Peter

@hinge drop the damn API already. My clawdbot is starving

Cant wait to for the boys to vibe code google maps but for ranking public toilets

500 new users yesterday 🤥

@dams_app Give it a day. It’s a bug. You are fine brother man. If not and submit a ticket they will restore

Meta permanently banned my personal Facebook account of 7 years for “account integrity” for absolutely no valid reason. That account was linked to my business assets, so now I’m locked out of my Meta Business account, ad account, and developer access too. I submitted the appeal. They asked for a selfie video. It matched my profile. Seconds later: permanently banned. No real explanation. No human support. No way to fix it. How is this acceptable for people running actual businesses?

@kritikakodes Marketing

I am a Vibe coder, scare me with one word.🤔

Marketing is building without a debug console

speed watching movies is the new meta. Saw the spider-man trailer yesterday, and it was too late last night to re-watch a full movie, so I skipped all the boring stuff of no way home. got through it in 30 minutes and still cried when zendaya didnt remember who peter was at the end.

@aryanlabde Mostly yes. But for minimal tasks it doesn’t really matter. Mostly helpful to know how and which system are good for what. Or which packages are good for what

Hot take: Vibe coding only works well if you already know how to code.

Exactly. Figma’s becoming just asset storage now that Google’s AI vibe dropped. The real moat is the coordination layer after: ServiceNow-style AI Control Tower for SMBs using Claude + Cursor agents. Auto-sync Figma designs → Allspice updates → GitHub deploys with zero human handoffs. That’s the collaboration-to-coordination ratio that actually matters. Anyone building this for real businesses (not just crypto)?

JUST IN: Figma stock plunged -8% in one day after Google unveiled AI “vibe design” tool.

@romainrevert Come join the unemployed

Go fuck yourself

@sethsetse @a0_dev Unpopular opinion but it’s a good way to cut back on the sloppy apps that dilute out the quality apps in the App Store. Sucks for a users looking for an app that does X and you have to look through 50 junk vibe coded apps

The @a0_dev app got taken off the store 3 months ago and we made SEVERAL appeals with Apple to get it back to no avail. We've since gone with a different solution. A lot of people seem to have no idea what's really happening here so I want to share my thoughts. Apple removed our app and is blocking updates / releases to many other apps for Guideline 2.5.2, this guideline prohibits downloading and executing code inside of an app that changes features of functionality of the app. Our app and many other apps download the code for a users app so that it can be previewed on a users device with native capabilities. It's a matter of convenience, we want users to be able to download one app so that they can quickly test the many apps that they are building. There are many other ways for users to preview their mobile apps that are a much worse experience. The other options include TestFlight, previewing on the browser, using the Simulator on Mac, and downloading an ad-hoc build to a users device. Using TestFlight means users have to sign up for a $99 developer account and create a store listing just to upload their build just to test the app they're trying to build. It requires too much effort and money for new users who just want to try the app they've built and there's no way to let other people test the apps without adding them to your developer account or submitting your app for external TestFlight review which can add a multi day delay. Previewing the app on the browser is another popular solution with many problems. The browser preview is ugly and can't access native functionality. There are MANY features that don't work on the browser and the app doesn't look or behave the same as it does on an actual device. It's helpful for our users building apps on our website but doesn't test the real app. Ad-hoc builds needs to be signed for a user's device and require a very convoluted process to get the user's Device ID which include entering developer mode on your phone, a security delay from apple, and can also require a paid developer account if you want the builds to last longer than a few days. It's easy to see why we and many other vibe coding apps have chosen to allow users to instead download a single app and execute the code for their app inside of it. It reduces friction, saves money, and time. The 2.5.2 Guideline already has an exception for Educational apps and I think it should be extended to support Developer Tools. For Apple this is simply a matter of control, they want app developers to buy a Mac, download Xcode, and use the Simulator or TestFlight just to preview an app they're trying to build. There are many people who are seemingly happy about this and think that this will help improve their app review times or stop 'vibe-coded' apps from entering the app store. Those people are fools. The decision has nothing to do with the quality or volume of apps or how they are made. It's about how hard it is to test them. The only thing that will improve your app review times is Apple hiring more reviewers or relaxing the rules. Apple is a nearly $4 trillion company. Trust me, they can afford to hire more reviewers. Instead they've chosen to make the app testing process harder in an attempt to keep more control. We will continue making apps anyway.

@SaidAitmbarek And maybe an open claw to market for you

Don't overbuild your app. You only need 3 things: 1. One killer feature 2. A painful problem And the balls to charge $49/mo.

80 big sheckles to change the name from fb to meta

@novikoff @rive_app @cleanmymac This is clean brother

recreation of .@cleanmymac Cloud Cleanup Icon in .@rive_app full vector

@Polymarket Figma really just a spot to store assets nowadays

@consumerxai Any other formats that people have seen pick up traction on TikTok?

make tiktok money they said, build a app for couples they said... literally every single love/relationship app on Tiktok rn: Lovio - 42.8M views Lovelee - 21.8M views Loverzz - 21.2M views in 30 days UsTwo - 2.1M views, one acc Lovora - running on 47 accounts

@MacRumors TLDR: Apple doesn’t want mini app stores inside apps. If your app can generate & run new apps inside itself → rejected. If it pushes that experience to the web → you’re fine.

Apple Quietly Blocks Updates for Popular 'Vibe Coding' Apps macrumors.com/2026/03/18/app…

How clawdbot looks at me after completing guided set up

"Crude is below $100 again" "It's going lower" "No it's not" "Do you know anything about oil?" "No do you" "No"