
Going by the numbers reported in that article at least 1/3 -1/2 of a UKSF sized unit are currently under investigation and facing legal action by the enemy rights lawyers. Jesus no wonder they are signing off on their droves. They should charge the human rights lawyers with the treason act of 1351, Giving aid and comfort to the enemy. barristers can’t knock back a client under the cap rank rule but the instructing solicitor does not have the same obligations and can refuse clients they accepted the Taliban and ISIS as clients you can be held accountable for that lack or moral judgement and charge them with treason. It’s fairly easy to prove look at the number of UKSF sign offs due to the persecutions ask former members for the evidence why. You prove that then the government can go after those firms for compensation for loss of service, capabilities and costs. What is it to train a SF soldier £1m a head, loss of those experienced operators has had operational effects say capture a Russian oil tanker that’s $120-160million each in cargo that could be offsetting our Ukraine expense etc. At a minimum it will make the indemnity insurance provider of these lawyers alter the terms and conditions of the insurance if they are going to be on the hook for government level billion pound claims. They can rewrite the policy to exclude any claims from enemy combatants and associates from coverage.












