Derimot no

20K posts

Derimot no banner
Derimot no

Derimot no

@Derimot_no

Nettsted med flere personer i redaksjonen som publiserer artikler daglig om forskjellige temaer om politikk, helse, økonomi og krig.

Norway Присоединился Mayıs 2023
219 Подписки896 Подписчики
Derimot no
Derimot no@Derimot_no·
@pn_warner Ohhh.... Is it you Mark Micro Levin, with a burner-account?
English
0
0
0
13
David Frum
David Frum@davidfrum·
If you wonder why Europeans flinch from helping US in Gulf - in January, NATO allies were seriously preparing for a US sneak attack on Greenland, planning to blow up runways to prevent a Trump re-enactment of Putin's failed strike on Kyiv.
Orla Joelsen@OJoelsen

Denmark prepared for a possible U.S. attack: Flew blood supplies to Greenland and planned to blow up runways Key sources in Denmark and Europe are now revealing for the first time what happened during the most critical days, when Donald Trump threatened to take Greenland “the hard way.” When Danish soldiers were rapidly deployed to Greenland in January this year, they brought explosives with them. The plan was to destroy runways in Nuuk and Kangerlussuaq to prevent American military aircraft from landing troops on the island, should the U.S. president ultimately decide to seize Greenland by force. They also transported blood supplies from Danish blood banks so wounded personnel could be treated in case of combat. This is reported by DR, which over the past year has spoken with central sources in the Danish government, top military officers, and high-ranking officials and intelligence sources in Denmark, France, and Germany. All sources have played—and continue to play—key roles in the international crisis triggered by the United States’ demand for control over Greenland. Together, the sources describe an unprecedented year marked by sleepless nights. None of them had concrete intelligence of specific American attack plans against Greenland. Still, many feared in January that the historically important ally, the United States, could attack at any moment. At the same time, Denmark reached out to its European allies, leading to closer cooperation. “With the Greenland crisis, Europe realized once and for all that we must be able to handle our own security,” said a French senior official involved in the intense period. A rapid-response force consisting of Danish, French, German, Norwegian, and Swedish soldiers was first deployed to Nuuk and Kangerlussuaq. Shortly after, a main force followed, including: -Soldiers from the Danish Dragoon Regiment in Holstebro -Elite troops from the Jaeger Corps -French alpine troops trained for cold and mountainous warfare At the same time, Danish fighter jets and a French naval vessel were sent to the North Atlantic. According to several sources, the goal of having multinational troops on the ground was to ensure that any U.S. attempt to take Greenland would require a large-scale hostile action—thereby deterring such an attempt. “We have not been in such a situation since April 1940,” said a Danish defense source, referring to the days before Denmark’s occupation during World War II. Unlike in 1940, when Denmark chose not to resist militarily, the government and defense leadership this time decided—after extensive confidential discussions—to take the opposite approach: If the U.S. attempted an attack, Danish forces would be armed and ready to fight. Danish F-35 fighter jets deployed north were also fully armed. All this despite the understanding that Denmark could not realistically withstand a U.S. military attack. “The cost for the U.S. had to be raised. The U.S. would have to carry out a hostile act to take Greenland,” said a senior Danish defense source. Source: DR

English
535
2K
8.1K
516.2K
Derimot no
Derimot no@Derimot_no·
@littl3gr33nman @davidfrum No. you are wrong. Again. The bodies arrived 2 days after that the mayor regained controll of the city. When the bodies lied there in the streets, the Russian forces had left city 2 days before. So, was it small green men or Ukrainian forces that placed the bodies there?
English
1
0
0
7
Derimot no
Derimot no@Derimot_no·
@FirasHamda2 @davidfrum The Russians forces did the mission. They succeded. They withdrew when the long convoy withdrew. The job was done. And no, we are not gone start a new topic. If you have nothing more to say regarding Hostomel, well then we are done.
English
1
0
0
6
Firas Bu Hamdan
Firas Bu Hamdan@FirasHamda2·
@Derimot_no @davidfrum How come the Russians aren't there if they "won"?:) And you didn't answer,what were the Russians doing in Irpin if they "weren't trying to take Kyiv"?:) We're still in the same topic:)
English
1
0
0
11
Derimot no
Derimot no@Derimot_no·
We reported it in our newspaper. The fact remain even though you play ignorant: The Bucha mayor held a speech in his office the day he gained contoll over the city. He didn't say a word about bodies in the streets. That's quite understandable: There where none. 2 days later, the bodies appeared in the streets.
English
1
0
0
5
LittleGreenMan
LittleGreenMan@littl3gr33nman·
@Derimot_no @davidfrum You're full of shit, he announced liberation on the phone when everything wasn't clear yet. Why should he mention bodies? There are 100s of hours of all kinds of recordings and 100s of witnesses
English
1
0
0
6
Derimot no
Derimot no@Derimot_no·
You are wrong. We saw the news on TV when it happened. Including a woman doing a stand-up in front of the destroyed Antonov 225. Saying (and we could hear) there are gunfights across the corner (of the building). Russian soldiers won the fight. The ukrainians lost. It's so cute of you to shift topic when you have run into the wall regarding Hostomel.
English
1
0
0
10
Firas Bu Hamdan
Firas Bu Hamdan@FirasHamda2·
@Derimot_no @davidfrum The Ukrainians destroyed it not the Russians 😂 Also,if that was the case,what were the Russians doing in bucha and Irpin?:)
English
1
0
0
10
Derimot no
Derimot no@Derimot_no·
@FirasHamda2 @davidfrum Your guess is wrong. Russian forces took the airport to destroy it. - To make a hinder for the Kiev-regime. They succeded in doing that.
English
1
0
0
5
Firas Bu Hamdan
Firas Bu Hamdan@FirasHamda2·
@Derimot_no @davidfrum I did,they wanted to use it as a bridge to Kyiv,that's why they were fighting there,for the same reason they took bucha and for the same reason they were fighting in Irpin:)
English
1
0
0
8
Derimot no
Derimot no@Derimot_no·
Yes, we published articles telling that. The most important fact is that the mayor held a speech in his office when he gained controll of the city, and he didn't say a word about bodies in the streets. It was 2 days later, that the bodies where there. Placed there - by ukrainians.
English
1
0
0
8
Derimot no
Derimot no@Derimot_no·
@FirasHamda2 @davidfrum No. But why didn't you guess the right answer? The right answer is this: The objective was to take out the airport. And they succeded.
English
1
0
0
7
Derimot no
Derimot no@Derimot_no·
@littl3gr33nman @davidfrum There is a fact that some people died in Bucha, but they were killed by Ukrainian forces. Some of the bodies in the streets were crisis actors.
English
2
0
0
7
Derimot no
Derimot no@Derimot_no·
@FirasHamda2 @davidfrum The answer to that is something that we have said earlier to day. But for you in the back: To take out the airport. As they succeded in doing.
English
1
0
0
6
Firas Bu Hamdan
Firas Bu Hamdan@FirasHamda2·
@Derimot_no @davidfrum "what were they doing there" is a rhetorical question in my part,I wanted to hear from you "what were they doing there" in your opinion?:)
English
1
0
0
4
Derimot no
Derimot no@Derimot_no·
@littl3gr33nman @davidfrum You are naive when you prove that you believe that you can Gaslight us. We know the truth. We told you the truth. There were no bodies in the streets of Bucha when Russia handed the city back to the mayor.
English
1
0
0
6
LittleGreenMan
LittleGreenMan@littl3gr33nman·
@Derimot_no @davidfrum 100s of hours of footage often from multiple angles and witness statements vs empty russian propaganda Just how naive are you?
English
1
0
0
4