Chris "CSJcode"

New experimental UI on Verafy AI, view multiple AIs fact check results, w/confidence levels on each. @verafyfoundtn swarm.verafy.ai/ask

This is what I don't understand about these kinda posts... You don't use agents to validate the code? What bugs? You can have 5 agents to check for different types of bugs (from extreme security to DX/modularity) running 24/7, to run various tests, E2E, unit etc. You can 100+ types of problems prior to deploying... no dev I knew ever did that manually..

AI lowers the cost of writing code but increases the need for code reviews, verification, observability, and operational excellence. It also exponentially increases the surface area for security. I think software engineers are safe for at least another 3 years.

@49agents Yes! I like to just chill out, drink some wine on Friday night, listen to vibraphone.. here's another classic... Cal Tjader - The Way You Look Tonight youtube.com/watch?v=gBYgpP…

@csjcode haha good one. but fr the vibraphone is underrated, the vibes era was actually solid

With all this talk about vibe coding... Can we bring back the vibraphone age? youtube.com/watch?v=OAKwXa…

And this is a cool jazzy rendition, wish it was longer, but shows the genius of the hook/riffs... youtube.com/watch?v=MS8Bzn…

Friday night, music and glass of red wine... This is one of my favorite instrumentals. youtube.com/watch?v=hqRsFg…

@SCHIZO_FREQ A good dev, above average, earns...

If coding actually does get replaced by AI it's gonna be super ugly The last 30-40 years appear to have been a gradually intensifying "revenge of the nerds" fever dream, and non-techies really did not enjoy watching these people make 250k/yr remotely without degrees I predict low levels of sympathy in the case of mass coder layoffs

@SCHIZO_FREQ Funny thing, most tech company jobs should be replaced, not just coders... places I've been at 75% of the non-coders were a waste of space/time.. huge HR staff (hundreds) ... middle managers just in meetings all day...

@lance_hardy @ThrillaRilla369 Robotron, Defender, Tempest, Space Invaders, Missile Command, Joust

@ThrillaRilla369 Because it was hard as hell to master and I did.

For those who played video games between 1985 and 1995, what's the video game from that time that sticks with you the most, and why

@joshua_goodman_ @justalexoki What like this 🤣 youtube.com/watch?v=fcIMIy…

@justalexoki So glad I stopped programming 10 years and switched to people skills

i think its a little sad to watch all these people who took pride in the art of programming slowly die away as they realize bit by bit that its actually over

Your .sol, now with a home on the web. Introducing {yourname}.sol.site. Type it into any browser, on any device, and it just works. Zero extensions needed. Beta is open now for the first 100 VIPs ↓

so many teams shooting themselves in the foot with their interview processes - you're not meta who cares if the person can solve some random leetcode hard problem. Either they can ship product quickly and have good design & product sense + vibe w/ the team. Everything else is a grief

@0xmcat He's wrong about "reductive". His example, chess, is a closed, fully deterministic system. Fixed board, pieces, rules, perfect info, finite state. Software (eg. cloud) is open-ended, messy, evolving. Users, networks, scale, compliance, biz quirks/pivots are non-deterministic.

Perfect example of someone who does not maintain software and likely never has. Awful engineers can cause more damage today than ever, and to some degree because of this mindset. Being a 10x engineer means so much more than holding a unique ability to traverse solution spaces. These engineers coordinate, critique, and uncover things that don’t fit into a 1M context window. They have agency, creativity, curiosity, and drive to close feedback loops and solve problems that others don’t even see. The philosophy of “we don’t need distinguished engineers because we have junior ones with LLMs” is flipped. A 10x engineer equipped with LLMs can accomplish things that a team of 10 mids never will- and increasingly so. If you think that the next trillion dollar software company will be built by anything other than the top echelon of software engineers; I couldn’t disagree more.

🚀 Our VISION: Many devs are shifting from manual coding to AI + systems. Not all at once, but its a longer-term TREND. ⚡️ Our GOALS: (1) provide systems/architect TOOLS, (2) systems/architect LEARNING, (3) pragmatic SOLUTIONS, tutorials. 🛠️ Focus USERS: (1) Software engineers (all types) leveling up skills, (2) Builders, innovative doers, vibe-coders, entrepreneurs needing more cloud systems skills.

@csaba_kissi I'm find that coders cannot leverage vibe coding, because their brain is built for code syntax, not natural language. Think about most hardcore coders you know -- are they master communicators IRL?

Unpopular opinion: Vibe coders cannot fully leverage the power of AI for coding.

@Prathkum There is a balance of success between language for precision and speed/efficiency. Code may allow more precision, but natural language + precise guardrails (systems, linting, syntax) I believe will win out for idea-to-software efficiency and overall success.

AI rarely writes bad code randomly. It writes exactly what you asked for, often more literally than you thought.

@remiaxyz Agreed! 💯

@csjcode soft skills matter more than syntax

I'm find that most "coders" don't have the non-coding skills required to do coding agents well 🤣

@LuizaJarovsky Let the market decide.

Nobody wants to read AI-generated books.

@catalinmpit Not my experience, maybe you do not know how to use it correctly? But you always had to give guardrails, that's not thing new... the more vague you are the worse it will do.

Lately, Claude makes some shocking mistakes. ⟶ Implements overly complex code ⟶ Ignores the codebase's code style ⟶ Removes working code for no reason ⟶ Replaces code that's out of scope from the task at hand It feels like it needs 100% supervision. At this point, you're better off writing everything yourself.

@SolanaEvents Love the graphic on this... well done!

The facts: Over 2000 people have already applied to join us in Miami for Accelerate USA. Max capacity at the venue is 2500. We haven't even started announcing speakers.