Marc Thatcher

4K posts

Marc Thatcher banner
Marc Thatcher

Marc Thatcher

@MarcThatcher

'And you may ask yourself: well, how did I get here?'

Entrou em Mayıs 2013
166 Seguindo82 Seguidores
SKG
SKG@sonukg4india·
SKG tweet media
ZXX
10
26
390
30.3K
Dario Perkins
Dario Perkins@darioperkins·
For all my 1990 comparisons, I'd like to point out that I was just a kid back then. In fact, my mates and I collected the stickers. Hard to believe there was a sticker album accompanying a WAR..
Dario Perkins tweet media
English
10
2
46
8.7K
Tweet is the Work 🌷
Tweet is the Work 🌷@NoblestCalling·
Just saw a Ryan Gosling interview where he says he liked the story of Project Hail Mary because it has the message that the future isn't something to be feared, it's something to be figured out. And that's a message he wants his kids to hear. Awesome.
English
50
4.3K
62.1K
717.2K
Mathieu
Mathieu@miniapeur·
Mathieu tweet media
ZXX
37
291
3.7K
56.4K
Wojciech Aleksander Wołoszyn
Tiny moves like this are actually unlikely to be event-driven. Meanwhile, I get your question. BTC reached ~$1k in 2013–14 when demand was coming from things like ransomware + early black markets. Relative to that regime, today’s pricing doesn’t look particularly irrational to me.
English
1
0
1
12
Wojciech Aleksander Wołoszyn
@KobeissiLetter Seems irrational? I was thinking about such possibility recently. Once you run the numbers you’ll see that Iran stopping mining won’t affect the network in any meaningful way. So either I am missing other contexts or it’s simply a correlation or just irrational reaction?
English
1
0
0
353
S
S@_Financeguy·
@John_Stepek (That *gas* gas had at the margin) .. Rye House for example which is often constrained to run when demand peaks often charges more than £5,000/Mwh because it can. In the old days it was the same with Fawley and Grain.
English
2
0
1
38
Marc Thatcher
Marc Thatcher@MarcThatcher·
@worstall Is there any evidence that any major fossil fuel producing country is reducing its output because of the UK's example?
English
0
2
9
505
Tim Worstall
Tim Worstall@worstall·
Bob's idea. "However, the main reason for preventing further development in the North Sea is that it allows the UK to be more credible in arguing for other fossil fuel producers to leave their reserves in the ground." The beastly foreigners will be so in awe of us that they'll...
Bob Ward@ret_ward

My letter in today’s @FT on why the windfall tax on UK oil and gas should not be removed and why there should be no new development in the North Sea giftarticle.ft.com/giftarticle/ac…

English
10
5
57
3.7K
Marc Thatcher
Marc Thatcher@MarcThatcher·
@izakaminska @BaldingsWorld There are certain opinions that are acceptable in "polite" company. Those who wish to be in such company take on those opinions. They don't have to defend them as everyone else in their circle shares them
English
0
0
1
78
Izabella Kaminska
Izabella Kaminska@izakaminska·
Sitting with some finance types recently there was a discussion about tariffs and the logic for them. I explained the Miran perspective about how it’s all about needing to share the cost of supplying the dollar to the world, ideally by way of a more equitably distributed “exorbitant burden” tax. Also, to offset the effects of imbalances, which were hollowing out key industry and supply chains essential for guaranteeing national security. When that logic seemed to resonate, they appeared enlightened yet confounded. Their immediate response was “well why didn’t they communicate that in April?”. I said: “actually they did. In fact, Trump has been saying it’s all about national security and unfair asymmetric trade all along.” Their subsequent retort: “well they didn’t do it very well”. And that’s the interesting thing to consider. What’s really responsible for the communication breakdown and perception of chaos here? Is it a lack of clear messaging? (I, and many others, after all, managed to get the message 🤷‍♀️). Or is it some sort of psychological phenomenon? An automatic blocking or twisting of any message if it emanates from orange man or any member of orange man’s team? It’s a very interesting exercise in “you see what you want to see and nothing else”.
English
7
2
35
3.8K
Blume Industries CEO Balding 大老板
I literally had a conversation with someone here (TDS afflicted) where they complained Trump needed to do X. I informed them Trump literally did X what they said he should do. Like exactly. They proceeded to not miss a beat and say he wasn't doing it right
Enrico R Sobong@EnricoSobong

@BaldingsWorld I believe all policy issue positions for many people can be reduced to functions where one of the variables represents whether Orange Man is involved in any way. If true, this will result in potentially wildly different policy positions even for mundane issues.

English
10
10
117
12.3K
Bob From Accounts 🚲
Bob From Accounts 🚲@BobFromAccounts·
Hey drivers! Fun fact: these cyclists on their daily commute, who probably don't even own a car, pay as much towards the roads, the upkeep of roads, and the building of roads as drivers do. Just so we're clear
Bob From Accounts 🚲 tweet media
English
449
59
566
74.5K
MonitorX
MonitorX@MonitorX99800·
🇺🇸🇸🇦🇰🇼🇦🇪🇶🇦⚡️- Saudi Arabia, UAE, Kuwait, and Qatar are considering pulling out of contracts with the U.S. and canceling future investments in the US, to ease the economic pressure from the Iran war.
MonitorX tweet media
English
75
704
2.5K
141.7K
Taelin
Taelin@VictorTaelin·
just thinking out loud about all the hard things I still need to do before launching Bend2, and consequences if we launch without each 1. HVM4's AOT compiler that means compiling the HVM4 efficient C. that gives a 10x-100x speedup in practice, so, it is essential for the HVM4 back-end to be viable. without it, you'd be using 10's of threads to run an interpreter. that was the main criticism of Bend1. given that parallelism was a key feature of v1, I think we *need* a really good version of it, even though it isn't the central point anymore. we have an initial compiler, but would probably take 5-10 days of focused work to make it good 2. HVM4's GPU runtime it still doesn't have one, at all. doing so is way more complex than HVM2, because of lazy (rather than super strict) evaluation. launching without a GPU runtime would feel like a regression and this is basically locking me. probably 15 days of work 3. Bend2-SupGen integration this is really hard to do, due to Bend's dependent types. currently, SupGen is still reliable for simple types. without it, the time/cost it takes for the AI to fill all sub-proofs is still too high for it to be a viable product. we're talking about whole nights to make a small refactor. probably 5-10 days of focused work ... and that's basically it actually. if these things were ready, all the rest is trivial, and we could launch it the next week... I wonder if I should just launch Bend2 without the HVM4 back-end. keep in mind that Bend2 compiles to very fast JS, so we don't *need* HVM4 or parallelism in any way. but it would be extremely hard to communicate that, given the initial appeal of the language was parallelism and interaction nets. we have small windows where people take the time to try our stuff, so I think if it is not great, polished and covers all corners on launch, it will just be dismissed as a "not ready yet" thing for another year not sure the "move fast and break things" advice applies to when you're building a programming language, Bend1 did launch prematurely and I shouldn't let that happen again. perhaps "a delayed game is eventually good, but a rushed game is forever bad" is the advice I should be following here...
English
30
0
112
10.2K
Marc Thatcher
Marc Thatcher@MarcThatcher·
@hmajd "Don't believe the Guardian newspaper? " I'm not sure whether to laugh 😂 or cry 😢
English
0
0
0
21
Hooman Majd
Hooman Majd@hmajd·
So we're not to believe the forensic and investigative journalists who've confirmed the hit? Don't believe the Guardian newspaper? Sure, don't believe State TV, sure, that's fine, but how about satellite images? Did the Iranian regime fake those, too? If anything was AI, as the regime has used before, it would be detected. Even the US pentagon has said they're "investigating" but didn't deny the atrocity at the presser yesterday. The screams of the mothers and fathers and families of the children killed will hopefully haunt the deniers.
Omid Djalili@omid9

Nothing is proved yet Zack. The fact that you are spreading misinformation is appalling for someone in your position. To date no one has been allowed to see any evidence of casualties or even the site itself. The regime says it’s America or Israel. The Americans say they were nowhere near the area. Here’s what Iranians inside Iran say: IRGC blew it up themselves to fill it up with dead bodies of children they’ve kept on ice hidden away in cold storage from the January slaughters to put on display in order to blame their aggressors. The fact that we have not seen the evidence yet is a red flag as we know the regime would have gleefully paraded those images on television and all over the internet. Most probably they were caught on film transferring the bodies hence why there is now a media black out on this story, as well as a full internet blackout. As Iranians we know how this regime operates. We’re talking about new levels of evil. So any narrative like the one you are pushing Zack actually supports the regime in their “don’t care how many die as long as we stay in power” quest. For the love of God and humanity, please stop. #IranMassacre #IranIsraelWar

English
47
18
98
26.1K
Abby
Abby@NoCRTinSchools·
@MarcThatcher @LeeHurstComic Sigh ... I believe her comment is important and is applicable for many nations. I am American. I am applying her comment to my country. Do you have a point?
English
1
0
0
5
Lee Hurst
Lee Hurst@LeeHurstComic·
You can almost hear Lefturd heads explode as they find themselves unable to simply shout ‘racist’ at an articulate, strong minded woman because she’s black.
English
412
4K
24.4K
524.8K
Marc Thatcher
Marc Thatcher@MarcThatcher·
@CapelLofft "Possibly the less impressive Miliband brother"---oooh I winced at that!
English
0
0
0
110
Capel Lofft
Capel Lofft@CapelLofft·
Vacuous word soup, as one would expect from him. He was always totally overrated, with no substance and rather less style than often assumed. Possibly the less impressive Miliband brother - and I think that Ed would be out of his depth as deputy manager of a Little Waitrose
The New Statesman@NewStatesman

THE CHOICE BEFORE THE LABOUR PARTY by David Miliband @DMiliband In Britain we cannot afford the luxury of another failed government.  The last party leader to win  a majority and last a full term was Tony Blair in 2001.  That was a quarter of a century ago. The message since then from the electorate could not be clearer: get your act together.  A failure to do so is all that Reform have. A great aspiration weakly implemented – like a strong opinion weakly held - will get nowhere.  Ten year plans without the funds and reforms to implement them will not register. Now is the time for our leaders to lead. One great benefit of being in government is that the hard truths are staring you in the face. For example, the British economy needs booster rockets if it is to get from 1 per cent growth to 2 or anything like 3 per cent. Another hard truth is that we cannot afford to have the public services we want, the defence investment we need (and have promised), plus the commitments to pensioner and welfare benefits and the promise of a functioning social care system, on the current tax base. The biggest hard truth is that the world has changed in such a way that a manifesto written in 2024 constrains more than it enables. The Government’s approach to this has been contradictory. What we promised not to do has taken precedence over what we said we would do. On the one hand, the Government has held tight to the manifesto, for example on tax and on Europe, in ways that have been challenged by changed reality. On the other hand, the government has jettisoned the five “missions” that were the strategic political backbone of its promise to the electorate. The right thing to do is to start from the condition of the country and ambitions for the country, and have the policies that emerge in service of our values define the political identity, rather than vice versa. That is how successful governments have broken new ground, and created a new and distinctive politics. Labour won the last election with the dividing line of change versus no change.  That is always an attractive formula.  It will be the foundation of Reform’s effort next time.  For Labour, as the incumbent party, the dividing line needs to be good change versus bad change. That is in our power to establish. newstatesman.com/politics/uk-po…

English
7
26
205
12.1K
Abby
Abby@NoCRTinSchools·
No, of course not. But, her point has broader meaning than just the UK. Her ideas can be applied to other countries as well. Why do you think her ideas only apply to the Brits? And, why do you find it so odd that you would smugly laugh? I think it's self-evident that this could apply to any country and find your response odd.
English
1
0
0
10
Abby
Abby@NoCRTinSchools·
@LeeHurstComic This is an excellent point. We should strive to be multi-ethnic, not multi-cultural. One, American culture, should be the umbrella that ties us all together.
English
1
0
23
1.6K