mod323

722 posts

mod323

mod323

@itsmod323

credit enjooyer @credifi

Entrou em Eylül 2018
1.4K Seguindo562 Seguidores
mod323 retweetou
ST0RM
ST0RM@0xStorm·
@credifi 5 click loan Gud tek Bullish onchain credit
English
0
2
4
375
mod323 retweetou
Credifi
Credifi@credifi·
Lending is now live on Credifi for existing users with positive repayment history. Borrow for a 3-month term at a fixed 10% APR with flexible repayment options: • Equal monthly installments (principal + interest) • Interest-only payments with full principal due in the final month
English
6
8
37
4.9K
PaperImperium
PaperImperium@ImperiumPaper·
An amazing new version of this is playing out in real time in Bolivia. Several days ago, a cargo plane carrying *18 tons* of Bolivian banknotes - around $60 million in USD - crashed, raining money. Predictably, people have been scrambling to scoop up this cash as the government attempts to locate and burn it on the spot to prevent it from entering circulation via the local populace or federal authorities on the ground who might succumb to temptation. Less predictably, the Bolivian central bank has declared all notes with those serial numbers void. Swinging back to “predictably”, chaos has hit the cash market. Vendors and stores are understandably loathe to risk being passed voided banknotes that are identical except for having a serial number on a very, very long list of voided numbers. So cash is now no longer a very good medium because the invalid notes cannot be easily identified by humans. Self-custody isn’t always enough to resist censorship, example number two.
PaperImperium@ImperiumPaper

It’s worth pointing out that an unfreezable asset does no good if it can’t be spent. In 1945, Finland, who had managed to fight the Allies, the Axis, and the Communist bloc at various points in WWII, had a population sitting on piles of cash (goods were rationed during the war) and few things to buy with them. Fearing a burst of inflation similar to what the US experienced post-COVID, the Finnish authorities came up with a novel way enact financial repression on otherwise censorship resistant cash. Effective immediately, all large denomination bills were to be cut in half. The left side was still cash - worth half the face value. The right side was now a 4-year bond yielding a paltry 2%. Needless to say, Finland still suffered robust inflation (well above 2% paid). It also left bank accounts untouched, for reasons I’m not clear upon. As you know, most of the monetary base is made up of bank deposits, not physical cash. But it’s a good example of how even if the asset itself has no freeze or burn function, if those who would otherwise accept it in payment can be squeezed, you still have a problem.

English
4
5
99
9.9K
mod323
mod323@itsmod323·
@ImperiumPaper low cost of capital, low cost of information to underwrite, automation and speed of loan origination
English
0
0
3
124
PaperImperium
PaperImperium@ImperiumPaper·
Unsecured lending is still a frontier in DeFi, but it’s an enormous opportunity. The low cost of capital onchain, coupled with the automation built into blockchains and DeFi by their very nature, should make for a competitive advantage against traditional lenders (both commercial and consumer). The missing ingredient, of course, is risk management. DeFi has generally depended upon overcollateralized lending of onchain assets to skip the trickiest parts of risk management in lending. Can a liquidator instantly dump the collateral into a DEX? Are there cheap or free flash loans available for liquidators so they don’t have to sit around with idle capital? If yes to both, list it as a supported collateral. No one cares who issued the token as long as it’s marketable and doesn’t have back doors in the token contract. That’s a bit of an oversimplification, but not by a lot. But it works. It keeps credit losses low, and recovery times effectively zero. Right now, some companies and protocols are experimenting with tokenized RWAs. These generally lack secondary market liquidity, so risk management now requires underwriting the issuer of the asset. This has been a bumpy road, but things finally seem to be on a sustainable trajectory for more collaterals being eligible for the usually-low rates found onchain. Rates are usually low, of course, because DeFi struggles to originate enough debt to satisfy the demand for lending. So inevitably unsecured lending will have to become solved problem. It’s also an enormous market. In the US alone, there was about $18T in consumer unsecured debt at the beginning of 2025. That number gets much, much larger with business lending. Personally, I think consumer unsecured lending will be sustainable onchain before business lending, simply because it’s more susceptible to the Law of Large numbers. Crypto may not be great at understanding the covenants of private credit sometimes, but it has a lot of very numerate people who can deal with a large volume of smaller, granular loans to build out a risk framework. And that risk framework is important. Let’s take a look at US credit cards to understand the economics of unsecured lending. In the screenshot, you’ll see a bar chart based on 2023 data from the Federal Reserve. As you can see, DeFi can simplify a lot of this for both sides of the deal. The non-interest yield (aka fees that everyone hates) is generally not a thing in within DeFi. The non-interest expense (back office, underwriting, recovery, compliance, etc) is also considerably smaller in DeFi. If you remove those two, you already get a much cheaper product for consumers and fatter margins in DeFi. But look at that credit loss bar. It’s about 4%. And that’s kept low by a lot of those non-interest expenses, as well as legal recourse and processes to monitor credit migration (just because someone was a good credit quality a year ago when they opened their card doesn’t mean they are today). This is where DeFi has a huge hole. It’s probably the case that the non-interest expense cannot be completely stripped out without credit loss exploding. The good news is that credit losses in this graph could actually grow quite a bit and still work financially. But these things tend towards binary outcomes, since you’re dealing with large numbers of users, and any flaw in your underwriting, monitoring, and raising/lowering credit limit methodology can blow you up. And of course there’s also just things beyond your control. A borrower on Aave can lose their job and it not affect the credit quality of the loan — it just needs plenty of collateral. So unsecured is much, much more complex, even if you design it to minimize fraud. It’s a big prize though. I suspect we’ll see at least some specialized lenders coming in to use their own loan portfolios as collateral to borrow in DeFi, but the big unlock will be finding ways to screen or filter users directly at the protocol level.
PaperImperium tweet media
English
10
3
62
13K
DeFi Dad ⟠ defidad.eth
DeFi Dad ⟠ defidad.eth@DeFi_Dad·
I applied to refinance a car loan with @LendingClub. They wanted 2 years of tax returns, invoices for the past year proving where my income comes from, and bank statements going back 90 days to prove income and it still wasn't enough in the end. I finally gave up and told them "You're asking me for too way too much information. My tax return is already super invasive to share but given I'm self-employed I did it. Now you want invoices to prove my income is legitimate? For someone married with a wife who has a W2, me with a credit score of 800+, a history 100% on-time payments, no derogatory mark on my credit history." If you're thinking, I must be buying something expensive, some overpriced luxury car--nope, it's just a $45k used Chevy, nothing flashy but perfect for me and the kids. I'll just borrow with DeFi even though, I was hoping to take advantage of TradFi for this. There's no way this isn't related to the lingering effects of OC 2.0.
English
44
4
120
14.4K
mod323 retweetou
Credifi
Credifi@credifi·
4% Fixed rate. No collateral. No liquidations. No fees.
English
6
3
37
3.3K
mod323 retweetou
Leviathan News
Leviathan News@leviathan_news·
Credifi aims to lower unsecured credit costs by using cryptography and DeFi to reduce verification, underwriting, and enforcement friction. By improving trust and information efficiency, it targets cheaper, more accessible credit beyond overcollateralized lending.
mod323@itsmod323

x.com/i/article/2001…

English
2
2
8
2.8K
mod323 retweetou
Aaron Ash
Aaron Ash@aaronash·
Credifi originates unsecured loans onchain by minting Credit tokens used as collateral in an @eulerfinance vault. Our backend verifies each user and issues a unique ERC-1155 certificate. Through the Credifi adaptor, that 1155 is swapped for ERC-20 Credit tokens, which are then posted as collateral for stablecoin loans.
Credifi@credifi

Credifi v.1 goes live today! Borrow $100–$20K for three months at 4% fixed interest rate. No collateral. No fees.

English
2
2
7
1.1K
mod323
mod323@itsmod323·
scaling credit is constrained by two costs: verifying a borrower and enforcing consequences for non-payment. cryptography and DeFi materially reduce both - enabling verifiable, transparent, and privacy preserving credit to scale like never before.
mod323@itsmod323

x.com/i/article/2001…

English
3
5
24
3.7K
mod323 retweetou
Credifi
Credifi@credifi·
Credifi is live to anyone in the US with a bank account. No crypto wallet needed. Loans paid in crypto, Venmo, Paypal or bank ACH. See this guide for a step by step walkthrough on how to use Credifi. credi.fi/learn-more/int…
Credifi tweet media
English
1
2
24
1.6K
mod323 retweetou
Credifi
Credifi@credifi·
- Go to credi.fi - Verify via Plaid to unlock your credit line. - Receive loan via bank ACH, Venmo, PayPal, Honey on @berachain or USDC on @base Who’s eligible? US residents with a bank account + a credit score ≥ 680
English
1
1
29
3.5K
Route 2 FI
Route 2 FI@Route2FI·
Will we ever manage to solve lending/borrowing in DeFi as in the tradFi world? Overcollateralized lending in DeFi today is capital inefficient. Why put down collateral worth $10,000 to take out a $5,000 loan?  Unlike in TradFi where commercial banks have a lot of data about you and thus can rely on your creditworthiness, lenders and borrowers don’t know each other. When someone borrows from the lending protocol, you don’t know his credit history. Overcollateralization ensures that if the borrower defaults on his loan, the collateral will be sold to give lenders’ money back. This problem sounds pretty much impossible to solve in DeFi, like why would someone lend you $10k if you only put down eg. $2k? Is any protocols looking into this with a credit system?
English
74
7
123
26.8K
mod323 retweetou
Alexander Lin
Alexander Lin@linfluence·
After nearly a year of building out @reforge_vc’s internal AI engine with @carlhua, this is one of the first public discussions of how we’re using it to source founders before anyone else. Overall, a super fun conversation with @AndrewSteinwold on my past, the origins of Reforge, and what it means to be a coordination stack venture capital firm.
Angels to Allocators@Angels2Allo

New episode out now with @linfluence of @reforge_vc 🎙️ He breaks down how he spots frontier opportunities in programmable money, infrastructure, and the coordination stack. Inside the ep: 🔧 Why coordination systems are breaking and where the rebuild starts 🏦 How Reforge sources founders earlier than many traditional funds 🤖 Using AI agents to support deal sourcing and diligence 🌱 What a coming secular spring may mean for crypto and capital markets Watch: youtu.be/IBWdIy3LpSM Listen: tinyurl.com/A2A-Ep-51

English
8
4
66
19K