GunsOfLiberty

@gunrights @AAGDhillon Thank you @AAGDhillon Word is Boulder County, CO is up to the same tricks banning America’s rifle

🚨 BREAKING NEWS! @AAGDhillon just dropped a cease-and-desist on the City of Denver. Ordering them to get rid of their AR-15 ban, or the DOJ WILL be suing to enforce the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding citizens. You love to see it!

@servantheart124 I’m saying it now

@GunsofLiberty75 Good luck with that in today's climate. That was spoken when we were a self sufficient people, before government interjected itself into every single area and portion of our lives. If he said that today he'd be locked away for being crazy, but I agree with him. And you.

“A man may repel force by force in defense of his person, against any one who manifestly intends or endeavors by violence or surprise, feloniously to kill him. And he is not obliged to retreat, but he may pursue his adversary until he has secured himself from all danger; and if he kill him in so doing, it is justifiable homicide.”—Theophilus Parsons

❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️

"SAF and its partners have filed an amicus brief with the U.S. Supreme Court urging review in Patrick Tate Adamiak v. United States, a case involving a decorated Navy veteran sentenced to 20 years in prison for possessing cut-up gun parts and two inert RPG-7 training dummies. Adamiak enlisted in the United States Navy at 17 years old, serving in the Middle East, Africa, Europe and the Panama Canal. At the time of his arrest, he had orders to report to BUD/S and had completed the first phase of training on his way to becoming a Navy SEAL. He was also a gun collector who sold legal gun parts until a paid ATF informant falsely reported that he had a Mk-19 grenade launcher. After a search of his home and subsequent trial, Adamiak was sentenced to more than 20 years in prison..." "... “This case highlights the human cost of lower courts’ refusal to faithfully apply Bruen,” said SAF founder and Executive Vice President Alan M. Gottlieb. “A Navy veteran is behind bars over inert gun parts, yet his Second Amendment claim was never even heard on the merits. SAF and its partners are committed to defending the right to keep and bear arms against this kind of judicial abuse, and we believe the Supreme Court must intervene.”..." Full Article Here: saf.org/saf-files-amic…

@21stCentury2nd 58 innocent people that couldn’t defend themselves. End gun free zones

@GunsofLiberty75 58 innocent people in las vegas didn't get the chance info.publicintelligence.net/LVMPD-Route91S…

The self defense of liberty is always justified. Stand your ground

@fourboxesdiner Mark, dropped the full 300-year chain behind the Cartridge Box you teach every day on Four Boxes Diner. From Montesquieu’s separation of powers through Sidney, Locke, Cato, Beccaria, Blackstone, Otis, Parsons, Madison, Hamilton & Jefferson straight to the Second Amendment. This is why tyrants still tremble and why an armed people is the final insurance policy on liberty. Would love your take, brother. 🔥

@MorosKostas Thank you for filling the brief. His case has been a miscarriage of justice. I still can’t get over the ATF actually manufacturing evidence.

Adamiak is set for conference before the amicus brief deadline? That's odd. (Deadline is 30 days from when it was docketed, which is May 16). Not really inspiring confidence they will read any briefs. Well, ignored or not, ours is being filed tomorrow. It's done early.

“The Second Amendment didn’t come from nowhere. It’s the final link in a 300-year chain of free men refusing to be disarmed or dominated. Read it. Share it. Live it. Tyrants tremble for a reason. 🔥 #2A #ShallNotBeInfringed”

@z3r0_burn @LPaulson7 @MonotoneArms @USCons_Amend_II “A departure from principle in one instance becomes a precedent for a second; that second for a third; and so on, till the bulk of the society is reduced to be mere automatons of misery, to have no sensibilities left but for sin and suffering.” — Thomas Jefferson

@LPaulson7 @MonotoneArms @USCons_Amend_II @GunsofLiberty75 It's literally the point! You can't use unconstitutional laws to uphold other unconstitutional laws. You haven't had SCOTUS rule on full autos, just reference other ideas around them. That's the literal core of this entire discussion!

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

I keep telling y’all this

“Swords were given to men, that none might be Slaves, but such as know not how to use them.” —Algernon Sidney

@LPaulson7 @MonotoneArms @z3r0_burn @USCons_Amend_II I will defend my liberty by any means necessary

@MonotoneArms @z3r0_burn @USCons_Amend_II @GunsofLiberty75 And they get charged with it. Go do it, you’ll catch a felony too

Absolute truth

@LPaulson7 @z3r0_burn @MonotoneArms @USCons_Amend_II

@z3r0_burn @MonotoneArms @USCons_Amend_II @GunsofLiberty75 Banning certain guns does not deprive you from the right of self defense bud…

@MonotoneArms @LPaulson7 @z3r0_burn @USCons_Amend_II “To consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions [is] a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy.” — Thomas Jefferson

@LPaulson7 @z3r0_burn @USCons_Amend_II @GunsofLiberty75 SCOTUS has already ruled that interest balancing is unconstitutional in regards to the 2A, so no... your lies about public safety will not win out.

St. George Tucker wrote of this very issue, when speaking about the oath of office and a DUTY to not just oppose usurpations of power in words, but to actively defy and disobey them. Tucker’s exact quote. "The people are not only not bound by them [usurpations], but the several departments and officers of the governments, both federal, and state, are bound by oath to oppose them; for, being bound by oath to support the constitution, they must violate that oath, whenever they give their sanction, by obedience, or otherwise, to any unconstitutional act of any department of the government."

You're in direct violation of your oath the moment you advocate restricting arms in contravention of the second amendment. Rights do not now, never have, and never can come from a human document. Read the second amendment carefully, Mr Helmer. It assumes the existence of a natural right to self defense, and is an INSTRUCTION from We the People to government - telling it in no uncertain terms to keep its grubby hands off our right to self defense. Common sense means not empowering the government to violate rights - especially when governments are going fascist at accelerating rates.