GunsOfLiberty

“An unconstitutional Act is not a law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; it affords no protection; it creates no office; it is, in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed.” Norton v. Shelby County, 118 U.S. 425, 442.

@BearingArmsCom Have you seen what happens on public transportation? I’d carry too 😆

Machine Gun Found on Bus Rider in Anti-Gun Washington State bearingarms.com/tomknighton/20…

The ATF has spent years trying to legislate from a desk. Alabama should answer with a Second Amendment Preservation Act -- with real teeth -- that tells state officials to stand down and NOT cooperate with federal agents on constitutional overreaches.

@beinlibertarian Not only that , but enforcement is a violation of their oath, and shall be treated as such

Any police, sheriff, or other law enforcement that enforces the new gun control laws in Virginia isn’t worth a pinch of puppy shit. Afroman needs to be hired to do mock these redcoats mercilessly.

@hcksqtjimduggan Nullify speed limits

Thanks to the boys in blue for keeping Nashville safe!

@TheBattlecock Beautiful

Look at these borders. Just look at em. It’s all freehand work, I don’t have a laser. 🤷‍♂️

@LPNational This judge should be impeached just for this:

We need to get this guy out of prison! DEXTER TAYLOR DID NOTHING WRONG

So about those kill switches government is demanding in cars…

@mattgaetz Buy more Ammo. If the Dems regain power, it’ll be time

This is not a drill

In case you missed it, with situations like our Post Office Carry injunction win, you are protected if you are a current Second Amendment Foundation member OR if you sign up now (head over to saf.org for a $25 annual membership, $100 for 5 years, or other options - remember that we are a 501(c)(3) as well!). If you are unsure where your membership stands, you can email info@saf.org. Please include your name, address, and contact information (email the account is under, phone number, etc.). We will confirm your membership or let you know how to get up to date.

Government permission not needed. youtube.com/watch?v=5AliJB… "Natural liberty is the right, which nature gives to all mankind, of disposing of their persons and property, after the manner they judge most convenient to their happiness" -Jean-Jacques Burlamaqui - Principles of Natural and Politic Law, Book 2, Part 1, Chap 3 (1748)

Re-read the Second Amendment a few minutes ago, still no mention of needing to pass a background check in order to acquire a firearm. (However, it does say, "Shall Not Be Infringed.")

@JensTwoCents_AZ Isn’t this a 4th Amendment violation?

🚨 EXCLUSIVE INVESTIGATION A single license plate search in Arizona can include 95,000+ cameras. Jen’s Two Cents obtained public records showing how license plate reader systems operate across the state. This is not about outcomes. It’s about scale. ➡️ More than 95,000 cameras can be included in a single search ➡️ A single query can extend across 6,000+ networks ➡️ Search reasons range from littering and traffic infractions to kidnapping and homicide ➡️ No single statewide framework governs how these systems are used or shared 33,000+ queries in one month of data. 👉 Read the report: jens2cents.com/p/scale-of-the… #SunshineWeek #FOIA #azleg @EFF @IRE_NICAR @JasonBassler1 @juliecbarrett @MerissaCaldwell

Analysis: People Transporting Guns Have Long Enjoyed Broad Protection Under the Law (By Alan Beck)

@Nate4Senate Amen

Do you want to know what a well regulated militia is? If the government tries to take away our firearms, they are going to find out. It is my inalienable right to protect myself from enemies, foreign and domestic. God Bless America 🇺🇸

HANDS OFF HOMEMADE FIREARMS. NRA’s landmark Supreme Court case, NYSRPA v Bruen, is clear: firearm laws must have historical support. Homemade firearms have long been part of America’s story, and we remain committed to protecting them. NRA’s @JustinDavis207 weighs in on the madness in Minnesota and dispels myths about Tim Walz's radical gun control agenda.

💯 OS age verification law: "You no longer own your computer". It violates the First, Fourth, and Fifth Amendments. No OS has to comply - "any law repugnant to the Constitution is null and void". Developers who do deserve class-action lawsuits.

PATENT BREAKDOWN: US 2,056,975. INVENTOR: Charles J. Michal Jr. WHEN: 1934. STATUS: Expired. Charles describes a repeat reset mechanism for the Browning 1911. The patent was filed before a machine gun was defined in the National Firearms Act, which is why he calls it a "machine gun and convertor therefor," as there was no legal definition for a machine gun at the time. The system is similar to the Super Safety, and about as simple: See Fig. 2. The cam (red) is contacted and rotated counterclockwise by the slide as it moves rearward, this moves the pin (green) forward against the trigger bar (blue, see Fig. 1) moving the trigger forward against the trigger finger. The pin continues to hold the trigger forward until the slide completes its cycle, at which point the cam is free to rotate back allowing the trigger to be pulled again. The patents own words are: "The trigger 23 fires the piece as before. But, the instant that recoil takes place, the lower edge of the slide 12 engages the cam 28 of the converter 27, thus rotating it counter-clockwise, and forcing the pin 29 forward. This motion of the pin forces the trigger forward against the pressure of the trigger-finger of the man..." And "The pin 29 holds the trigger inoperative against the pressure of the trigger-finger. But, the instant that counter-recoil is completed, the cam 28 is free to move upward again, and consequently the pressure of the trigger-finger immediately again discharges the piece."

What say you 3d2a at large... is it time we made a feature length documentary about our community that truly represents all corners of what it is we do and hold true? It may be high time to set the record straight. Comment below.

@mike_seigel @Magpul Basically, DOJ is trying to dismiss the case. Are they enforcing it? There’s been some buzz that they are. I’ve also seen a hat they are not. I need to dig into the weeds to see who, and what

@GunsofLiberty75 @Magpul Whats going on with braces- I’ve been on a trip. I thought it was settled and gtg?

Let’s hand out pistol braces like @Magpul handed out magazines

All right, it's time for a recap of this case's history, because this is NOT a good look for the ATF. This lawsuit challenges the ATF's "engaged in the business" rule. The district court granted a preliminary injunction blocking the rule for all the right reasons. Key word: PRELIMINARY. Not a permanent injunction. Not summary judgment. Just a stay of enforcement while the case proceeds on the merits. The ATF appealed that stay of enforcement to the 5th Circuit. Then they proceeded to ask for no less than six stays of the case, citing "administrative review of challenged rule": - 2/23/25: granted till 6/23/25 - 6/25: granted till 8/22 - 8/22: granted 10/21 (this time despite opposition) - 10/20: granted till 12/22 - 12/22: DENIED Then oral arguments were TENTATIVELY scheduled for the week of 3/20, then tentatively rescheduled for the week of 4/27. Finally, we have an official date for oral arguments, where the ATF will finally be expected to put its money where its mouth is and defend the unconstitutional rule it refuses to repeal.