Money4Nothing 🇮🇱🇺🇸

Holy f*ck. Word for word. Ana Kasaparian (Extreme Left Wing) and Nick Fuentes (Extreme Right Wing) paint themselves as polar opposites on the political spectrum. However, listen to them here, side by side. This is horseshoe theory on fully display.

Normal, sane, people on X need to come to grips with the following reality The people getting the clicks on X are largely driven by foreign accounts trying to promote extreme points of views It happened when the left controlled Twitter, it's happening now when the right is dominant What this means is that many Americans on the left have been radicalized to think that men can be women and that cops want to kill black people...it also means many Americans on the right have been radicalized to be antisemitic and to think isolationism is the way forward So if you're still here, try to find sane people, unswayed by engagement, to give you honest takes on what's happening...otherwise you're just joining a cult

@alono88 לא לא לא. אני לא משתמש בסקילז ובשום דבר. ה-capacity של המנוי שלי בקלוד התכווץ בשבועיים האחרונים בצורה משמעותית ביותר. בקלות בפקטור של 3-6x. וכן, קודקס עובד נהדר.

- מתחילים לעבוד עם קלודקוד - שמחים מהביצועים הנהדרים - מוסיפים סקילז ו-MCP שממלאים לו את הקונטקסט עוד לפני שהשיחה התחילה - מייצרים לו זכרונות סותרים שממלאים את הקונטקסט ומבלבלים את המודל בפועל - מאוכזבים מהדעיכה בביצועים - מתחילים לעבוד עם קודקס - שמחים ומופתעים מהביצועים הנהדרים

@taltimes2 מי שלא מבין את הפיתרון שיקרא את מדריך הטרמפיסט לגלקסיה

הפיתרון שלי למי שרוצה ספויילר ... ... ... נסמן את התשובה ב- x. בוודאות נבצע לפחות זריקה אחת. לאחריה: בהסתברות חמש שישיות לא יצא שש, ואנחנו חוזרים למצב ההתחלתי, כלומר מצפים לעוד x זריקות בממוצע. בהסתברות שישית יצא שש, ואז אנחנו במצב חדש: יש לנו כבר שש אחד, ומחכים לעוד אחד. מהמצב הזה נזרוק שוב: בהסתברות שישית נקבל עוד שש וסיימנו. בהסתברות חמש שישיות הרצף נשבר, וחוזרים להתחלה, כלומר שוב מצפים ל- x זריקות. עכשיו נכתוב את מה שכתבתי בחשבונאית: x=1+⅚x+⅙(1+⅚x) והפתרון הוא 🥁🥁🥁 42 😍

אז הפעם חידה. מתמטיקה של בית ספר, אבל לא קלה. התשובה מאוד אסתטית 😉 אני מרשה להריץ סימולציה במחשב... זורקים קובייה אחת רגילה וסופרים את מספר הזריקות. כמה זריקות צריך, בממוצע, כדי לקבל שש ואז מיד אחריו עוד שש?

People forget this part of history. Israel defeated Egypt in war and then gave back the entire Sinai Peninsula - an area bigger than Israel itself - in exchange for peace. Israel withdrew from Gaza completely in 2005, removing its own settlements and citizens. Parts of the West Bank were handed over to Palestinian governance under the Oslo Accords. The Golan Heights wasn’t returned because Syria never made peace and the area overlooks northern Israel strategically. So the narrative that Israel just “occupies land and never gives anything back” is simply not true. Land was returned where peace was possible. Land was held where war was still the reality. That’s not ideology. That’s strategy and survival.

🇮🇱🇮🇷 An American pilot with 25 years of experience, a veteran of three wars and hundreds of combat sorties, spoke about Israeli military pilots. He published a post that quickly went viral: “I’ve flown over Iraq, Afghanistan, and Libya. I thought I had seen everything. But when I saw what the Israeli Air Force is doing in Iran, I realized I’m still a student. Precision. Logistics. 200 aircraft in one night. 500 targets. 1,500 kilometers. No aerial refueling from American bases. All the fuel from home. All the weapons from home. It’s like flying from Miami to New York, bombing targets along the way, and returning— while 200 aircraft move simultaneously without a single collision. To the Israeli pilots: You are not just the best in the Middle East. You are the best in the world. And that’s the final word.”

Iran was trying to use the North Korean model to get a nuke: create sufficient conventional deterrence so you won’t be challenged in acquiring one (it’s called the Seoul Hostage Problem). This has been explained over and over since day one. Everyone claiming shifting goalposts or no imminent threat has been lying. The reason North Korea was allowed to get nukes is because Seoul (and its 10 million inhabitants) is within artillery and rocket range of North Korea. During the 1994 nuclear crisis, the Clinton administration seriously considered airstrikes on North Korea’s Yongbyon reactor but backed off precisely because of the artillery threat to Seoul. Iran was trying to accomplish the same by stockpiling missiles and drones which would have had the same deterrent effect. The proof is what Iran has been doing in the past month: attacking all its neighbors in order to pressure the US to stop attacking it Beyond this, they were building medium-range ballistic missiles that could reach Paris and London, meaning all of Europe could be held hostage as they built a nuclear bomb. The reason Iran has not built a nuclear weapon until now is not because it couldn’t, but because it knew it would be attacked and denied this capability. So by allowing them to continue developing this conventional deterrence, you would be allowing Iran to get a nuclear weapon. And unlike North Korea, Iran is led by an eschatological death cult Reagan saw nuclear mutually assured destruction (MAD) as both morally bankrupt (because of the innocent-body-count problem) and dangerously fragile because it assumed flawless rationality between adversaries…this means it only takes one irrational actor to destroy the world. Working backwards from the conclusion that Iran’s Islamist regime must never have a nuclear weapon, it was necessary for the US to attack Iran to deny it the conventional capacity to hold the entire eastern hemisphere hostage. Every European leader knows this and behind the scenes praises the US for this action. But they are cowards, held hostage by their own internal Muslim populations, and so adopt these ridiculous public positions. This was never about Israel. And if your argument is that Iran should be allowed to get a nuclear weapon then you are a fool and a traitor to western civilization…you’re a useful idiot

If you can't see the difference between terrorists who behead babies, celebrate it, and hide behind their own children to avoid consequence, and soldiers who attempt to avoid civilian casualties, you are not "morally sophisticated." You are a fool, and a dangerous fool at that.

🇰🇼 🇮🇱 Rare moment of truth at the UN from brave Kuwaiti dissident @JJJuraid, invited by UN Watch: “Mr. Chair, I heard the term “colonizers.” But who are the real colonizers? A Jewish Kingdom ruled in Judea for a thousand years. We, the Arabs, took this land. Who Arabized Egyptians, Phoenicians, Persians and Amazighs? It was us, the Arabs. So why does the council enshrine a lie by keeping a permanent agenda item on Palestine, while ignoring the indigenous heart of Israel returning home? Let us be clear about who is actually defending our sovereignty. Today, Israel is a fighter for peaceful nations, freeing Gaza from Hamas terrorists and saving Iranians from the Islamic Republic. What Israel is doing to the IRGC — stopping a genocidal regime from acquiring nuclear weapons — is a gift to humanity. There are 57 Islamic countries and only one Jewish state, Israel. Despite the ongoing hateful desire to eliminate it, Israel has not only survived, it has thrived. I don’t believe in miracles, but this is one. So I ask the UN: when will you end the ritual of condemning Israel? Is it not time, instead, to learn from Israel? How to defeat terror, defend free societies, and pursue peace. Thank you.” What a refreshing act of integrity and truth. Stay connected, follow @MOSSADil.

Bert Stephens in NYT today: “For once, we fight with an equal ally”. ⸻ Bret Stephens Opinion Columnist For most of the postwar era, the United States has gone to war with partners whose military contributions ranged from moderately helpful to mainly symbolic. Britain in Afghanistan and Iraq comes to mind in the first case. Germany in the 1999 Kosovo war comes to mind in the second. The war against Iran is different. As of Monday, Central Command reports that the United States had struck over 7,000 targets inside Iran. Israel, for its part, had carried out some 7,600 strikes, according to a representative of the Israeli military. This may be the first time since the Second World War that Washington has had an equal partner with which to share the burdens of war. That’s a good starting point from which to consider the claim that the U.S. war with Iran is really a war for Israel. Past administrations have, in fact, gone to war for other countries. In the early 1990s, we went to war in the Persian Gulf for the sake of freeing Kuwait and defending Saudi Arabia — two countries that couldn’t defend themselves — from Iraq. Later that decade, we went to war in the Balkans after Europe proved shamefully unable to police its own neighborhood. In both cases, American presidents believed they were serving the national interest. But the military helplessness of our allies was a major factor in the decision to intervene. As for Israel, the charge that the United States has gone to war for it isn’t new. In 1990, Patrick Buchanan insisted that the only groups in favor of a war against Saddam Hussein over his invasion of Kuwait were “the Israeli Defense Ministry and its amen corner in the United States.” (That amen corner, Buchanan later indicated, consisted of the columnists A.M. Rosenthal and Charles Krauthammer, the defense expert Richard Perle and Henry Kissinger, the former secretary of state. Spot the commonality.) Opponents of the later Iraq war also spun a tale that the Bush administration was mostly doing Israel’s bidding. And on Tuesday, Joe Kent, a top adviser to Tulsi Gabbard, the director of national intelligence, announced his resignation over what he called a war started “due to pressure from Israel and its powerful American lobby.” In the case of Iran, the idea that crippling its capacity to threaten its neighbors is some sort of purely Israeli interest is belied by every Iranian missile or drone that falls on Dubai, Doha, Manama or Riyadh, not to mention U.S. and NATO military bases in the region. In October 2024, Kamala Harris called Iran our “greatest adversary,” adding that one of her “highest priorities” as president would be to ensure that Iran never became a nuclear power. Was she, also, just another of Benjamin Netanyahu’s little stooges — a manipulated American politician with no mind of her own? That charge is now being leveled at Donald Trump, never mind that the president first expressed a desire to thwack the Iranian regime in 1980, during the hostage crisis at the U.S. Embassy in Tehran, and repeated the point over decades. Whatever one thinks about the wisdom or the timing of Trump’s decision to go to war, it was, plainly, his decision — one for which he needed little convincing from Netanyahu or, for that matter, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman of Saudi Arabia, who, The Times reports, is urging Trump to “keep hitting the Iranians hard.” It is of course true that Israel greatly benefits from Trump’s courageous decision to join the war. Also true is that U.S. and Israeli interests, goals and tactics don’t perfectly overlap and sometimes conflict. That’s always the case whenever allies go to war. But the central point is that Israel, population 10 million, is behaving as an equal partner to America, population 342 million, in a war that the elected leadership of both countries believe is in their respective national interests. Whatever else that is, it isn’t the tail wagging the dog.

$LQDA is the real deal! Only a matter of time…

@idonas11 @PaulAll95402077 $LQDA would need to meet with the FDA and get a path forward. It would probably mean some sort of comparative study but hard for me to say.

@DeepValuePlay @PaulAll95402077 does the exclusivity get challenged formally at the fda by the competitor(s)? how does this work?

$LQDA RH says it here. RJ will repeat it, after the judge does what's right. $UTHR IPF exclusivity will be mist.

@PaulAll95402077 @idonas11 Exclusivity remains only for drugs that can’t prove they are clinically superior. If there’s a much better drug, exclusivity goes off the window.

@PaulAll95402077 @idonas11 $LQDA Let me be clear. $UTHR exclusivity for IPF is worthless. Exclusivity is broken if Yutrepia proves clinical superiority. I believe there should be ample proof both with cough and with titrability to conclude clinical superiority.

@outsanest @ShadySci @oposkiller @petricor80 @CDe_Gasperis $LODE board doesn’t care about LODE shareholders. They hold more stock in SSOF than in LODE. Sad but true.

@ShadySci @DeepValuePlay @oposkiller @petricor80 @CDe_Gasperis That is cute. So he dilutes LOAD shareholders by 40% in order to get money for SSOF, then gives that money to SSOF to as a bridge loan that would pay next to nothing to LOAD. Shouldn't BOD get a say as to how LOAD money being spent in order to protect the shareholders.

$LODE @CDe_Gasperis has not provided many details, but he has confirmed the evidence that part of the capital increase was aimed at increasing the value of SSOF in order to subsequently obtain a much greater profit.

@oposkiller @petricor80 @CDe_Gasperis Yep, my concern is that they’ll define it as a bridge loan, give $LODE a bit of interest but no additional equity. CEO is so shady.

@petricor80 @CDe_Gasperis oh, can you help me find a source for that? In the last 10K they disclosed 17% and i havent seen any updates since that

@MarkHope430820 @JoshYoung I know because I live there and recognize the video. It doesn’t show anything if you understand what you’re seeing because: 1) if missiles are aimed at “open areas” Israel doesn’t even attempt to intercept. 2) many of the “landings” in the video are actually debris.

@DeepValuePlay @JoshYoung How do you know it’s from June 2025? And it does NOT show 86% interception rate. Just look at how many are landing.

The Iron Dome with anti-rocket lasers is a modern day miracle.

@MarkHope430820 @JoshYoung This video is from June 2025… Very different situation, and also back then there was a 86% interception success.

@JoshYoung Here’s a different video:

$LODE so as expected the Lyon County BOCC approved the CUP for Microsoft’s Nighthawk. This increases the value of not just SSOF but ALL neighboring land. The substation is classified as a “regional hub”. Lyon County will soon be on par with Reno/Tahoe.