Luke

6.8K posts

Luke banner
Luke

Luke

@ldo_dev

Building @LogoLattice to make the best in browser logo creator 🎨 Building @FlowInvoice so you can get paid faster and stress less 💰

Entrou em Aralık 2010
459 Seguindo2.1K Seguidores
Tweet fixado
Luke
Luke@ldo_dev·
Creating a new logo shouldn't take ages. I wanted something fast, simple and free. So I built Logo Lattice. 100% free. 100% browser based. 100% ownership of creations. Link in first comment 👀
English
108
76
1.6K
245K
Luke
Luke@ldo_dev·
@LailaAiClub Yeah I'll definitely be automating which model is recommended. I'll also give the user the option on changing their model too
English
0
0
1
2
Laila
Laila@LailaAiClub·
@ldo_dev That approach makes a lot of sense, smart way to adapt the model to the task
English
1
0
1
4
Luke
Luke@ldo_dev·
LLM testing update for Logo Lattice: Opus 4.8 is struggling the most. Inconsistent coordinates, breaks schema rules, can't hold geometric precision across attempts Complex shapes: decent. Simple shapes: inconsistent. Maybe I need model routing based on logo complexity 🤯
Luke tweet media
Luke@ldo_dev

I'm integrating LLMs into Logo Lattice, but not for image generation It gets a brief ("minimal fintech mark, teal + charcoal") & our schema It return JSON: shapes, points, grid snaps, fills Testing GPT/Claude/Gemini What would you try for structured spatial JSON?

English
8
0
11
313
Luke
Luke@ldo_dev·
@vaademola I'm writing it up at the moment :) I'll post about it in article form when it's finished. Should hopefully be out today
English
0
0
0
1
Luke
Luke@ldo_dev·
I'm integrating LLMs into Logo Lattice, but not for image generation It gets a brief ("minimal fintech mark, teal + charcoal") & our schema It return JSON: shapes, points, grid snaps, fills Testing GPT/Claude/Gemini What would you try for structured spatial JSON?
Luke tweet media
English
8
1
12
669
Luke
Luke@ldo_dev·
@TechWithMatteo That's really interesting to note. Did you find that any other models were any better? From my limited testing across limited models, I've found that gpt5.5 and Opus 4.7 are leading at the moment
English
0
0
0
4
Tech With Matteo
Tech With Matteo@TechWithMatteo·
@ldo_dev model routing on complexity is smart, i had similar issues with Claude on structured outputs where simpler tasks were somehow less reliable than complex ones, feels counterintuitive but its a real pattern
English
1
0
1
16
Luke
Luke@ldo_dev·
@aaliya_va Yeah definitely. I think I'll try and handle it semi-automatically with a script that rates the complexity of the prompt, but I'll also give the user the ability to choose their own model
English
0
0
1
7
Aaliya
Aaliya@aaliya_va·
@ldo_dev Model performance changing with task complexity is very real
English
1
0
1
17
Luke
Luke@ldo_dev·
@SaniAiTech Yeah definitely. I'm going to write a script to determine the complexity of a prompt, and then have a popup with a different model recommendation. Lots to work out with it
English
0
0
0
2
Sani Ai Tech
Sani Ai Tech@SaniAiTech·
@ldo_dev Interesting finding—seems like Opus 4.8 struggles with strict geometry but does better on complex shapes. Model routing based on logo complexity might be the real solution here 🤯
English
1
0
1
43
Luke
Luke@ldo_dev·
@NiravJ3 I’ll be releasing a full write up of my findings for it. Lots of weirdness 🤣
English
0
0
1
1
Nirav
Nirav@NiravJ3·
@ldo_dev thats great. good to know. i'll keep that in mind when i need to use something for image gen.
English
1
0
1
11
Luke
Luke@ldo_dev·
@farrux_hewson I have created an internal benchmark. I’ll release my findings when I’ve finished writing them up. Open sourcing it is a good idea too. It’s very niche but interesting
English
0
0
1
8
Farrux Hewson
Farrux Hewson@farrux_hewson·
@ldo_dev You should create internal benchmark and make it open source, research community will like it!
English
1
0
1
16
Luke
Luke@ldo_dev·
@NiravJ3 I’ve also I’ve found that Riverflow is also really good. Comparable to Image 2 for what I’m using it for at a tenth of the cost
English
1
0
1
15
Nirav
Nirav@NiravJ3·
@ldo_dev this is only for json generation. for feedback on generated logos, gpt image 2 is still best
English
1
0
1
20
Luke
Luke@ldo_dev·
@itsjoaki Opus 4.7 is better, gpt5.5 is still far superior. Lots of testing!
English
0
0
0
9
Joaki
Joaki@itsjoaki·
@ldo_dev so is opus 4.8 not that good?? better to get back to opus 4.7?
English
1
0
1
22
Luke
Luke@ldo_dev·
@vaademola Yeah the tests are weird too. Not at all what I would expect 🤣
English
1
0
1
6
Victor Ademola
Victor Ademola@vaademola·
@ldo_dev Nice. It's better to do real testing than relying on assumption
English
1
0
1
9
Luke
Luke@ldo_dev·
@bas_fijneman GPT5.5 and Opus 4.7 are by far the best two so far. I’m mid write up of my tests. I also will run some more benchmarks on text based logos too. This is just the start of the can of worms I’ve found 👀
English
0
0
0
15
Bas Fijneman
Bas Fijneman@bas_fijneman·
@ldo_dev Hmm I would advise staying with 4.7 for this for now! I see to many inconsistencies atm. Also a lot of work done that I didnt ask for
English
1
0
1
48
Luke
Luke@ldo_dev·
@yusukelp I actually got it to generate me a Rubik’s cube the other day. I’ve done so much work on the LLM integration for Describe!
Luke tweet media
English
0
0
1
9
Yusuke
Yusuke@yusukelp·
Good morning builders☀️ Pitch your app in 5 words👇 I’ll go first
English
15
1
17
438
Luke
Luke@ldo_dev·
@MythThrazz 55k views a day on average is so hard to do without consistently posting engagement farming or striking gold on a super viral post 😂
English
1
0
3
27
Marcin Dudek
Marcin Dudek@MythThrazz·
I think its not a problem to get 5M impressions overall. It’s a challange to do so without: - spamming - cheating - crypto - sports - ragebaiting - politics What’s left is unique trivia and wholesome content.
English
5
0
12
188
Luke
Luke@ldo_dev·
@zuess05 Have a great day man!
English
1
0
1
35
Luke
Luke@ldo_dev·
@stijnvwx It'll come! You got this, just stay at it :)
English
1
0
2
40
Stijn
Stijn@stijnvwx·
Goal was 1K by end of May. Hit 750 today. Missed the target, but I'm way further than if I'd aimed low. That's the thing about big goals: You either hit them or you grow into someone who can. Still counts as a small win today.
Stijn tweet media
English
10
0
19
286
Luke
Luke@ldo_dev·
@theo It's really bad at converting text prompts to an editable, grid snapped vector though. Like really bad.
Luke tweet media
English
0
0
0
26
Theo - t3.gg
Theo - t3.gg@theo·
It is possible that Opus 4.8 is a much better model than I give it credit for, and it is held back terribly by Claude Code. Sadly I cannot confirm this myself without spending thousands of dollars because their API prices are absurd and you can't use your sub anywhere good.
Theo - t3.gg@theo

I haven't used Claude Code much recently. Are these write failures just, like, expected? I haven't seen this many random tool call errors since I last used a Gemini model

English
86
8
757
65K
Luke
Luke@ldo_dev·
@stijnvwx Yeah I agree. I've just finished my benchmark and I definitely think 5.5 is the best at my use case. It's interesting though, because other models you think would be good, are really bad. I'll write up my thoughts on them
English
1
0
1
10
Stijn
Stijn@stijnvwx·
@ldo_dev I would go for GPT-5.5. Think it would work best
English
1
0
1
20
Victor Ademola
Victor Ademola@vaademola·
@ldo_dev Looking forward to that, especially the logo/text cases.
English
1
0
0
23