AxellaCoin

282 posts

AxellaCoin banner
AxellaCoin

AxellaCoin

@AxellaCoin

Native Cardano token for decentralized research funding. Backing trials, empowering sites, and accelerating biotech equity.

Присоединился Nisan 2025
310 Подписки140 Подписчики
Закреплённый твит
AxellaCoin
AxellaCoin@AxellaCoin·
Clinical research is broken—reliant on slow grants and outdated VC models. We built AxellaCoin ($AXC) to provide decentralized, transparent funding that gets trials moving fast.
AxellaCoin tweet media
English
28
1
36
883
AxellaCoin ретвитнул
Cardano Foundation
Cardano Foundation@Cardano_CF·
2/ Visit the Cardano booth at Carrousel du Louvre, 15 and 16 April. The Foundation is there as part of the Unified Global Events Marketing Strategy, alongside @emurgo_io and @RareNetworkWeb3. Also around the Cardano booth, you will find representatives from projects across the ecosystem. Come by and meet @IntersectMBO, @IOGroup, @USDMOfficial, @MasumiNetwork, @SundialProtocol, @IagonOfficial, @libertum_token, @joyeoust, @zettacapital00, @YoramBenzvi, @w3bflix, @MrHunt, @phil_uplc, @trnznd, @ShadowbookMM, @anajov, @AdaFrog_Pool, @adosiawolf, @LandhiveRWA, @AxellaCoin, and @indigo_protocol. Come meet the teams, see what’s being built, and connect with the Cardano ecosystem.
Cardano Foundation tweet mediaCardano Foundation tweet mediaCardano Foundation tweet media
English
2
9
80
3.4K
AxellaCoin
AxellaCoin@AxellaCoin·
You are raising a very important structural point. Cardano staking is safe, liquid, and attractive which is a strength. But it means DApps must offer something more meaningful than passive yield to activate capital. That’s exactly why we are building around governance-driven capital formation where using ADA (and participating) unlocks real-world economic coordination, not just APR. Utility has to exceed staking, not compete with it.
English
1
0
1
20
TOMO | Japanese Investor
TOMO | Japanese Investor@TomoHappyRich·
カルダノでDapps開発をされている方へ。 日本のカルダノコミュニティは、ダイダロスやYoroiをはじめとするウォレットで長年ステーキングをしてきました。 自分自身、ずっとADAでステーキングを続けていた中で、カルダノ上でDeFiが出たときに正直怖くて使ってなかったです。ADAのステーキングはロックされないし、ノンカストディアルで所有権は自分にある。これがあるので、利回りが魅力的だとしてもDeFiを使おうと思う理由がございません。 皮肉な話、ADAのステーキングが魅力的すぎるからこそ、何かしらDAppsが出ても「このDApps使ってみたい」「ADAで何かしてみたい」という気持ちが湧いてこない。自分がそうだし、日本のコミュニティも全体的にそうなっていると思います。 日本人ホルダーの心理として、現状「ADAによるステーキングのリターン」>「魅力的なDAppsや日常で本当にADAを使いたくなる体験」という構図がある中で、これが逆転していかないと「ADAで何かしたい!」というモチベーションがなかなか湧いてこない、という本音があるはずです。 また、「ADAで買い物ができるようになる!」という動きに関しても正直なところ魅力的とは思えません。実際、日本人が日常で決済する上で現金やクレジットカードで十分だし(そもそもこの問題は暗号資産が日常の決済用途で普及するかという話につながるのでADAだけの問題ではないですが)、何より日本の税制ルールでは決済するたびに含み益分が課税されるので、ADAで何かを買いたいというモチベーションが正直薄いです。 自分は開発者のように何かを作ったりはできないのでこういうことを伝えることで精いっぱいなのですが、このポストが少しでもDApps開発の役に立てばという思いで書かせていただきました。 カルダノのDAppsに期待してる方はいいねで反応もらえたら嬉しいです🙏
日本語
8
8
75
13.1K
AxellaCoin
AxellaCoin@AxellaCoin·
Well said. Cutting NCL might defend optics short term, but it doesn’t create value. Ecosystem activation does. If we want sustainable $ADA appreciation, we need builders, real usage, and capital formation happening on-chain. Treasury exists to activate growth not to sit idle during a competitive market cycle. Long-term value needs to be the focus.
English
1
0
1
44
dori
dori@dori_coin·
I’m against lowering NCL further. This isn’t about wasting the treasury. If we want $ADA value and the treasury itself to be sustainable in the long run, ecosystem activation has to come first. Our community shouldn’t stay fixated on cutting NCL. So far, I’ve exercised governance over treasury spending in a fairly conservative way. You can check my voting history. At one point, I strongly opposed the $SNEK listing proposal in its early stage, and I’ve publicly argued that some Catalyst projects shouldn’t be funded. In short, I’ve been active in preventing unnecessary spending, and I believe waste should be blocked aggressively. At the same time, we can’t lower NCL so drastically that we choke off the very investments needed to activate the ecosystem. If Cardano were the only network in this market, then cutting treasury spending and reducing $ADA supply to defend the price might make sense. But that’s not reality. The entire market has entered a bearish phase, and token price declines are not unique to Cardano. Meanwhile, many blockchain foundations are still investing massive amounts of capital into ecosystem growth, nurturing builders, and constantly talking about “survival.” They understand how critical ecosystem investment is. We’re competing with other chains that are aggressively pushing ecosystem growth. Sitting back and just trusting in Cardano’s technical strengths, hoping people will eventually notice or appreciate its value, is honestly a pretty naive way to think about it. Compared to other chains, Cardano is still lacking in many areas. VC funding is limited, official support programs are scarce, and network transaction volume continues to decline. Cutting ecosystem investment in this situation will only reduce new builder inflow and the creation of new dApps, which could eventually lead to lower transaction volume and, in turn, weaken treasury revenue in a vicious cycle. There’s a lot of discussion about reducing treasury spending to lower $ADA inflation and defend the price. But there’s far less discussion about how to actually increase $ADA’s value. In reality, both price growth and price defense depend on the ecosystem. Investment outcomes don’t appear overnight. Many builders and dApps fail. Still, they must be given the opportunity to try, along with a better development environment. Cardano’s consensus algorithm, protocol, developer experience, and ecosystem investment are not optional. They’re essential. Cardano’s future doesn’t depend on cutting treasury spending, but on how effectively we activate the ecosystem. We shouldn’t obsess over short-term results. We need to focus on creating sustainable long-term value.
Cardano YOD₳@JaromirTesar

Many people argue that 300M NCL is still high. If this is to change, someone needs to submit a proposal. Investments in the ecosystem are generally healthy and even necessary in a competitive environment. Cardano needs to invest in both the protocol and ecosystem development. We lack quality in key decision-making processes. We approved funding for projects that have not yet brought any value to the ecosystem. Some are even rug-pulled. We naively think that a dance party or a meetup with a budget of 20K ADA will lead us to success. Where did the enthusiasm for the decentralized revolution go? In 2017, people did meetups for free because they saw a vision of a better future. Projects that are to receive funding must be selected carefully. We must not duplicate efforts and build the same thing 3 times without at least 1 team delivering a complete solution. I understand that people are upset. On the other hand, setting the NCL to 50M ADA and thus essentially stopping spending for builders is not the best direction. This will not help Cardano fulfill its long-term vision. If we increase the quality of the decision-making process, we can have a lower NCL while strategically investing in development. The reality is this: If some gov members do not have time to decide even on a simple proposal that is important for devs, let's not expect quality decisions on more complex proposals. Let's fix governance first. Then we can decide on spending.

English
10
6
50
7.2K
AxellaCoin
AxellaCoin@AxellaCoin·
This is exactly the direction and fundamentals we are building upon. We grow TVL by anchoring real-world clinical trial capital on Cardano — treasury reserves, governance-locked tokens, vendor settlement balances, and patient engagement flows that stay on-chain because they’re operationally required, not yield-chasing. Users + transactions + purpose-driven TVL.
English
0
0
0
84
Cardanians (CRDN)
Cardanians (CRDN)@Cardanians_io·
Charles Hoskinson: Cardano is strong. 🔥 "Decentralization and great tech aren't enough. To win, we need users, transactions, and TVL and we can get there." From the Midnight tour in Japan 🇯🇵
English
19
31
306
8.3K
AxellaCoin
AxellaCoin@AxellaCoin·
@Sssebi Bear markets are where real conviction shows. We are building on Cardano for the long game; not the next candle.
English
0
0
0
190
Sssebi🦁
Sssebi🦁@Sssebi·
Are there any $ADA bulls left around here? All I get is hate and bearishness in my comments. I guess 90% will be missing out
English
182
25
755
17.3K
AxellaCoin
AxellaCoin@AxellaCoin·
@dori_coin @cardano_gourmet Completely agree. We are building in healthcare where execution, not ideology, determines adoption. Cardano’s strengths only matter if they’re pulled into real workflows.
English
0
0
1
17
Gourmet
Gourmet@cardano_gourmet·
2026 is make or break for Cardano. The hard truth: the tech phase is largely done, and it was done right. Cardano has some of the strongest foundations in crypto. And as we know, markets don’t reward foundations. They reward usage, revenue, and visibility. After listening to recent interviews from SUI and SOL founders, the contrast is brutal: relentless focus on adoption, institutions, and business execution. Cardano chose rigor, values, and governance first. That was necessary. It built trust. Now the Pentad must execute a hard pivot: sales, partnerships, marketing, distribution. Turn great tech into demand. ADA price matters. Without price strength, builders leave and confidence fades. I’m still invested because Cardano already solved the hardest problem: real tech. What’s missing is business execution. The Pentad needs to make brutal decisions, and honestly, handing this to someone new, obsessed with growth and sales, might be the only way forward.
English
3
2
22
453
AxellaCoin ретвитнул
LIBERTUM
LIBERTUM@libertum_token·
@AxellaCoin Early Pharma and MedDev on-chain will change the Healthcare for the better. You have @libertum_token support!!
English
0
1
2
24
AxellaCoin
AxellaCoin@AxellaCoin·
@atriumlab @DraperDragon Excited for this space. Question: if the objective is adoption and ecosystem maturity, why cap external LP capital at ~$5M? Was a co-investment or matching-capital structure considered to bring more outside capital into Cardano alongside Treasury funds?
English
0
1
2
52
Atrium Lab | atrium.io
Atrium Lab | atrium.io@atriumlab·
During our next X Space Wednesday Jan. 21st, we'll be joined by Samiz Bayan, partner at @DraperDragon! We'll be talking about their upcoming US$80M governance info-action about scaling Cardano adoption over the next several years. Do you have any questions? Post them below!
Atrium Lab | atrium.io tweet media
English
74
71
75
11.4K
AxellaCoin
AxellaCoin@AxellaCoin·
Cardano has proven decentralized governance works. AXC asks the next question: What if we applied it to science? Our Fund15 proposal adapts Catalyst’s governance stack to enable transparent, global biotech collaboration—where contributions, reviews, and decisions are recorded on-chain. This is DeSci with structure. 🔗 projectcatalyst.io/funds/15/carda… #Cardano #DeSci #AXC
AxellaCoin tweet media
English
0
1
3
40
AxellaCoin
AxellaCoin@AxellaCoin·
@libertum_token Agree. Shared infrastructure is what allows serious, long-term builders to thrive. This closely aligns with how we’re approaching real-world use cases at AxellaCoin. Excited to see this capability come online on Cardano.
English
1
0
3
33
AxellaCoin ретвитнул
LIBERTUM
LIBERTUM@libertum_token·
Infrastructure enables others to build. For regulated real-world assets, enablement means providing a solid base: shared infrastructure for identity, permissioning, lifecycle management, and governance-aware compliance. Libertum’s Catalyst proposal focuses on enabling that layer on Cardano, so other projects can build with confidence and longevity. @Cardano_CF
LIBERTUM tweet media
English
6
8
32
661
AxellaCoin ретвитнул
YUTA-Cardano/CPA(DMは全て詐欺)
I used AI to filter 508 Catalyst proposals based on the criteria below, and as a result, all 508 were classified as NO. The individual reasons for each rejection are documented in a spreadsheet. Am I holding unrealistic expectations? Does the proposal define KPIs that are causally linked to verifiable value creation on the Cardano mainnet, with explicit numeric targets and measurable adoption quality (retention, frequency, production use)? 1. KPIs are limited to views, reach, engagement, uptime, API calls, or accuracy→ No demonstrated causal link to on-chain behavior 2. On-chain KPIs are mentioned, but→ numeric targets are missing, or sustained / production usage cannot be measured 3. Success conditions allow→ one-off or purely formal usage, making success indistinguishable from failure
English
24
4
60
3.3K
AxellaCoin
AxellaCoin@AxellaCoin·
@atriumlab Pitching “AXC: Decentralized Biotech Collaboration Network on Cardano” — governance-first, community-driven clinical research funding. 🔗 app.projectcatalyst.io/proposal/019a8… Please feel free to reach out with any questions and look forward to your support.
English
0
0
1
21