What does the science say

Blocked harder than CO2 blocks infrared radiation.

@NoTricksZone Quick! Inform the planet it should immediately change to -18c because co2 is now not capable of greenhouse effect.

Physicists: CO2 Molecules Retain Heat Just 0.0001 Of A Second, Meaning CO2-Driven Warming ‘Not Possible’ notrickszone.com/2019/10/17/phy…

@brjma @yota_berlin Haha! Nice stuff Brendan, you nailed it 💪

@yota_berlin @KiryeNet Someone should inform the planet it should immediately change to -18c because of this amazing study

@AndyOz2 @EcoSenseNow Hi Andy, if Australia implemented a carbon tax, why would we give the money directly to the One World Order? Surely we’d decide to keep it!

Polar bear expert Susan Crockford has been mistreated by the University of Victoria and they should be held accountable. She is brilliant and has been denied her academic freedom. This account by Donna Laframbois is a must read. What a travesty. business.financialpost.com/opinion/was-th…

@SimonMaxfield8 @ClimateRealists @Channel4News @alextomo Your graph looked like it was put together by a child, it looks dubious. You also don’t seem to understand what it is showing

@does_science @ClimateRealists @Channel4News @alextomo "Those graphs ARE from the DMI, yours was not." No shit, Sherlock. My graph simply uses their graphs to give the years in question. Does my graph contradict theirs, hmm? Now explain why the Danish Meteorological Institute's data and graphs are "dubious".

This glacier in Greenland is melting at such an alarming rate it’s threatening coastal cities around the world. Every day it releases more water into the ocean than New York or London use in a year. @alextomo is in Ilulissat to find out what that means.

@SimonMaxfield8 @ClimateRealists @Channel4News @alextomo Those graphs ARE from the DMI, yours was not. It should also be noted that these are additions to SMB, ie not including melting

@does_science @ClimateRealists @Channel4News @alextomo @does_science 2019: polarportal.dk/fileadmin/pola… Now, Einstein - explain why the Danish Meteorological Institute's data and graphs are "dubious". I'll wait . . .

@SimonMaxfield8 @ClimateRealists @Channel4News @alextomo You couldn’t post a more dubious looking graph, and the fact you did it in a tweet calling the news misleading is so ironic

@Channel4News @alextomo Greenland gained 22 billion tons of snow in two days last November. Over the past three years, Greenland's surface has gained about 250 billion tons more mass than normal. Channel 4 News should do some actual research instead of promoting misleading climate scare stories.

@scrowder @jack First take the plank out of your own eye youtu.be/PrNmq4ouWww

@ClimateCatastr1 @MRobertsQLD @teena_moda @ProfBrianCox You're practically a new age Orwell, don't know how I haven't read more of your works

@MRobertsQLD @teena_moda @ProfBrianCox Always trust the raw data. Adjusted data is only designed to manipulate the unwitting to believe something that they otherwise wouldn't.

Please note that this is an (excellent) parody account. Given that it’s indistinguishable from the real Malcolm in its towering stupidity, it’s understandable that many people are getting caught out :-)

@Doug_J_Mitchell @MRobertsQLD @ProfBrianCox These replies certainly are an exercise in delineating the satire from the pure and unabashed ignorance

@MRobertsQLD @ProfBrianCox Malcolm, NOT EVERYTHING IS A CONSPIRACY FOR THE BAD! You're doing great work exposing the climate change fraud, and now on the banks. The Moon Landing is a conspiracy for the good! Do some research with a mind not defined by stupid axioms! #Apollo50Aus

@MRobertsQLD @ProfBrianCox Of course they only are "manipulated" if you go out of your way misinterpret them. berkeleyearth.org/understanding-…

@ProfBrianCox Is this the same .@profbrianCox who held up manipulated temp graphs on Q&A thinking they supported his climate alarmist position? Unlike Cox I do not need to use labels and smears. That always hides lack of data and lack of logical argument. Hence Cox’s need to label and smear

@JunkScience @YahooFinance A carbon tax is actually the most well supported (empirically) in the scientific literature. Your assertion is baseless

A CO2 tax is not a 'plan' that will alter climate or weather in the least. There is no math that shows otherwise. finance.yahoo.com/news/2020-cand… via @YahooFinance

@markcojuangco @luisbaram Well because I'm not actually familiar with the exact numbers, just being conservative, by the looks of it it could be 1, but I agree zero most likely. Future impacts also should be considered, of course highly uncertain, nonetheless small.

If your job is emptying a swimming pool with a spoon and two guys are throwing bucketfuls of water every minute, then you should probably get another job that is not pointless.

@markcojuangco @luisbaram And it's been argued the evac caused >1000 consequent deaths. Fukushima is an case study of the safety of nuclear

@markcojuangco @luisbaram To think Fukushima is used as a reason to not use nuclear is baffling. Less than 10 can be said to have from radiation (absolute max)

@markcojuangco @luisbaram *genuinely

@markcojuangco @luisbaram That megaton gaff was genuineness bizarre But nuclear is fundamentally about uncertainty and with such high stakes precautions seem needed