Post

David Frum
David Frum@davidfrum·
If you wonder why Europeans flinch from helping US in Gulf - in January, NATO allies were seriously preparing for a US sneak attack on Greenland, planning to blow up runways to prevent a Trump re-enactment of Putin's failed strike on Kyiv.
Orla Joelsen@OJoelsen

Denmark prepared for a possible U.S. attack: Flew blood supplies to Greenland and planned to blow up runways Key sources in Denmark and Europe are now revealing for the first time what happened during the most critical days, when Donald Trump threatened to take Greenland “the hard way.” When Danish soldiers were rapidly deployed to Greenland in January this year, they brought explosives with them. The plan was to destroy runways in Nuuk and Kangerlussuaq to prevent American military aircraft from landing troops on the island, should the U.S. president ultimately decide to seize Greenland by force. They also transported blood supplies from Danish blood banks so wounded personnel could be treated in case of combat. This is reported by DR, which over the past year has spoken with central sources in the Danish government, top military officers, and high-ranking officials and intelligence sources in Denmark, France, and Germany. All sources have played—and continue to play—key roles in the international crisis triggered by the United States’ demand for control over Greenland. Together, the sources describe an unprecedented year marked by sleepless nights. None of them had concrete intelligence of specific American attack plans against Greenland. Still, many feared in January that the historically important ally, the United States, could attack at any moment. At the same time, Denmark reached out to its European allies, leading to closer cooperation. “With the Greenland crisis, Europe realized once and for all that we must be able to handle our own security,” said a French senior official involved in the intense period. A rapid-response force consisting of Danish, French, German, Norwegian, and Swedish soldiers was first deployed to Nuuk and Kangerlussuaq. Shortly after, a main force followed, including: -Soldiers from the Danish Dragoon Regiment in Holstebro -Elite troops from the Jaeger Corps -French alpine troops trained for cold and mountainous warfare At the same time, Danish fighter jets and a French naval vessel were sent to the North Atlantic. According to several sources, the goal of having multinational troops on the ground was to ensure that any U.S. attempt to take Greenland would require a large-scale hostile action—thereby deterring such an attempt. “We have not been in such a situation since April 1940,” said a Danish defense source, referring to the days before Denmark’s occupation during World War II. Unlike in 1940, when Denmark chose not to resist militarily, the government and defense leadership this time decided—after extensive confidential discussions—to take the opposite approach: If the U.S. attempted an attack, Danish forces would be armed and ready to fight. Danish F-35 fighter jets deployed north were also fully armed. All this despite the understanding that Denmark could not realistically withstand a U.S. military attack. “The cost for the U.S. had to be raised. The U.S. would have to carry out a hostile act to take Greenland,” said a senior Danish defense source. Source: DR

English
505
1.9K
7.9K
495.7K
Thomas Bate
Thomas Bate@tjbate2000·
Greenland is a total perpetual money black hole for Denmark and Europe. Should have jumped at the chance to sell to Trump. But the entire European political establishment only cares about...what? Why is not selling Greenland to Trump, ever, at any price, a worthy objective for Denmark and Europe? Could use the money in Ukraine.
English
9
1
2
1.3K
Gandalv
Gandalv@Microinteracti1·
That’s the alliance now. Danish planners quietly mapping how to blow up their own runways before an American president could use them. Not against Russia. Against Washington. And in the same breath, Trump expects these same Europeans to follow him into the Strait of Hormuz. The logic doesn’t hold together. One moment Europe is the enemy. The next moment Europe is the cavalry. A mind that can hold both thoughts simultaneously without noticing the contradiction is not a mind running a coherent foreign policy. Europe is waiting. Counting down the years, hoping America finds its way back to itself before the damage becomes permanent. Because from where Europe stands, there is now exactly one fully functioning country left in the Western Hemisphere. Canada. The rest – including the United States – looks increasingly like what Americans used to call a banana republic. Corrupt institutions, captured courts, pharmaceutical addiction normalized at a national scale, and a political class that has made lying a professional requirement. Europeans don’t say this loudly. But they think it every time they watch the news.
English
25
62
385
9.8K
Derimot no
Derimot no@Derimot_no·
@davidfrum Russia didn't even try for one second to take Kiev.
English
21
1
3
2.6K
Epistemic Trespasser3
Epistemic Trespasser3@colonialbot3·
@davidfrum the fact that they took this so seriously as to do all this and dont take a nuclear iran seriously is why they cannot be trusted as allies or be given equal footing as decision makers ever again, david.
English
28
5
260
5.4K
Skeptical
Skeptical@SkepticalShash·
@davidfrum @grok - is this a proven fact or just more clickbait from neocons?
English
1
0
0
1.3K
victor
victor@vijayan84911·
@davidfrum NATO allies prepping to sabotage their own turf against us really shows how deep the trust got shattered. Hard to ask for Gulf backup after that.
English
3
0
10
1.4K
Tim R
Tim R@TimRRich·
@davidfrum @grok are they serious with this reporting? I find it foolish to think we would ever do what they accuse us of under any condition.
English
1
0
0
23
Donald Benjamin
Donald Benjamin@donniebenjamin·
@davidfrum I agree that Trump has done serious damage to relations with European countries (tariffs, Greenland, Ukraine, etc). My question is this: why aren't European countries willing to help for the sake for their own good? Closure of the Strait of Hormuz hurts Europe more than the US.
English
28
1
6
4.6K
Davidicvs
Davidicvs@davidbwade·
@davidfrum I don't know how serious it was. Looked more performative than anything.
English
1
0
0
327
Just Sayin’ 🇺🇲 ✝️ ❤️
@davidfrum We honestly have ZERO QUESTIONS regarding "European military" or "NATO allies" in America Don't really CARE about something that DOESN'T REALLY EXIST 🤡👇
Just Sayin’ 🇺🇲 ✝️ ❤️ tweet media
English
2
2
12
189
E.D. Kelley
E.D. Kelley@ParalaxView·
@davidfrum NATO the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. Iran is approximately 1,950 miles (3,140 km) from the nearest point of the North Atlantic Ocean.
English
0
0
0
215
Jonathan Hale
Jonathan Hale@jonathan2hale·
@davidfrum @yarotrof From the Gulf, this won’t be forgotten. When missiles were flying, European partners largely sat on their hands, clutching their pearls. That’s not neutrality. It will be seen, over time, as a betrayal.
English
4
0
2
467
🔫 Entropy’s Beard ⚓️
@davidfrum No Dave… The facts aren’t with you here. Over half the British navy is in refit or repair. They have neither the capability of defending Greenland or themselves for that matter
English
0
0
8
146
Jean Granville
Jean Granville@Granville1977·
@davidfrum Yes but precisely, they should be asking for a settlement on Greenland or for other things in exchange for their assistance. Right now, they're literally inviting Trump to take revenge later, and we will all pay, just because it's popular to push back against the US.
English
5
0
1
1.3K
Colleen Critoph
Colleen Critoph@MssCee·
@davidfrum True, but additionally, the peril that Trump has unleashed in this war is completely unnecessary. Gabbard admitted under oath yesterday there was no nuclear threat, and Iran had agreed to substantial terms in the international talks in Oman the week of the bombing .
English
4
1
32
4.2K
ciclones
ciclones@ciclones13·
Two things: A - if the US was going to “sneak attack” Greenland (lol) there isn’t a damn thing Europe could have done about it. As evidenced by the pittance of a deployment they did. B - the US was never going to attack Greenland. As evidenced by the absolute lack of military assets anywhere near Greenland. The US wanted more military coverage of Greenland. But wanted Europe to do it. Since we’re busy protecting the rest of our fucking joint interests.
English
0
0
0
37
nthngbtx
nthngbtx@ianwe11·
@davidfrum And that did not happen. Considering they know we don't have to land on a runway to do what we want it makes Europe look even more pathetic.
English
1
0
1
174
therealDG
therealDG@DGinOTC·
@davidfrum How long before Trump tries to block funding for Ukraine to spite them?
English
2
0
1
1.1K
Christopher_Levich
Christopher_Levich@HeroShack·
@davidfrum Were they? They sent like - 12 soldiers and trained for a few days. NATO allies? Seriously?
English
2
0
1
701
Stephen
Stephen@dfinn4·
@davidfrum I don’t even know where to begin with this post. You either have the world view of a child or you’re an excellent grifter. I can’t tell which
English
0
0
0
14
John ⚓️
John ⚓️@Stoker235·
@davidfrum And Canada 🇨🇦 was part of this exercise
John ⚓️ tweet media
English
0
0
2
102
Jonathan Glicksberg
Jonathan Glicksberg@jglicksberg·
Still, European leadership with another flawed strategy. They were so eager to say no to Trump. In reality, there was very little help they could provide so just saying yes would have kept the US on their side. Now the given Trump the ammunition he needs to abandon NATO, the Ukraine etc. they weren’t there for us when we needed them …
English
1
0
1
216
SNAFUPERMAN
SNAFUPERMAN@SNAFUPERMAN·
@davidfrum “Helping us”… It’s their tankers stuck in the SoH. So not helping us literally costing them half of their oil and gas, and crushing their economy. They talked tough, but multiple nations are already talking about sending ships but saying it’s separate from US to save face. 😆
English
2
0
0
63
Dennis Connolly
Dennis Connolly@Deconn·
@davidfrum Reminds me of the movie (60s, I think), "The Mouse That Roared". Almost comical.
English
0
0
0
141
X Files
X Files@citadel05ricks·
@davidfrum If they were "seriously preparing to defend Greenland" they would've had a group in DC pleading for a deal. TDS.
English
0
0
0
19
thevyom
thevyom@thevyom·
@davidfrum That's fine. They should stop looking for oil and gas from that area also..
English
0
0
0
31
Sorin Iancu
Sorin Iancu@SorinIancu3·
@davidfrum Only David Frum doesn’t understand that this episode and the Iran war have sealed NATO’s demise. The U.S. has no longer common national security interests with the Islamized Europe. Only Eastern European countries will remain allies, together with Israel and many Asian countries.
English
0
1
0
65
Antony
Antony@Ant0nyB0y·
@davidfrum As much as it is painful for Europe to see how gas prices are increasing on a daily level, this could also be a blessing in disguise. Trump is blood thirsty, and it was just a question of who would be the next after Venezuela. Focus is now on Iran.
English
1
1
12
780
Garry Wentz
Garry Wentz@WentzGarry·
@davidfrum JFC David. Any country's military that has to book a flight on commercial airlines to get a platoon to Greenland can't be called a military.
English
0
0
0
16
Friendly Stranger
Friendly Stranger@FriendlySt79779·
@davidfrum the Europeans should not go to Hormuz "to help the Americans" - they should go to Hormuz to help themselves. it is America that's incidentally helping Europe by removing the Eyeranian menace from Hormuz and the entire energy exporting nations in the Persian Gulf
English
2
0
2
669
desertduck
desertduck@DesertDuck4Lyfe·
@davidfrum Why would the US need to sneak? We could announce our intent and give times and locations and they would still have zero chance.
English
0
0
0
63
BocaDuke
BocaDuke@BocaDuk3·
@davidfrum the memo really went out today for everyone to say Europe had to prepare to defend Greenland…. this is so inorganic and fake.
English
0
0
0
119
Поделиться