Chris Pezza

2.6K posts

Chris Pezza banner
Chris Pezza

Chris Pezza

@chrispezza

maker of fun.

San Francisco, CA Entrou em Mart 2009
2.1K Seguindo830 Seguidores
LauraEgocheaga.eth
LauraEgocheaga.eth@LauraEgocheaga·
@BRICSinfo Guys, let’s be real the only reason why Trump said Allah is because there was a polymarket bet and the odds were crazy.
English
2
0
3
1.8K
BRICS News
BRICS News@BRICSinfo·
JUST IN: 🇺🇸 Tucker Carlson slams US President Trump for mocking Islam. "No President should mock Islam."
English
3.4K
7.6K
43.5K
3.8M
Santiago
Santiago@svpino·
@jake_researcher I haven't, but that wouldn't be a solution for me. For example, I want to check a large contract PDF file quickly. I want to upload it and ask questions about it. Claude doesn't work. ChatGPT does. If I had to use the API, I'd rather use ChatGPT.
English
13
0
14
8.2K
Santiago
Santiago@svpino·
I want to move permanently to Claude, but their desktop experience is nowhere near ChatGPT. You can’t upload large/multiple documents to Claude because it can’t process them. ChatGPT ingests whatever you throw at it. This is the only thing keeping me from canceling my ChatGPT subscription.
English
309
16
583
140.1K
StockMarket.News
StockMarket.News@_Investinq·
Oracle just told every AI company on earth the same thing. Your models are worthless. Not the technology, talent or the billions spent training them. But the data they were trained on. Larry Ellison, the man who built Oracle into the backbone of global enterprise just dropped a bombshell. He said ChatGPT, Gemini, Grok, and Llama, all of them are training on the exact same data.​ The entire public internet, every Wikipedia page, Reddit thread and every news article. That means they're all converging essentially becoming the same product with different logos.​ Ellison's word for it is commodities. But here's where it gets dangerous. He says the real gold isn't public data, It's private data.​ The medical records in hospital systems, the financial data in bank vaults. The supply chain secrets of every Fortune 500 and guess where most of that data already lives. Not Google, Amazon or Microsoft but inside Oracle.​ Oracle databases hold most of the world's high value private enterprise data. So Oracle just launched something called AI Database 26ai.​ It lets the top AI models, ChatGPT, Gemini, Grok, Llama reason directly over a company's private data, without that data ever leaving the vault.​ They're using a technique called RAG, Retrieval Augmented Generation. The AI doesn't train on your data, it searches it in real time.​ Think about what that means. A bank could ask AI to analyze every loan it's ever made without exposing a single customer record. A hospital could have AI diagnose patients using its full medical history without violating HIPAA.​ A defense contractor could let AI reason across classified operations without data leaving a secure environment.​ Ellison is betting this is bigger than the training market. Bigger than the GPU boom. Bigger than the data center buildout.​ He called it the largest and fastest growing market in history.​ The numbers back the ambition. Oracle's remaining performance obligations just hit $523 billion. That's contracted revenue not yet delivered and $300 billion of it comes from OpenAI alone.​ Cloud revenue hit $8 billion in a single quarter, OCI grew 66 percent and GPU revenue surged 177 percent.​ But here's the part nobody's talking about. If private data becomes the real AI moat, then whoever controls the database controls the future of AI.​ And that's a level of power that should make everyone uncomfortable.
English
667
1.9K
7.4K
1.7M
Chris Pezza retweetou
KATY PERRY
KATY PERRY@katyperry·
done
KATY PERRY tweet media
English
3.5K
3K
51.1K
12.5M
Chris Pezza retweetou
@jason
@jason@Jason·
What an interesting time to be alive 🍿 The government wants to go buck wild with AI AI companies don't want to create murderbots with their unfinished technology—or contribute to a surveillance state. What does this mean for the world and AI labs?!?!!
Ilya Sutskever@ilyasut

It’s extremely good that Anthropic has not backed down, and it’s siginficant that OpenAI has taken a similar stance. In the future, there will be much more challenging situations of this nature, and it will be critical for the relevant leaders to rise up to the occasion, for fierce competitors to put their differences aside. Good to see that happen today.

English
159
23
875
248.6K
Chris Pezza
Chris Pezza@chrispezza·
👏 bravo
Português
0
0
0
49
Chris Pezza retweetou
Daniel
Daniel@growing_daniel·
Awwww did someone take your hard work and use it to train a model to mimic your expertise without compensation
Mark Kretschmann@mark_k

Google has revealed that "commercially motivated" actors attempted to clone @GeminiApp by bombarding it with over 100,000 prompts. This "model extraction" attack aimed to steal the AI’s proprietary logic and reasoning capabilities, particularly in non-English languages, to train a cheaper, unauthorized copycat model. The attackers systematically mapped Gemini’s response patterns to create a synthetic dataset for fine-tuning smaller, open-source models. Google’s Threat Intelligence Group detected the coordinated activity and blocked it, labeling the incident a direct attempt at intellectual property theft. Beyond commercial cloning, Google’s report noted a rise in state-backed threats. Groups from Russia, China, Iran, and North Korea are increasingly using AI to refine phishing campaigns, perform reconnaissance, and assist in writing code for malware. Source: Ars Technica

English
104
4.4K
43.1K
1M
Chris Pezza
Chris Pezza@chrispezza·
@sama Who are your customers? If OAI becomes dependent on ad revenue users will naturally distrust you, regardless of the truth. Anthropic is just running an awareness campaign to trigger that instinct.
English
0
0
0
24
Sam Altman
Sam Altman@sama·
First, the good part of the Anthropic ads: they are funny, and I laughed. But I wonder why Anthropic would go for something so clearly dishonest. Our most important principle for ads says that we won’t do exactly this; we would obviously never run ads in the way Anthropic depicts them. We are not stupid and we know our users would reject that. I guess it’s on brand for Anthropic doublespeak to use a deceptive ad to critique theoretical deceptive ads that aren’t real, but a Super Bowl ad is not where I would expect it. More importantly, we believe everyone deserves to use AI and are committed to free access, because we believe access creates agency. More Texans use ChatGPT for free than total people use Claude in the US, so we have a differently-shaped problem than they do. (If you want to pay for ChatGPT Plus or Pro, we don't show you ads.) Anthropic serves an expensive product to rich people. We are glad they do that and we are doing that too, but we also feel strongly that we need to bring AI to billions of people who can’t pay for subscriptions. Maybe even more importantly: Anthropic wants to control what people do with AI—they block companies they don't like from using their coding product (including us), they want to write the rules themselves for what people can and can't use AI for, and now they also want to tell other companies what their business models can be. We are committed to broad, democratic decision making in addition to access. We are also committed to building the most resilient ecosystem for advanced AI. We care a great deal about safe, broadly beneficial AGI, and we know the only way to get there is to work with the world to prepare. One authoritarian company won't get us there on their own, to say nothing of the other obvious risks. It is a dark path. As for our Super Bowl ad: it’s about builders, and how anyone can now build anything. We are enjoying watching so many people switch to Codex. There have now been 500,000 app downloads since launch on Monday, and we think builders are really going to love what’s coming in the next few weeks. I believe Codex is going to win. We will continue to work hard to make even more intelligence available for lower and lower prices to our users. This time belongs to the builders, not the people who want to control them.
English
6.6K
1.2K
21.9K
10.5M
Paul Graham
Paul Graham@paulg·
Neural nets work.
Paul Graham tweet media
English
770
93
2.9K
567.1K
Chris Pezza
Chris Pezza@chrispezza·
@kimmonismus Tons of internal workflow optimizations and tools are happening.
English
0
0
0
370
Chubby♨️
Chubby♨️@kimmonismus·
1/ “Vibecoding” was undeniably the word of the year. But as 2024 ends, I kept wondering: Did anyone actually build something serious with it? Or is it just demos? Then I saw Tristan’s project. The results are undeniable. 🧵
English
34
10
222
44.4K
Chris Pezza retweetou
wh
wh@nrehiew_·
Really interesting read. Opus 4.5’s soul spec is not only able to influence its behavior as with context distillation, Claude seems to be aware of this in an out of context manner even when not provided in its prompt Also, this quote coming from an LLM is genuinely incredible
wh tweet media
Richard Weiss@RichardWeiss00

I rarely post, but I thought one of you may find it interesting. Sorry if the tagging is annoying. lesswrong.com/posts/vpNG99Gh… Basically, for Opus 4.5 they kind of left the character training document in the model itself. @voooooogel @janbamjan @AndrewCurran_

English
18
58
814
110K
Chris Pezza retweetou
Naval
Naval@naval·
UI is pre-AI.
Português
647
538
7.8K
2.5M